scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | Karthikeyan Gengaimuthu | |
P2860 | cites work | Association of Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies With Mortality and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | Q30248447 |
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Reduces the Need for Mechanical Ventilation in Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis | Q33693537 | ||
Predictors for an unsuccessful INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation procedure: a cohort study | Q33812145 | ||
European perspective on less invasive surfactant administration-a survey. | Q36220353 | ||
Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis | Q37248246 | ||
Nonintubated Surfactant Application vs Conventional Therapy in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Q38410231 | ||
Surfactant and noninvasive ventilation | Q38516210 | ||
Evolution of surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome: past, present, and future | Q38814650 | ||
Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Q39010408 | ||
Update of minimally invasive surfactant therapy | Q42376024 | ||
Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth | Q45209946 | ||
Five-country manikin study found that neonatologists preferred using the LISAcath rather than the Angiocath for less invasive surfactant administration | Q47662266 | ||
Rigid catheters reduced duration of less invasive surfactant therapy procedures in manikins. | Q47936488 | ||
Care of the Neonate on Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Bedside Guide | Q50048749 | ||
Less invasive surfactant administration and complications of preterm birth. | Q55064854 | ||
Loss of Surfacten® during bolus administration with a feeding catheter | Q63627712 | ||
Implementation of surfactant treatment during continuous positive airway pressure | Q80258186 | ||
Surfactant inadvertent loss using feeding catheters or endotracheal tubes | Q86780278 | ||
Less invasive surfactant administration: best practices and unanswered questions | Q89755493 | ||
Should Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy be a Must in Neonatal Intensive Care Units? Pilot Report of Initial Cases in Dubai | Q91066209 | ||
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy failure: risk factors and outcome | Q91623101 | ||
High-volume surfactant administration using a minimally invasive technique: Experience from a Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Unit | Q92402145 | ||
Survey of less Invasive Surfactant Administration in England, slow adoption and variable practice | Q93027095 | ||
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update | Q93030614 | ||
Novel Surfactant Administration Techniques: Will They Change Outcome? | Q93030641 | ||
Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy Using a 2.0 mm Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube as the Conduit: An Easily Adaptable Technique | Q93088816 | ||
P433 | issue | 6 | |
P304 | page(s) | e8455 | |
P577 | publication date | 2020-06-05 | |
P1433 | published in | Cureus | Q27725810 |
P1476 | title | Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy: An Analytical Report of Our Prospective Dubai Cohort | |
P478 | volume | 12 |