Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations

scientific article published on 10 March 2020

Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.WNSX.2020.100076
P932PMC publication ID7322794
P698PubMed publication ID32613189

P2093author name stringFrancesco Costa
Mehmet Zileli
Oscar L Alves
Maurizio Fornari
Carla D Anania
P2860cites workOutcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical articleQ42663055
Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single centerQ44044352
Spinal stenosis. The narrow lumbar spinal canal syndromeQ44911771
Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.Q45185787
The impact of hypertension on the occurrence of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma following single level microscopic posterior lumbar decompression surgery in a single instituteQ47350870
Is Eighty the New Sixty? - Outcomes and Complications after Lumbar Decompression Surgery in Elderly Patients over 80 Years of Age.Q49391149
The treatment of spinal stenosisQ67754883
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompressionQ80184593
Incidental durotomy in degenerative lumbar spine surgery - a register study of 64,431 operationsQ91260171
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosisQ24186340
2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review GroupQ29619952
Obesity is associated with an increased rate of incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgeryQ30300935
The impact of incidental durotomy on the outcome of decompression surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data--a Swiss prospective multi-center cohort studyQ31080193
Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adultsQ33914457
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.Q34485527
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosisQ34752410
Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness studyQ35238572
Results of surgical treatment of idiopathic developmental stenosis of the lumbar vertebral canal. A review of twenty-seven years' experienceQ35437154
SPORT: Does incidental durotomy affect longterm outcomes in cases of spinal stenosis?Q35896194
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosisQ37033038
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatmentQ37559311
Incidental durotomy after spinal surgery: a prospective study in an academic institutionQ38005996
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update).Q38119639
Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgeryQ38149436
More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery: Let's tell someoneQ38268288
Predisposing factors for dural tear in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.Q38362907
Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current conceptsQ38596224
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Q38629865
The effect of incidental dural lesions on outcome after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: results of a multi-center study with 800 patients.Q38874515
Comparison of the Minimally Invasive and Conventional Open Surgery Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and a Meta-AnalysisQ39293233
Is minimally invasive surgery superior to open surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic reviewQ39401967
Complications in lumbar spine surgery: A retrospective analysisQ42558113
Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosisQ42618243
P921main subjectspinal stenosisQ1478321
P304page(s)100076
P577publication date2020-03-10
P1433published inWorld neurosurgery: XQ96321029
P1476titleDecompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations
P478volume7

Search more.