Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium

scientific article (publication date: March 2009)

Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.GIE.2008.08.034
P3181OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID2065186
P932PMC publication ID2749320
P698PubMed publication ID19251005
P5875ResearchGate publication ID24169827

P50authorGlenn M EisenQ130280310
Douglas O FaigelQ56106782
P2093author name stringRobert Smith
David A Lieberman
Nora Mattek
Judith R Logan
Cynthia Morris
Jennifer Holub
Marion Nadel
P2860cites workAnalysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention TrialQ81504580
Quality indicators for colonoscopyQ82971535
Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomasQ28200368
Celecoxib for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polypsQ28200375
Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physiciansQ30483281
Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening PracticesQ30815761
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableQ31110735
Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study GroupQ33898657
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ34136658
Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidenceQ34173853
The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect.Q34214275
Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network.Q34508312
Quality indicators for colonoscopyQ34517049
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopyQ34590728
Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery systemQ34592874
A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopyQ36859888
Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancersQ38435356
Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopyQ40291776
Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortiumQ43459096
Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.Q45190337
Can ASA grade or Goldman's cardiac risk index predict peri-operative mortality? A study of 16,227 patients.Q51546819
Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.Q52957499
Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.Q53597286
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.Q53625977
Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasiaQ57121896
Colorectal Cancer in Patients Under Close Colonoscopic SurveillanceQ57780625
CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus ProposalQ57944377
How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacityQ64132816
Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findingsQ74016710
Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopyQ77699498
Perforation During Colonoscopy in Endoscopic Ambulatory Surgical CentersQ79102845
Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasiaQ79323298
Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopyQ79437609
Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screeningQ79770419
Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomyQ80458384
P433issue3 Pt 2
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcolonoscopyQ840387
multicenter clinical trialQ6934595
P304page(s)645-53
P577publication date2009-03-01
P1433published inGastrointestinal EndoscopyQ15724481
P1476titleAssessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium
P478volume69

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q26742096A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting
Q33772031A primer on endoscopic electronic medical records
Q37372563A wide variation of the quality of colonoscopy reporting system in the real clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea
Q37367838Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures
Q35775961Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
Q33922631Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness
Q37796359Colonoscopy Reports and Current State of Performance Measures
Q26865934Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation
Q34417020Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication
Q28394901Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures
Q34749195Development and validation of the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) for assessment of procedural sedation quality
Q34773544Diversity of endoscopy center operations and practice variation across California's safety-net hospital system: a statewide survey
Q37075980Endoscopy reporting standards
Q47947092GRG Profiles: David A. Lieberman
Q36051453Impact of the 2008-2009 economic recession on screening colonoscopy utilization among the insured
Q36370511Influence of patient age and colorectal polyp size on histopathology findings
Q84814924Isn't it time to stop talking about colonoscopy quality and start doing something about it?
Q33855669Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center
Q38180957Location, size, and distance: criteria for quality in esophagogastroduodenos copy reporting for pre-operative gastric cancer evaluation
Q51541649Opinion of gastroenterologists towards quality assurance in endoscopy
Q44594370Pitfalls of using administrative data for research
Q34554221Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees
Q50872549Prevalence and predictive factors of the need for surgery for advanced colorectal adenoma.
Q34169873Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program
Q36105537Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia
Q54381395Quality colonoscopy: assumptions and expectations
Q42170788Quality indicators in colonoscopy practice
Q37778713Quality measures and credentialing in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Q37688346Quality metrics in endoscopy
Q52672694Quality of Endoscopy Reports for Esophageal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?
Q38281689Quality of colonoscopy and advances in detection of colorectal lesions: a current overview
Q34923030Quality of colonoscopy reporting in community practice
Q38801697Recommendations for Quality Colonoscopy Reporting for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results from a RAND Appropriateness Panel.
Q39909070Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality
Q91668898Standardising assessment and documentation of pouchoscopy
Q36921916The Polyp Manager: a new tool for optimal polyp documentation during colonoscopy. A pilot study
Q30489780The Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting in Usual Practice: Are Endoscopists Reporting Key Data Elements?
Q37796361The Use of Databases and Registries to Enhance Colonoscopy Quality
Q53378920The cap-assisted technique enhances colonoscopy training: prospective randomized study of six trainees.
Q37433598The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging
Q51277674Which should go first during same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy? A randomized prospective study focusing on colonoscopy performance.

Search more.