When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition.

scientific article published in August 2015

When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1041877171
P356DOI10.3758/S13423-014-0765-4
P698PubMed publication ID25416077
P5875ResearchGate publication ID268790145

P50authorJames T. EnnsQ47885680
P2093author name stringAllison A Brennan
P2860cites workInterhemispheric neural summation in the absence of the corpus callosumQ48380562
Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.Q50794975
When are two heads better than one and why?Q51378081
Testing the race model inequality: an algorithm and computer programs.Q51908074
Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time.Q51951818
Vox PopuliQ56873889
Grabbing Your Ear: Rapid Auditory–Somatosensory Multisensory Interactions in Low-level Sensory Cortices Are Not Constrained by Stimulus AlignmentQ57785470
Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signalsQ70368533
Exaggerated redundancy gain in the split brain: a hemispheric coactivation accountQ80436410
Coordinating cognition: the costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative searchQ80581551
Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movementsQ81575025
Optimally Interacting MindsQ29468525
A perceptually completed whole is less than the sum of its partsQ34459328
The wisdom of many in one mind: improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping.Q34930334
Together, slowly but surely: the role of social interaction and feedback on the build-up of benefit in collective decision-makingQ35710277
When less equals more: Probability summation without sensitivity improvementQ38253081
Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memoryQ38553715
P433issue4
P921main subjectcollaborationQ1145523
P304page(s)1076-1082
P577publication date2015-08-01
P1433published inPsychonomic Bulletin and ReviewQ15763410
P1476titleWhen two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition.
P478volume22

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q99560701A new measure of group decision-making efficiency
Q27316014Boosting medical diagnostics by pooling independent judgments
Q49077862But is it social? How to tell when groups are more than the sum of their members
Q44412092Can Limitations of Visuospatial Attention Be Circumvented? A Review
Q53631545Cognitive continuum theory in interprofessional healthcare: A critical analysis.
Q38411921Collective behaviour, uncertainty and environmental change.
Q59127008Complexity on the Menu and in the Meal
Q55313084Let's Move It Together: A Review of Group Benefits in Joint Object Control.
Q47735212Performance similarities predict collective benefits in dyadic and triadic joint visual search.
Q92294933Possibilities for interprofessional learning at a Swedish acute healthcare ward not dedicated to interprofessional education: an ethnographic study
Q57799408Social modulation of object-directed but not image-directed actions
Q55364269The Influence of Co-action on a Simple Attention Task: A Shift Back to the Status Quo.
Q64105013The Social Situation Affects How We Process Feedback About Our Actions
Q60483641The perceptual and social components of metacognition
Q38793792The wisdom of crowds for visual search
Q33627926Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task
Q35855819What's in a Friendship? Partner Visibility Supports Cognitive Collaboration between Friends

Search more.