Assessing Public Opinion on CRISPR-Cas9: Combining Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning

scientific article published on 31 August 2020

Assessing Public Opinion on CRISPR-Cas9: Combining Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.2196/17830
P932PMC publication ID7490675
P698PubMed publication ID32865499

P50authorMarcel SalathéQ87339537
Manuel SchneiderQ92624141
Martin M MüllerQ92744244
Effy VayenaQ46003499
P2860cites workRepair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangementsQ61440674
Crowdbreaks: Tracking Health Trends Using Public Social Media Data and CrowdsourcingQ64119500
The media and public reaction to genetic researchQ77651702
Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editingQ92342177
CRISPR in the North American popular pressQ93042089
Shock greets claim of CRISPR-edited babiesQ93376658
CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in ProkaryotesQ21508827
Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modificationQ22065510
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotesQ22337358
RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9Q24598394
Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systemsQ24609428
Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeQ24652685
A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial ImmunityQ24669850
Engineering the provitamin A (beta-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endospermQ28142588
Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?Q28207744
Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleasesQ28297326
Chimeric nucleases stimulate gene targeting in human cellsQ29615384
A CRISPR New World: Attitudes in the Public toward Innovations in Human Genetic ModificationQ33711428
High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genomeQ34161708
Expression of bacterial genes in plant cellsQ34254794
Human insulin from recombinant DNA technologyQ34256121
Gene transfer into humans--immunotherapy of patients with advanced melanoma, using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes modified by retroviral gene transductionQ34354588
No time to waste--the ethical challenges created by CRISPR: CRISPR/Cas, being an efficient, simple, and cheap technology to edit the genome of any organism, raises many ethical and regulatory issues beyond the use to manipulate human germ line cellsQ36270836
Brave New GenomeQ41187825
CRISPR germline engineering--the community speaksQ41238392
Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryosQ45370513
Public views on gene editing and its uses.Q47620571
A Global Social Media Survey of Attitudes to Human Genome EditingQ50212970
A Need for Better Understanding Is the Major Determinant for Public Perceptions of Human Gene EditingQ57036762
Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcryQ59409366
Reasons for being in favour of or against genome modification: a survey of the Dutch general publicQ59782786
P433issue8
P921main subjectpublic opinionQ17946
deep learningQ197536
CRISPRQ412563
Cas9Q16965677
crowdsourcingQ275969
CRISPR-Cas methodQ17310682
P304page(s)e17830
P577publication date2020-08-31
P1433published inJournal of Medical Internet ResearchQ6295534
P1476titleAssessing Public Opinion on CRISPR-Cas9: Combining Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning
P478volume22

Search more.