| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | S A Roberts | |
| P Fielding | |||
| K G Foley | |||
| W G Lewis | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Update on time-of-flight PET imaging | Q26992166 |
| Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement | Q28082297 | ||
| Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research | Q28709212 | ||
| Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review | Q33547696 | ||
| What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? | Q33849998 | ||
| A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis | Q34411363 | ||
| Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status | Q34462598 | ||
| NEOSCOPE: a randomised Phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by either oxaliplatin/capecitabine or paclitaxel/carboplatin based chemoradiation as pre-operative regimen for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma | Q35085650 | ||
| An introduction to PET-CT imaging | Q35693828 | ||
| Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography | Q36451769 | ||
| Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results | Q36991618 | ||
| FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. | Q37469186 | ||
| Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects | Q37671448 | ||
| Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophageal carcinoma--a systematic review | Q37916855 | ||
| Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation. | Q38736992 | ||
| Context bias. A problem in diagnostic radiology | Q41239725 | ||
| Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis | Q41972285 | ||
| N-staging of oesophageal and junctional carcinoma: is there still a role for EUS in patients staged N0 at PET/CT? | Q53063333 | ||
| A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. | Q53524538 | ||
| A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models | Q57393274 | ||
| Histologic Tumor Type Is an Independent Prognostic Parameter in Esophageal Cancer: Lessons From More Than 1,000 Consecutive Resections at a Single Center in the Western World | Q58484706 | ||
| Surgical pathology of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus. Analysis of 67 cases | Q72437894 | ||
| Relation between endoscopic ultrasound findings and outcome of patients with tumors of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction | Q73370784 | ||
| Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? | Q83391342 | ||
| P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
| P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
| P433 | issue | 12 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 4973-4979 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2018-06-04 | |
| P1433 | published in | Surgical Endoscopy | Q7646203 |
| P1476 | title | Additional value of EUS in oesophageal cancer patients staged N0 on PET/CT: validation of a prognostic model | |
| P478 | volume | 32 |
Search more.