Comparative Analysis of Early Follow-up of Biologic Fixation and Cemented Stem Fixation for Femoral Tumor Prosthesis

scientific article published on 01 June 2019

Comparative Analysis of Early Follow-up of Biologic Fixation and Cemented Stem Fixation for Femoral Tumor Prosthesis is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1111/OS.12483
P932PMC publication ID6595119
P698PubMed publication ID31243921

P2093author name stringYuan Li
Xiao-Hui Niu
Yang Sun
Hua-Chao Shan
P2860cites workCemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseasesQ24198038
From amputation to limb salvage reconstruction: evolution and role of the endoprosthesis in musculoskeletal oncologyQ26824206
Correlation of radiographic and telemetric data from massive implant fixations.Q30991039
Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implantsQ33956306
What are the 5-year survivorship outcomes of compressive endoprosthetic osseointegration fixation of the femur?Q35050310
Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncologyQ35146153
Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress implantQ35212197
Aseptic failure: how does the Compress(®) implant compare to cemented stems?Q35722902
Aseptic loosening rates in distal femoral endoprostheses: does stem size matter?Q35722935
Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur for bone tumours: long-term resultsQ36803278
Is cement still a fixation option for total hip arthroplasty?Q37238102
Long-term results for limb salvage with osteoarticular allograft reconstructionQ37350202
Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixationQ37380214
Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstructionQ37380254
A dual-center review of compressive osseointegration for fixation of massive endoprosthetics: 2- to 9-year followupQ37563694
Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplastyQ37750492
Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature reviewQ37849054
Uncemented tumor endoprostheses at the knee: root causes of failureQ40392929
Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvisQ47667534
Prosthetic knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur. Medium to long-term results.Q50884677
Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma.Q51203951
A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system.Q52228023
Revision of the Kotz type of tumour endoprosthesis for the lower limb.Q53315056
Long-term followup of uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lower extremity.Q53323819
Segmental total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral resection for tumorQ70781175
Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limbQ71738627
A modular endoprosthetic system for tumor and non-tumor reconstruction: preliminary experienceQ73275735
[Comparison of medium-term clinical and radiological outcome between cemented and cementless medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty]Q83630703
Large tumor endoprostheses and extracortical bone-bridging: 28 patients followed 10-20 yearsQ93937213
P433issue3
P304page(s)451-459
P577publication date2019-06-01
P1433published inOrthopaedic surgeryQ27723743
P1476titleComparative Analysis of Early Follow-up of Biologic Fixation and Cemented Stem Fixation for Femoral Tumor Prosthesis
P478volume11