Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task

scientific article

Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00669
P932PMC publication ID5413551
P698PubMed publication ID28515704

P2093author name stringPeter König
Alan Kingstone
Basil Wahn
P2860cites workWhat failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognitionQ27026278
Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brainsQ28361259
The role of shared visual information for joint action coordinationQ28597502
Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tappingQ28778233
Optimally Interacting MindsQ29468525
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-dataQ29615918
Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual searchQ30525382
Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integrationQ30525384
Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?Q34555998
Together, slowly but surely: the role of social interaction and feedback on the build-up of benefit in collective decision-makingQ35710277
Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attentionQ36161730
Pupil Sizes Scale with Attentional Load and Task Experience in a Multiple Object Tracking TaskQ36225160
Attentional Resource Allocation in Visuotactile Processing Depends on the Task, But Optimal Visuotactile Integration Does Not Depend on Attentional ResourcesQ36661055
Two is better than one: physical interactions improve motor performance in humansQ37507013
Auditory Stimulus Detection Partially Depends on Visuospatial Attentional Resources.Q37632275
Synchronised and complementary coordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming taskQ37762816
Mechanisms of social cognitionQ37916577
Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with OthersQ39094268
Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory controlQ40559257
How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanismQ46903745
Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordinationQ48527754
Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional LoadQ48656098
Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.Q48951758
Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.Q50794975
Investigating Conversational Dynamics: Interactive Alignment, Interpersonal Synergy, and Collective Task Performance.Q50917028
When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition.Q51771422
Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signalsQ70368533
Coordinating cognition: the costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative searchQ80581551
Joint action: bodies and minds moving togetherQ82235267
Coordinating spatial referencing using shared gazeQ82242582
Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordinationQ83644735
Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint actionQ85636303
The dynamic effect of reading direction habit on spatial asymmetry of image perceptionQ88301617
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)669
P577publication date2017-05-03
P1433published inFrontiers in PsychologyQ2794477
P1476titleTwo Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task
P478volume8