scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P819 | ADS bibcode | 2015PNAS..11215343D |
P356 | DOI | 10.1073/PNAS.1516179112 |
P932 | PMC publication ID | 4687569 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 26553988 |
P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 283687081 |
P50 | author | Magnus Johannesson | Q18274567 |
Brian Nosek | Q22096791 | ||
Anna Dreber | Q29571082 | ||
Thomas Pfeiffer | Q55471853 | ||
Yiling Chen | Q59362859 | ||
Johan Almenberg | Q114572277 | ||
Siri Isaksson | Q114572278 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Brad Wilson | |
P2860 | cites work | Why most published research findings are false | Q21092395 |
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research | Q22348097 | ||
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant | Q24273231 | ||
An experiment on prediction markets in science | Q24288725 | ||
Social science. Promoting transparency in social science research. | Q24289118 | ||
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention | Q24289398 | ||
Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes | Q24606956 | ||
An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science | Q28264997 | ||
The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research | Q28548038 | ||
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Q28922478 | ||
Detecting the Snake in the Grass | Q29030754 | ||
Publication bias in clinical research | Q29541186 | ||
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience | Q29547474 | ||
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? | Q29547529 | ||
Social identity contingencies: how diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. | Q30368403 | ||
Stereotypes and retrieval-provoked illusory source recollections | Q30446114 | ||
Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation | Q30543750 | ||
Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors | Q33314605 | ||
Perceptual mechanisms that characterize gender differences in decoding women's sexual intent | Q33932230 | ||
Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgment: lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule-based analysis | Q34010249 | ||
Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis | Q34012625 | ||
The value of believing in free will: encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating | Q34734080 | ||
The threat of appearing prejudiced and race-based attentional biases | Q34749717 | ||
"In-group love" and "out-group hate" as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: a new game paradigm | Q34768839 | ||
Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects | Q36246225 | ||
Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink | Q37347981 | ||
Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review | Q38168642 | ||
The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. | Q38390646 | ||
On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. | Q38390650 | ||
Preschoolers' perspective taking in word learning: do they blindly follow eye gaze? | Q38391829 | ||
Intentional forgetting is easier after two "shots" than one. | Q38391841 | ||
Priming addition facts with semantic relations | Q38391856 | ||
Now you see it, now you don't: repetition blindness for nonwords | Q38392848 | ||
Contextual effects on reading aloud: evidence for pathway control | Q38392857 | ||
Self-handicapping, excuse making, and counterfactual thinking: consequences for self-esteem and future motivation | Q40065233 | ||
Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment | Q42601108 | ||
Scientific method: statistical errors | Q46088894 | ||
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability | Q47701260 | ||
Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks | Q47720649 | ||
Loving those who justify inequality: the effects of system threat on attraction to women who embody benevolent sexist ideals | Q47722573 | ||
Psychology. Replication effort provokes praise--and 'bullying' charges | Q48075577 | ||
Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the domain of correspondent outcomes: the roles of relativistic concern, perceived categorization, and the doctrine of mutual assured destruction | Q48359233 | ||
The effects of an implemental mind-set on attitude strength | Q48359256 | ||
Self-regulation and selective exposure: the impact of depleted self-regulation resources on confirmatory information processing | Q48359263 | ||
The face of success: inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits | Q48360442 | ||
Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation | Q48364456 | ||
A needs-based model of reconciliation: satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation | Q48366777 | ||
Psychology research. Psychology's bold initiative | Q48460884 | ||
Working memory costs of task switching | Q49025550 | ||
"Walking on eggshells": how expressing relationship insecurities perpetuates them. | Q50782114 | ||
The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making. | Q50875827 | ||
The best men are (not always) already taken: female preference for single versus attached males depends on conception risk. | Q51715305 | ||
Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). | Q51893891 | ||
Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information. | Q51894741 | ||
The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. | Q51961293 | ||
Multidimensional visual statistical learning. | Q51962868 | ||
Adaptive memory: the comparative value of survival processing. | Q51964331 | ||
Head up, foot down: object words orient attention to the objects' typical location. | Q51964334 | ||
A single-system account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency. | Q51967250 | ||
An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning. | Q51967254 | ||
Prediction Markets | Q55903482 | ||
Editorial Policy on Candidate Gene Association and Candidate Gene-by-Environment Interaction Studies of Complex Traits | Q56806915 | ||
Could gambling save science? Encouraging an honest consensus | Q61329455 | ||
1/f noise and effort on implicit measures of bias | Q80456691 | ||
Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment | Q80490148 | ||
The cost of lower self-esteem: testing a self- and social-bonds model of health | Q80729944 | ||
Economics. The promise of prediction markets | Q81296960 | ||
P433 | issue | 50 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | reproducibility | Q1425625 |
P304 | page(s) | 15343-15347 | |
P577 | publication date | 2015-11-09 | |
P1433 | published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | Q1146531 |
P1476 | title | Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research | |
P478 | volume | 112 |
Q81747275 | A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science |
Q98894183 | Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme |
Q38934243 | Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence |
Q38659400 | Bayesian markets to elicit private information |
Q39544876 | Biases encountered in long-term monitoring studies of invertebrates and microflora: Australian examples of protocols, personnel, tools and site location |
Q33852829 | Can cancer researchers accurately judge whether preclinical reports will reproduce? |
Q28597738 | Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility |
Q58744983 | Estimating statistical power, posterior probability and publication bias of psychological research using the observed replication rate |
Q38759980 | Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics |
Q57344757 | Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 |
Q91901137 | In situ measurement of cesium-137 contamination in fruits from the northern Marshall Islands |
Q92740096 | Low replicability can support robust and efficient science |
Q91830167 | Making prepublication independent replication mainstream |
Q24289245 | Markets for replication |
Q99544121 | Meta Research: Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability |
Q58610850 | P in the right place: Revisiting the evidential value of P-values |
Q91722325 | Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments |
Q56142179 | Redefine statistical significance |
Q65002550 | Rejection odds and rejection ratios: A proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses. |
Q97075668 | Replications in Comparative Cognition: What Should We Expect and How Can We Improve? |
Q61799268 | The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative |
Q38709617 | The Heuristic Value of p in Inductive Statistical Inference |
Q28314781 | The power of prediction markets |
Q64272799 | Understanding of researcher behavior is required to improve data reliability |
Q96127988 | Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams |
Search more.