Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook

scientific article published on 05 August 2019

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1186/S12874-019-0804-Y
P932PMC publication ID6683577
P698PubMed publication ID31382898

P50authorLivia PuljakQ56958166
Tina Poklepović PeričićQ88451754
P2093author name stringMatija Boric
Ivana Vuka
Marija Cavar
Ognjen Barcot
Svjetlana Dosenovic
P2860cites workRisk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviewsQ90154063
Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequateQ92317245
Risk of selection bias in randomised trialsQ26781706
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsQ27860509
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional StudyQ36027782
Bias in clinical intervention research.Q36380552
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research studyQ36396374
Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs.Q38043704
Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studiesQ38044510
Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective studyQ38932863
Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials for Autism Spectrum DisorderQ47141355
Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Q48128309
PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysisQ53109929
In Cochrane reviews risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidanceQ57480304
The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic surveyQ64053550
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparabilityQ64070597
P433issue1
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
P304page(s)170
P577publication date2019-08-05
P1433published inBMC Medical Research MethodologyQ15752152
P1476titleRisk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
P478volume19

Search more.