Editorial Comment: 6th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries

scientific article published on 01 June 2018

Editorial Comment: 6th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries is …
instance of (P31):
editorialQ871232
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1097/01.BLO.0000534688.76623.00
P932PMC publication ID6263569
P698PubMed publication ID29771852

P50authorOla RolfsonQ42849306
P2860cites workJoint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses.Q37158373
Early mortality and morbidity after total hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractureQ37428888
Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?Q37483338
The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacementsQ42690594
The value of arthroplasty registry dataQ42836484
Patient-reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative CohortQ57417091
Joint registries: what can we learn in 2016?Q30239878
Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk dataQ33700250
Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplastyQ34164613
Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplastyQ34235149
Improved results of primary total hip replacementQ35550040
NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003.Q35789963
The operation of the century: total hip replacementQ36983030
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries.Q37077517
P433issue6
P304page(s)1164-1165
P577publication date2018-06-01
P1433published inClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchQ5133783
P1476titleEditorial Comment: 6th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries
P478volume476

Search more.