| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Ling Chen | |
| Jiao Yang | |||
| Ke Ge | |||
| Jian-Le Yang | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomies | Q57479508 |
| Surgical complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in a nationwide Swedish cohort study | Q58204523 | ||
| Optimum Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer | Q63546499 | ||
| Morbidity in open versus minimally invasive hybrid esophagectomy (MIOMIE): Long-term results of a randomized controlled clinical study. | Q64911460 | ||
| Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach | Q68107458 | ||
| Lymphadenectomy extent is closely related to long-term survival in esophageal cancer | Q79404117 | ||
| Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy | Q79633215 | ||
| Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy | Q89022909 | ||
| Long-term outcome of open versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a propensity score matched study† | Q89249567 | ||
| Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer | Q90962674 | ||
| Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of NSQIP Database | Q92710486 | ||
| Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications | Q95424742 | ||
| Morbidity analysis in minimally invasive esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer versus conventional over the last 10 years, a single institution experience | Q33837985 | ||
| Oesophageal carcinoma | Q34325751 | ||
| Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. | Q34525049 | ||
| Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial | Q35833494 | ||
| Major postoperative complications are associated with impaired long-term survival after gastro-esophageal and pancreatic cancer surgery: a complete national cohort study | Q36021716 | ||
| Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma | Q36183129 | ||
| Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery | Q36401204 | ||
| Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities | Q36836275 | ||
| Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer | Q37797980 | ||
| Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer | Q38610362 | ||
| The Impact of Severe Anastomotic Leak on Long-term Survival and Cancer Recurrence After Surgical Resection for Esophageal Malignancy | Q38953204 | ||
| Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients. | Q39023031 | ||
| Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series | Q39025743 | ||
| Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers | Q39201867 | ||
| Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: impact on postoperative inflammatory and nutritional status | Q40507352 | ||
| Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). | Q41384836 | ||
| Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial | Q42646554 | ||
| Does systematic 2-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal malignancy offer a survival advantage? Results from 178 consecutive patients | Q42654380 | ||
| Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial | Q42686705 | ||
| Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer | Q42687861 | ||
| Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer | Q43703471 | ||
| The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer | Q45189942 | ||
| The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. | Q46079948 | ||
| Comparison of perioperative outcomes following hybrid minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer | Q47109626 | ||
| Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches | Q48046635 | ||
| Robot-Assisted Hybrid Esophagectomy Is Associated with a Shorter Length of Stay Compared to Conventional Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study | Q48180446 | ||
| Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center. | Q50721126 | ||
| Prediction of major postoperative complications and survival for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients. | Q50920437 | ||
| P433 | issue | 11 | |
| P921 | main subject | esophageal cancer | Q372701 |
| meta-analysis | Q815382 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 1081-1091 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2019-11-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | World journal of gastrointestinal oncology | Q27723329 |
| P1476 | title | Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis | |
| P478 | volume | 11 |
| Q97643977 | Current status of esophageal cancer treatment | cites work | P2860 |
Search more.