Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback

scientific article published on 09 March 2019

Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJQS-2018-008355
P932PMC publication ID6559780
P698PubMed publication ID30852557

P50authorJeremy GrimshawQ28359691
Sylvia J HysongQ56949534
Wouter T GudeQ58371830
P2093author name stringNoah Ivers
Robbie Foy
Jill J Francis
Stefanie Linklater
Audit and Feedback MetaLab
P2860cites workAudit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomesQ24202862
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation scienceQ29620036
The translation research in a dental setting (TRiaDS) programme protocolQ30496023
Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice: an intervention development protocolQ30601890
Data feedback and behavioural change intervention to improve primary care prescribing safety (EFIPPS): multicentre, three arm, cluster randomised controlled trialQ31122448
Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trialQ33730359
The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trialsQ33868298
The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized TrialsQ34489528
An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Q36116921
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical frameworkQ36261791
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysisQ36420861
A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal-newborn dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocolQ36865351
No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated interventionQ37497408
A multidimensional approach to assessing intervention fidelity in a process evaluation of audit and feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions: a study protocolQ37498017
Negotiating Tensions Between Theory and Design in the Development of Mailings for People Recovering From Acute Coronary SyndromeQ37703391
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical researchQ38177450
Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health careQ38223253
Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trialQ38680494
Reporting and design elements of audit and feedback interventions: a secondary reviewQ38711967
Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies: A case study from UK primary careQ39830928
Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing EffectivenessQ39977953
Reducing research waste with implementation laboratoriesQ40627059
Assessing the long-term effect of educational reminder messages on primary care radiology referralsQ48007864
Inside the Black Box of Audit and Feedback: a Laboratory Study to Explore Determinants of Improvement Target Selection by Healthcare Professionals in Cardiac Rehabilitation.Q50249495
How does audit and feedback influence intentions of health professionals to improve practice? A laboratory experiment and field study in cardiac rehabilitation.Q50521092
Embedding researchers in health service organizations improves research translation and health service performance: the Australian Hunter New England Population Health example.Q53401758
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelinesQ73588535
P433issue5
P304page(s)416-423
P577publication date2019-03-09
P1433published inBMJ Quality & SafetyQ4835970
P1476titleReinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback
P478volume28

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q98163406A stepped-wedge randomised-controlled trial assessing the implementation, impact and costs of a prospective feedback loop to promote appropriate care and treatment for older patients in acute hospitals at the end of life: study protocol
Q97645435Advancing health equity through CTSA programs: Opportunities for interaction between health equity, dissemination and implementation, and translational science
Q92772432Compliance with legal requirement to report clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cohort study
Q92819840Designing clinical practice feedback reports: three steps illustrated in Veterans Health Affairs long-term care facilities and programs
Q89925800Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care
Q91724576Testing e-mail content to encourage physicians to access an audit and feedback tool: a factorial randomized experiment

Search more.