| human | Q5 |
| P1153 | Scopus author ID | 55559031600 |
| P734 | family name | Clarke | Q1095787 |
| Clarke | Q1095787 | ||
| Clarke | Q1095787 | ||
| P735 | given name | Mike | Q361309 |
| Mike | Q361309 |
| Q48148510 | 'Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment' - the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials |
| Q92128773 | A 2 × 2 factorial, randomised, open-label trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hypertonic saline (HTS 6%) and carbocisteine for airway clearance versus usual care over 52 weeks in adults with bronchiectasis: a protocol for the C |
| Q46428530 | A research methodology study to map the process of initiating and operating a randomised controlled trial of podoconiosis treatment in Northern Ethiopia |
| Q45978571 | A review of the description of patient withdrawal in trial protocols and patient information sheets (PIS). |
| Q30486677 | A smartphone intervention for adolescent obesity: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial |
| Q35495943 | A study protocol for a pilot randomised trial of a structured education programme for the self-management of type 2 diabetes for adults with intellectual disabilities |
| Q59409943 | Abstracts of the 4th Meeting of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative |
| Q24240814 | Admission avoidance hospital at home |
| Q89662397 | Anticipatory care planning intervention for older adults at risk of functional decline: study protocol for a primary care cluster feasibility randomised trial |
| Q45983950 | Assessing the effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ on recruitment rates in a multicentre randomised trial: SWAT-1. |
| Q35987103 | COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol). |
| Q38075920 | Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups |
| Q37552987 | Can you believe what you read in the papers? |
| Q45984028 | Citation analysis: a new approach to assess the uptake of core outcome sets. |
| Q46743917 | Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials |
| Q45979880 | Collecting sensitive information for a sexual health trial with young people: experiences of using electronic data collection and traditional paper methods. |
| Q24244745 | Comparison of clinical efficacy of serotonin receptor antagonists in highly emetogenic chemotherapy |
| Q24246157 | Compression stockings for preventing deep vein thrombosis in airline passengers |
| Q30489087 | Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
| Q64236947 | Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement |
| Q38569742 | Core Outcomes in Ventilation Trials (COVenT): protocol for a core outcome set using a Delphi survey with a nested randomised trial and observational cohort study |
| Q35658444 | Core outcome sets and trial registries |
| Q36320178 | Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider |
| Q57460578 | Development of a standardised set of metrics for monitoring site performance in multicentre randomised trials: a Delphi study |
| Q45994029 | Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials (ORRCA). |
| Q45984257 | Development of guidance for statistical analysis plans (SAPs) for clinical trials. |
| Q64239313 | Diabetic macular oedema and diode subthreshold micropulse laser (DIAMONDS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| Q58755396 | Doing trials within trials: a qualitative study of stakeholder views on barriers and facilitators to the routine adoption of methodology research in clinical trials |
| Q95928345 | Early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy in patients with cancer who have low-risk neutropenic sepsis (the EASI-SWITCH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| Q34564423 | Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review |
| Q24198255 | Electric fans for reducing adverse health impacts in heatwaves |
| Q24202183 | Electric fans for reducing adverse health impacts in heatwaves |
| Q24245594 | Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage |
| Q24194997 | Entecavir for chronic hepatitis B |
| Q58609025 | Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
| Q46744053 | Feasibility of establishing a central repository for the individual participant data from research studies |
| Q48109910 | Global health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. |
| Q45978492 | Good practice principles for sharing individual participant data from publicly funded clinical trials. |
| Q24245582 | Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions |
| Q46418619 | Guidance to detect, evaluate and prevent the problem of selective reporting in trial publications |
| Q24245562 | Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials |
| Q46419732 | Has the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core outcome set influenced the selection of study outcome measures? |
| Q24235003 | Helping people make well-informed decisions before, during and after disasters: The Evidence Aid initiative |
| Q46415300 | How systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data can inform trial design and conduct |
| Q37251460 | How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline |
| Q38599438 | Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials |
| Q52803254 | Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study |
| Q36337125 | Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISR |
| Q45992341 | Incentives and rewards: what do adult populations truly want? Insights from the physical activity loyalty (PAL) scheme. |
| Q30000075 | Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use |
| Q59268294 | Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data |
| Q24246156 | Individual patient data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data |
| Q24235244 | International clinical trials day & the cochrane library |
| Q24236689 | Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews for clinical and commissioning decision-making |
| Q24200884 | Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians |
