Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

scientific article published on 08 July 2019

Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1186/S12903-019-0831-4
P932PMC publication ID6615229
P698PubMed publication ID31286897

P2093author name stringWei Zheng
Yu Li
Xu Zhang
Li Mei
Xinyu Yan
Jieya Wei
Yanxi Li
P2860cites workEfficacy of professional hygiene and prophylaxis on preventing plaque increase in orthodontic patients with multibracket appliances: a systematic reviewQ26996077
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literatureQ29614233
Bracket placement in lingual vs labial systems and direct vs indirect bondingQ33283052
Indirect bonding--a new transfer methodQ33319950
Publication and related biasesQ33994869
How and why of orthodontic bond failures: An in vivo studyQ34147402
Are self-ligating brackets related to less formation of Streptococcus mutans colonies? A systematic reviewQ34414272
Effects of self-ligating brackets on oral hygiene and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trialsQ34522786
The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysisQ34538003
A Unique Bonding Technique for Immediate Orthognathic SurgeryQ35918302
Comparison of multiple rebond shear strengths of debonded brackets after preparation with sandblasting and CO2 laserQ36139176
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication biasQ37818958
Practice-based comparison of direct and indirect bondingQ38439317
Interventions for orthodontically induced white spot lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Q39026014
Transfer accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane trays for indirect bondingQ40555241
A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodonticsQ40748455
Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesivesQ40929639
Indirect orthodontic bonding--a modified technique for improved efficiency and precisionQ42048927
Micro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesivesQ42590455
Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.Q43276909
Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachmentQ43509657
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping reviewQ47159405
A clinical comparison of bracket bond failures in association with direct and indirect bondingQ47591093
Effectiveness of an indirect bonding technique in reducing plaque accumulation around bracesQ48117405
Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? A randomized clinical trialQ50059312
Orthodontics with Customized versus Noncustomized Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Q50520329
Effects of double transparent pressure diaphragm transfer tray on indirect bondingQ50854123
The role of the funnel plot in detecting publication and related biases in meta-analysisQ51465921
A retrospective survey of the causes of bracket- and tube-bonding failuresQ53558094
Effect of the bracket types on microbial colonization and periodontal statusQ53574695
A randomized clinical trial comparing the accuracy of direct versus indirect bracket placementQ53620091
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Direct and Indirect Bonding Methods andQ64328377
Effects of motivational methods on oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Q64884018
A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesiveQ68542479
A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic bracketsQ69193554
Clinical studies of glass ionomer cements. Part I--A twelve month clinical study comparing zinc phosphate cement to glass ionomerQ69928047
Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: Progress reportQ70868236
Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniquesQ71475458
Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniquesQ73340704
Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniquesQ78209580
Comparison of oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliancesQ84273434
A problem with the modified and standardized indirect bonding techniqueQ84502447
Comparison of enamel-bracket bond strength using direct- and indirect-bonding techniques with a self-etching ion releasing S-PRG fillerQ86883349
Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditionsQ87519071
Comparative assessment of treatment efficacy and adverse effects during nonextraction orthodontic treatment of Class I malocclusion patients with direct and indirect bonding: A parallel randomized clinical trialQ89344604
P433issue1
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
P304page(s)137
P577publication date2019-07-08
P1433published inBMC Oral HealthQ15751036
P1476titleEffectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
P478volume19

Reverse relations

Q94450894Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placementcites workP2860

Search more.