What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition

scientific article

What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P356DOI10.1098/RSTB.2011.0420
P3181OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID1320165
P932PMC publication ID3318766
P698PubMed publication ID22492752
P5875ResearchGate publication ID223974151

P50authorChris D. FrithQ1077217
Geraint ReesQ5548822
Andreas RoepstorffQ23889316
Dan BangQ41044654
Karsten OlsenQ64029368
P2093author name stringB. Bahrami
P2860cites workThe ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integrationQ28242278
Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codesQ28270009
The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional statesQ28281710
Optimally Interacting MindsQ29468525
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashionQ29614805
The computation of social behaviorQ33455344
Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: implications for measures of awarenessQ33743780
SOCIAL FACILITATION.Q34260231
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effectQ34629195
The neural basis of decision making.Q34643563
Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertaintyQ34725684
Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex.Q34979761
Group performance and decision makingQ35639066
Together, slowly but surely: the role of social interaction and feedback on the build-up of benefit in collective decision-makingQ35710277
Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoringQ35868316
Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decisionQ35919156
Neural correlates of mentalizing-related computations during strategic interactions in humansQ36638640
Associative learning of social valueQ37020558
Herding in humansQ37596143
Kinds of access: different methods for report reveal different kinds of metacognitive accessQ38001663
A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.Q38001665
Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliabilityQ42684830
Measuring consciousness: is one measure better than the other?Q45778728
Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-makingQ46099643
Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguityQ48635027
Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.Q50794975
Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence.Q51620508
Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes.Q51642792
Limits on introspection: distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck.Q51874452
Limits on theory of mind use in adults.Q51947452
Random-walk and accumulator models of psychophysical discrimination: a critical evaluation.Q52277761
Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integrationQ55879820
Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafingQ56457113
Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a TheoryQ56545275
Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury TheoremQ56568396
Vox PopuliQ56873889
Evidence for an Accumulator Model of Psychophysical DiscriminationQ59410686
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidenceQ62113249
Signal-detection analysis of group decision makingQ73522758
The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisionsQ81556992
Behavior. Decisions made betterQ84961203
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 UnportedQ14947546
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue1594
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectdecision makingQ1331926
cognitionQ2200417
psychological modelQ65559775
biomedical investigative techniqueQ66648976
P304page(s)1350-65
P577publication date2012-05-19
P1433published inPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society BQ2153239
P1476titleWhat failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition
P478volume367

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38001665A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.
Q99560701A new measure of group decision-making efficiency
Q37117692Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy
Q44412092Can Limitations of Visuospatial Attention Be Circumvented? A Review
Q92891708Collective benefit in joint perceptual judgments: Partial roles of shared environments, meta-cognition, and feedback
Q36714198Collective enumeration
Q59809268Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports
Q39823367Does interaction matter? Testing whether a confidence heuristic can replace interaction in collective decision-making
Q35229498Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures
Q55510700Inferring subjective states through the observation of actions.
Q35063915Learning to make collective decisions: the impact of confidence escalation
Q41580524Making better decisions in groups
Q89858930Mentalizing during social InterAction: A four component model
Q41993104Metacognition and reasoning
Q42558371Metacognition: computation, biology and function
Q47131105Neural computations underpinning the strategic management of influence in advice giving
Q35987167Oxytocin Effect on Collective Decision Making: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study
Q90215254Shared responsibility in collective decisions
Q30841881Signatures of a Statistical Computation in the Human Sense of Confidence
Q47157211The Neural Basis of Changing Social Norms through Persuasion
Q49893919The idiosyncratic nature of confidence.
Q60483641The perceptual and social components of metacognition
Q38021768The role of metacognition in human social interactions
Q33627926Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task
Q39696328Undecidability and opacity of metacognition in animals and humans
Q35855819What's in a Friendship? Partner Visibility Supports Cognitive Collaboration between Friends

Search more.