| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Pieter R. Roelfsema | Q41044081 |
| P2093 | author name string | Roos Houtkamp | |
| P2860 | cites work | SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION | Q28202383 |
| The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity | Q28213950 | ||
| The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects | Q28240108 | ||
| Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? | Q28249105 | ||
| High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory | Q28257618 | ||
| Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex | Q28266250 | ||
| Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention | Q28292891 | ||
| Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age | Q29543437 | ||
| Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes | Q30559471 | ||
| Visual search and attention: a signal detection theory approach | Q34362071 | ||
| The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions | Q34447907 | ||
| Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks | Q35438449 | ||
| Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? | Q36103104 | ||
| Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention. | Q36992067 | ||
| Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. | Q38403483 | ||
| A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. | Q38502205 | ||
| Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck | Q42665230 | ||
| How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search | Q44831839 | ||
| Looking for two targets at the same time: one search or two? | Q46079147 | ||
| Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search | Q46405030 | ||
| A detection theory account of change detection | Q46603588 | ||
| Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: an examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. | Q47195918 | ||
| The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search | Q48449798 | ||
| Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. | Q48920452 | ||
| Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. | Q51992855 | ||
| Visual search within and across dimensions: a case for within-dimension grouping. | Q52014492 | ||
| Parallel processing in visual short-term memory. | Q52049300 | ||
| Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. | Q52216692 | ||
| Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search | Q55982827 | ||
| Simultaneous discrimination of the spatial frequency and contrast of periodic stimuli | Q70661541 | ||
| The guidance of eye movements during active visual search | Q77496067 | ||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 317-326 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2008-07-30 | |
| P1433 | published in | Psychological Research | Q15756639 |
| P1476 | title | Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time. | |
| P478 | volume | 73 |
| Q41839254 | Attentional control via parallel target-templates in dual-target search |
| Q48249591 | Building blocks of visual working memory: objects or Boolean maps? |
| Q50213636 | Capture by colour: evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture |
| Q90010171 | Concurrent evaluation of independently cued features during perceptual decisions and saccadic targeting in visual search |
| Q38537621 | EPS Mid-Career Award 2014. The control of attention in visual search: Cognitive and neural mechanisms |
| Q42395795 | Faster than the speed of rejection: Object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets. |
| Q83229286 | Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects |
| Q48262385 | Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes |
| Q38702560 | Lack of Free Choice Reveals the Cost of Having to Search for More Than One Object |
| Q50522880 | Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors. |
| Q50437128 | Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory |
| Q28608093 | Modality-specific attention in foraging bumblebees |
| Q48090884 | Monkey prefrontal neurons during Sternberg task performance: full contents of working memory or most recent item? |
| Q31169732 | Preparatory attention in visual cortex. |
| Q57062126 | Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory |
| Q38669153 | Reward Selectively Modulates the Lingering Neural Representation of Recently Attended Objects in Natural Scenes |
| Q57819875 | Reward differentially interacts with physical salience in feature-based attention |
| Q38518238 | Saved by a log: how do humans perform hybrid visual and memory search? |
| Q37245618 | Searching for something familiar or novel: top-down attentional selection of specific items or object categories |
| Q37318307 | Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes |
| Q43094909 | Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search |
| Q38482579 | Task demands determine the specificity of the search template |
| Q48455301 | The Control of Single-color and Multiple-color Visual Search by Attentional Templates in Working Memory and in Long-term Memory. |
| Q88305325 | The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention |
| Q39329072 | The costs of switching attentional sets |
| Q37578402 | The effect of visual salience on memory-based choices |
| Q50712777 | The influence of cognitive load on spatial search performance. |
| Q35855819 | What's in a Friendship? Partner Visibility Supports Cognitive Collaboration between Friends |
| Q51771422 | When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition. |
Search more.