Women's experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing

scientific article

Women's experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1052789504
P356DOI10.1186/S12885-015-1804-X
P932PMC publication ID4634718
P698PubMed publication ID26536865
P5875ResearchGate publication ID283526349

P50authorDallas R. EnglishQ40580176
Julia M L BrothertonQ87723655
Farhana SultanaQ90402760
Dorota M. GertigQ114387202
P2093author name stringJulie A Simpson
C David Wrede
Marion Saville
Robyn Mullins
Stella Heley
Kelly T Drennan
P2860cites workMethods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic reviewQ30540772
The effect of self-sampled HPV testing on participation to cervical cancer screening in Italy: a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN96071600)Q34543764
HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening - a randomised controlled trialQ34727346
Rationale and design of the iPap trial: a randomized controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for improving participation in cervical screening by never- and under-screened women in AustraliaQ35124750
Self-sampling and HPV testing or ordinary Pap-smear in women not regularly attending screening: a randomised studyQ35212627
High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screeningQ38036140
Self-collected HPV testing improves participation in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Q38101700
Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trialsQ38160099
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysisQ38179114
Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based surveyQ39912037
Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the NetherlandsQ40305077
Women's views on human papillomavirus self-sampling: focus groups to assess acceptability, invitation letters and a test kit in the Australian settingQ40885443
Comparative performance of novel self-sampling methods in detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in 30,130 women not attending cervical screening.Q42212838
Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch womenQ63914820
Self-sampling experiences among non-attendees to cervical screeningQ85681156
Self-sampling for cervical screening: could it overcome some of the barriers to the Pap test?Q85778724
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectPapillomavirusQ1137717
P304page(s)849
P577publication date2015-11-04
P1433published inBMC CancerQ326300
P1476titleWomen's experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing
P478volume15

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q58001338A contemporary framework of health equity applied to gynecologic cancer care: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review
Q38739053A pilot study of community-based self-sampling for HPV testing among non-attenders of cervical cancer screening programs in El Salvador
Q91996765Age-related acceptability of vaginal self-sampling in cervical cancer screening at two university hospitals: a pilot cross-sectional study
Q40727294Assessing Acceptability of Self-Sampling Kits, Prevalence, and Risk Factors for Human Papillomavirus Infection in American Indian Women
Q92233032Australian women's self-perceived barriers to participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review
Q38884083Clinician and Patient Acceptability of Self-Collected Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening
Q91797606Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of
Q92477792Cost-effectiveness studies of HPV self-sampling: A systematic review
Q92063360Evaluation of satisfaction with three different cervical cancer screening modalities: clinician-collected Pap test vs. HPV test by self-sampling vs. HPV test by urine sampling
Q61446811Evaluation of the self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia
Q91759512Experience with HPV self-sampling and clinician-based sampling in women attending routine cervical screening in the Netherlands
Q90805909HPV-based cervical screening: Rationale, expectations and future perspectives of the new Dutch screening programme
Q55077396Implementation considerations using HPV self-collection to reach women under-screened for cervical cancer in high-income settings.
Q91116235Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial
Q64135696Results of a Pilot Study of a Mail-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-Testing Program for Underscreened Women From Appalachian Ohio
Q54229599Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Increased Cervical Cancer Screening Participation and Incorporation in International Screening Programs.
Q36327034The acceptability of vaginal smear self-collection for screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review
Q52573825Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.
Q96016363Women's attitudes and understanding of cervical cancer and the new National Cervical Screening Program

Search more.