scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Daeria Lawson | Q59099740 |
Russell de Souza | Q47811825 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Kevin Cheung | |
Bradley C Johnston | |||
Shrikant I Bangdiwala | |||
Dena Zeraatkar | |||
Arnav Gupta | |||
Jessica J Bartoszko | |||
Kirolos Milio | |||
Max Zworth | |||
Arrti Bhasin | |||
Michel Kiflen | |||
Rita E Morassut | |||
Salmi T Noor | |||
P2860 | cites work | Confounding in publications of observational intervention studies. | Q53022037 |
Priority issues, study designs and geographical distribution in nutrition journals. | Q53097912 | ||
Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies: Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals | Q57091403 | ||
Ramadan fasting alters food patterns, dietary diversity and body weight among Ghanaian adolescents | Q58788556 | ||
Predictors of drop-out in overweight and obese outpatients | Q60441354 | ||
Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies | Q77338498 | ||
Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research | Q77794178 | ||
The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start | Q84840329 | ||
The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data | Q88131249 | ||
Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational Studies | Q90827000 | ||
Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions. | Q40901253 | ||
The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation | Q43670469 | ||
Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders | Q46164613 | ||
Adherence to a dietary fat intake reduction program in postmenopausal women receiving therapy for early breast cancer. The Women's Intervention Nutrition Study | Q46191112 | ||
A large randomized individual and group intervention conducted by registered dietitians increased adherence to Mediterranean-type diets: the PREDIMED study. | Q46511623 | ||
Quality assessment of nutrition coverage in the media: a 6-week survey of five popular UK newspapers | Q47183861 | ||
Interpretation of epidemiologic studies very often lacked adequate consideration of confounding | Q47550752 | ||
On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference | Q49083477 | ||
Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey. | Q52048595 | ||
An improper use of statistical significance testing in studying covariables. | Q52783125 | ||
Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. | Q52884423 | ||
Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias. | Q52953016 | ||
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies | Q21092368 | ||
Media coverage of medical journals: do the best articles make the news? | Q24288686 | ||
Placing epidemiological results in the context of multiplicity and typical correlations of exposures | Q24289033 | ||
Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations | Q24289437 | ||
Problems due to small samples and sparse data in conditional logistic regression analysis | Q30586978 | ||
The development and validation of an instrument to measure the quality of health research reports in the lay media | Q33582251 | ||
Variable selection for propensity score models | Q34803815 | ||
Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates | Q35661934 | ||
Confounding: what is it and how do we deal with it? | Q35847892 | ||
Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice | Q35911307 | ||
Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives | Q35995075 | ||
Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight | Q36001227 | ||
Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice | Q36183802 | ||
Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions | Q36764748 | ||
Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research | Q36890336 | ||
Quality Reporting of Multivariable Regression Models in Observational Studies: Review of a Representative Sample of Articles Published in Biomedical Journals | Q36993092 | ||
Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review | Q37240672 | ||
Variable selection: current practice in epidemiological studies | Q37469151 | ||
A review of covariate selection for non-experimental comparative effectiveness research. | Q38134365 | ||
Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection | Q38180514 | ||
A new criterion for confounder selection | Q38295854 | ||
Statistical foundations for model-based adjustments | Q38382772 | ||
Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline | Q38578040 | ||
Use of Causal Diagrams to Inform the Design and Interpretation of Observational Studies: An Example from the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). | Q38935256 | ||
P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | Q34179348 |
P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
P433 | issue | 10 | |
P921 | main subject | nutritional epidemiology | Q7070522 |
P304 | page(s) | nzz104 | |
P577 | publication date | 2019-09-17 | |
P1433 | published in | Current Developments in Nutrition | Q68836060 |
P1476 | title | Methods for the Selection of Covariates in Nutritional Epidemiology Studies: A Meta-Epidemiological Review | |
P478 | volume | 3 |