Methods for the Selection of Covariates in Nutritional Epidemiology Studies: A Meta-Epidemiological Review

scientific article published on 17 September 2019

Methods for the Selection of Covariates in Nutritional Epidemiology Studies: A Meta-Epidemiological Review is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1093/CDN/NZZ104
P932PMC publication ID6778415
P698PubMed publication ID31598577

P50authorDaeria LawsonQ59099740
Russell de SouzaQ47811825
P2093author name stringKevin Cheung
Bradley C Johnston
Shrikant I Bangdiwala
Dena Zeraatkar
Arnav Gupta
Jessica J Bartoszko
Kirolos Milio
Max Zworth
Arrti Bhasin
Michel Kiflen
Rita E Morassut
Salmi T Noor
P2860cites workConfounding in publications of observational intervention studies.Q53022037
Priority issues, study designs and geographical distribution in nutrition journals.Q53097912
Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies: Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care JournalsQ57091403
Ramadan fasting alters food patterns, dietary diversity and body weight among Ghanaian adolescentsQ58788556
Predictors of drop-out in overweight and obese outpatientsQ60441354
Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studiesQ77338498
Causal diagrams for epidemiologic researchQ77794178
The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the startQ84840329
The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational DataQ88131249
Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational StudiesQ90827000
Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.Q40901253
The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimationQ43670469
Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confoundersQ46164613
Adherence to a dietary fat intake reduction program in postmenopausal women receiving therapy for early breast cancer. The Women's Intervention Nutrition StudyQ46191112
A large randomized individual and group intervention conducted by registered dietitians increased adherence to Mediterranean-type diets: the PREDIMED study.Q46511623
Quality assessment of nutrition coverage in the media: a 6-week survey of five popular UK newspapersQ47183861
Interpretation of epidemiologic studies very often lacked adequate consideration of confoundingQ47550752
On model selection and model misspecification in causal inferenceQ49083477
Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey.Q52048595
An improper use of statistical significance testing in studying covariables.Q52783125
Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies.Q52884423
Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.Q52953016
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesQ21092368
Media coverage of medical journals: do the best articles make the news?Q24288686
Placing epidemiological results in the context of multiplicity and typical correlations of exposuresQ24289033
Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associationsQ24289437
Problems due to small samples and sparse data in conditional logistic regression analysisQ30586978
The development and validation of an instrument to measure the quality of health research reports in the lay mediaQ33582251
Variable selection for propensity score modelsQ34803815
Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimatesQ35661934
Confounding: what is it and how do we deal with it?Q35847892
Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practiceQ35911307
Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternativesQ35995075
Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sightQ36001227
Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practiceQ36183802
Sensitivity Analysis Without AssumptionsQ36764748
Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related ResearchQ36890336
Quality Reporting of Multivariable Regression Models in Observational Studies: Review of a Representative Sample of Articles Published in Biomedical JournalsQ36993092
Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic reviewQ37240672
Variable selection: current practice in epidemiological studiesQ37469151
A review of covariate selection for non-experimental comparative effectiveness research.Q38134365
Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selectionQ38180514
A new criterion for confounder selectionQ38295854
Statistical foundations for model-based adjustmentsQ38382772
Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guidelineQ38578040
Use of Causal Diagrams to Inform the Design and Interpretation of Observational Studies: An Example from the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP).Q38935256
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 InternationalQ34179348
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue10
P921main subjectnutritional epidemiologyQ7070522
P304page(s)nzz104
P577publication date2019-09-17
P1433published inCurrent Developments in NutritionQ68836060
P1476titleMethods for the Selection of Covariates in Nutritional Epidemiology Studies: A Meta-Epidemiological Review
P478volume3