scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Christian Puta | Q50954082 |
Thomas Weiss | Q86631637 | ||
Frauke Musial | Q88041441 | ||
P2093 | author name string | G Kvarstein | |
A J Norheim | |||
H Nothnagel | |||
M Brown Menard | |||
S D Mist | |||
P2860 | cites work | The sensitivity of estimates of regression to the mean. | Q51818930 |
Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. | Q51832048 | ||
The effect of regression to the mean in epidemiologic and clinical studies. | Q52839879 | ||
Regression to the mean. A threat to exercise science? | Q52952006 | ||
The "Hawthorne effect"--what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? | Q54189250 | ||
How to deal with regression to the mean in intervention studies | Q58679030 | ||
The significance of clinical significance | Q81211182 | ||
The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial | Q21261930 | ||
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy | Q24288966 | ||
The clinical importance of changes in the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for worst, least, and average pain intensity: analyses of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders | Q33492016 | ||
A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. | Q33522303 | ||
Effect of regression to the mean on decision making in health care | Q33815060 | ||
Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a "trial effect". | Q33935724 | ||
Placebo responses in patients with gastrointestinal disorders | Q34098616 | ||
Prediction of placebo responses: a systematic review of the literature | Q34272476 | ||
Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. | Q34343839 | ||
What Happened at Hawthorne?: New evidence suggests the Hawthorne effect resulted from operant reinforcement contingencies | Q34672356 | ||
Is patient satisfaction sensitive to changes in the quality of care? An exploitation of the Hawthorne effect | Q34735347 | ||
Some examples of regression towards the mean | Q36887106 | ||
Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. | Q36984861 | ||
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations | Q37022616 | ||
New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses | Q37230629 | ||
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects | Q37671448 | ||
Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain | Q39387894 | ||
Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain | Q39677408 | ||
Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale | Q40678235 | ||
How to handle worsening of condition during treatment - risk assessment in homeopathic practice | Q41138657 | ||
A Comparison of Pain Assessment Measures in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Rating Scale | Q41600058 | ||
Estimating the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in the clinic: evaluation of a CBT informed pain management programme | Q43416456 | ||
Impact of the Hawthorne effect in a longitudinal clinical study: the case of anesthesia | Q44995811 | ||
P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported | Q18810331 |
P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
P304 | page(s) | 2027-2037 | |
P577 | publication date | 2019-07-03 | |
P1433 | published in | Journal of Pain Research | Q6295704 |
P1476 | title | Recruitment and inclusion procedures as "pain killers" in clinical trials? | |
P478 | volume | 12 |
Search more.