| Q46408207 | Introducing 'global health methodology research' a knowledge sharing platform open to all. |
| Q24194950 | Life-style modification, non-pharmacological and pharmacological strategies for obese subfertile women |
| Q24240517 | Life-style modification, non-pharmacological and pharmacological strategies for obese subfertile women |
| Q35653223 | Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform |
| Q24246167 | Masking reviewers at the study inclusion stage in a systematic review of health care interventions |
| Q24200789 | Medical treatment for small abdominal aortic aneurysms |
| Q24203949 | Medical treatment for small abdominal aortic aneurysms |
| Q31016826 | Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice. |
| Q24245566 | Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires |
| Q24240221 | Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires |
| Q24241534 | Multi-agent chemotherapy for early breast cancer |
| Q24193350 | Non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment |
| Q35011229 | Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years |
| Q24241508 | Ovarian ablation for early breast cancer |
| Q40047151 | Perceived barriers and facilitators to Risk Based Monitoring in academic-led clinical trials: a mixed methods study. |
| Q24194825 | Pharmacological treatment for antipsychotic-related constipation |
| Q45994059 | Pragmatic approaches to mitigating missing data and research priorities to assess the effectiveness of interventions. |
| Q30940208 | Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement |
| Q57473410 | Prevention of striae gravidarum: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
| Q24188247 | Primary immunosuppression following heart transplantation |
| Q24241215 | Primary immunosuppression following heart transplantation |
| Q59410783 | Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative |
| Q47204373 | Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section |
| Q24246177 | Publication bias in clinical trials |
| Q24241884 | Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results |
| Q24241493 | Radiotherapy for early breast cancer |
| Q45984353 | Reading or listening to review summaries - which method will produce greater understanding of the key outcomes in a cochrane review? |
| Q37138700 | Recruiting faith- and non-faith-based schools, adolescents and parents to a cluster randomised sexual-health trial: experiences, challenges and lessons from the mixed-methods Jack Feasibility Trial |
| Q45994302 | Recruiting schools, adolescents and parents to a sexual-health trial: experiences, challenges and lessons learned from the Jack Trial (NCT02092480). |
| Q96128873 | Repair of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Stromal Cell Administration in COVID-19 (REALIST-COVID-19): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial |
| Q45991761 | Reported reasons for missing data and the interplay with trial setting. |
| Q35600007 | SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a 'site visit' intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial |
| Q45984223 | Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ. |
| Q24202033 | Serotonin receptor antagonists for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in adults |
| Q24240511 | Serotonin receptor antagonists for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in adults |
| Q28659066 | Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository |
| Q45991714 | Smiley faces and the need for careful planning in trials. |
| Q42910882 | Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews |
| Q46409215 | Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland. |
| Q24241483 | Tamoxifen for early breast cancer |
| Q46744330 | The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative |
| Q24199056 | The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews |
| Q33877196 | The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. |
| Q33938597 | The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013. |
| Q38943784 | The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014). |
| Q46173074 | The COVenT study: developing a core outcome set for mechanical ventilation trials |
| Q45994176 | The NICOLA questionnaire trial (NICOLA-QT): a randomised trial of the effect of timing and mode of delivery on the completion and return of a self-assessment questionnaire. |
| Q45992249 | The NICOLA recruitment trial (NICOLA-RT): can you improve recruitment by making zero cost amendments to the invitation letter? |
| Q45992445 | The SWAT (study within a trial) programme; embedding trials to improve the methodological design and conduct of future research. |
| Q21128650 | The Use of Systematic Reviews and Other Research Evidence in Disasters and Related Areas: Preliminary Report of a Needs Assessment Survey |
| Q46418815 | The application of standardised diagnostic criteria in RCTS in depression. |
| Q37522571 | The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise |
| Q46744024 | The use of systematic reviews in the design of randomised trials |
| Q59304303 | The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials |
| Q24245587 | Time to publication for results of clinical trials |
| Q24197800 | Totally percutaneous versus standard femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair |
| Q24200231 | Totally percutaneous versus standard femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair |
| Q50309114 | Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)? |
| Q92476007 | Trial Forge Guidance 2: how to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed |
| Q45759903 | Trials trail a long tail |
| Q45991811 | What do young people really understand when completing questionnaires? Lessons learnt from developing a questionnaire to measure behavioural outcomes in a sexual health trial. |
| Q24188293 | Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane? |
| Q45992129 | “To have, to hold, from this day forward”: understanding current practice regarding the retention of trial participants. |
Search more.