Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial

scientific article published on 15 January 2019

Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30763-0
P698PubMed publication ID30658933

P50authorChris J L M MeijerQ90379336
Peter J F SnijdersQ90768556
Willem MelchersQ56859383
Daniëlle A M HeidemanQ90379334
P2093author name stringLeon F A G Massuger
Johannes Berkhof
Ruud L M Bekkers
Folkert J van Kemenade
Wim G V Quint
Renée M F Ebisch
Anco C Molijn
Nicole J Polman
P2860cites workWomen's experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testingQ27311434
Eurogin 2016 Roadmap: how HPV knowledge is changing screening practiceQ30239987
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaborationQ30274888
Non-inferiority and superiority tests for partially matched data when a constraint is placed on the number of new testsQ30579744
HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort studyQ33721970
Improved sensitivity of vaginal self-collection and high-risk human papillomavirus testingQ33918589
The effect of self-sampled HPV testing on participation to cervical cancer screening in Italy: a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN96071600)Q34543764
High concordance of results of testing for human papillomavirus in cervicovaginal samples collected by two methods, with comparison of a novel self-sampling device to a conventional endocervical brushQ34720012
The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996.Q35587534
Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening methodQ35742384
A general primer GP5+/GP6(+)-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapingsQ36543787
Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and olderQ37461977
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysisQ38179114
Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.Q38571169
Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus in Self-Taken Samples from Screening Nonattenders.Q40116201
A randomized controlled trial in non-responders from Newcastle upon Tyne invited to return a self-sample for Human Papillomavirus testing versus repeat invitation for cervical screeningQ41658208
Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial.Q42262377
A novel design for estimating relative accuracy of screening tests when complete disease verification is not feasibleQ45302196
High-risk human papillomavirus detection in self-sampling compared to physician-taken smear in a responder population of the Dutch cervical screening: Results of the VERA study.Q50853405
Comparison of HPV-based assays with Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening in Morelos State, MexicoQ58504458
Three-tiered score for Ki-67 and p16 improves accuracy and reproducibility of grading CIN lesionsQ59356826
Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trialQ61626075
Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch womenQ63914820
High risk human papillomavirus in women with normal cervical cytology prior to the development of abnormal cytology and colposcopyQ73824709
P433issue2
P921main subjectcervical intraepithelial neoplasiaQ196788
P304page(s)229-238
P577publication date2019-01-15
P1433published inLancet Oncology CommissionQ13747613
P1476titlePerformance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial
P478volume20

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q64080785Cross-sectional study of HPV testing in self-sampled urine and comparison with matched vaginal and cervical samples in women attending colposcopy for the management of abnormal cervical screening
Q91759512Experience with HPV self-sampling and clinician-based sampling in women attending routine cervical screening in the Netherlands
Q99564269Extended HPV genotyping to compare HPV type-distribution in self and provider-collected samples for cervical cancer screening
Q92593211HPV self-testing for primary cervical cancer screening in Madagascar: VIA/VILI triage compliance in HPV-positive women
Q89695844High-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in self-collected cervicovaginal specimens from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative women and women living with HIV living in Botswana
Q91841838Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020-99: a modelling study
Q91910518Introduction of primary screening using high-risk HPV DNA detection in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study
Q92639475Long-term CIN3+ risk of HPV positive women after triage with FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis
Q91116249Self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for HPV testing

Search more.