The Use of Databases and Registries to Enhance Colonoscopy Quality

scientific article published on September 1, 2010

The Use of Databases and Registries to Enhance Colonoscopy Quality is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.GIEC.2010.07.007
P953full work available at URLhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1052515710000930?httpAccept=text/plain
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1052515710000930?httpAccept=text/xml
P698PubMed publication ID20889074

P2093author name stringDavid A. Lieberman
Judith R. Logan
P2860cites workAssessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortiumQ28751392
Using a clinical data repository to estimate the frequency and costs of adverse drug eventsQ30308660
Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic frameworkQ30739868
Measuring the quality of diabetes care using administrative data: is there bias?Q30887750
Standardizing laboratory data by mapping to LOINC.Q31033016
Are claims data accurate enough to identify patients for performance measures or quality improvement? The case of diabetes, heart disease, and depression.Q31049087
Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measuresQ31070672
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableQ31110735
Patterns of endoscopy in the United States: analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Endoscopic DatabaseQ31142186
Use of electronic medical record data for quality improvement in schizophrenia treatmentQ33203597
Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review.Q33262300
Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.Q33479455
The STS National Database: current changes and challenges for the new millennium. Committee to Establish a National Database in Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.Q33897030
Development of the Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes (LOINC) vocabularyQ33950841
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ34136658
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study WorkgroupQ34728738
Cross sectional survey of multicentre clinical databases in the United KingdomQ34842569
Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancerQ34901870
Directory of clinical databases: improving and promoting their useQ35526459
Electronic health record systems: the vehicle for implementing performance measuresQ36110457
Measuring performance directly using the veterans health administration electronic medical record: a comparison with external peer reviewQ36285954
Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic reviewQ36518855
Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health recordQ36652674
Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedbackQ36672017
Facilitating Clinical Outcomes Assessment through the automated identification of quality measures for prostate cancer surgeryQ36696018
Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processingQ36698439
Automated review of electronic health records to assess quality of care for outpatients with heart failureQ36740104
Assessing quality using administrative dataQ36893036
A framework for capturing clinical data sets from computerized sourcesQ36893041
Using technology to promote gastrointestinal outcomes research: a case for electronic health recordsQ37290137
Using electronic health records to measure physician performance for acute conditions in primary care: empirical evaluation of the community-acquired pneumonia clinical quality measure set.Q37377306
Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databasesQ37493175
The value of administrative databasesQ42785822
The performance of performance measurementQ43059270
Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume with processes of care, mortality, morbidity, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite quality scoreQ43587255
Detecting possible vaccine adverse events in clinical notes of the electronic medical record.Q45945092
The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United StatesQ50113541
The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006.Q50785635
Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes researchQ72030547
The enormous burden of digestive diseases on our healthcare systemQ73112475
Administrative data. Baby or bathwater?Q74050728
GI Epidemiology: databases for epidemiological studiesQ79576831
Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: part 2--Statistical considerations in composite measure scoring and provider ratingQ80031466
Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: part 1--Conceptual framework and measure selectionQ80031469
Finally present on admission but needs attentionQ80318604
Improving hypertension quality measurement using electronic health recordsQ83578955
P433issue4
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectdatabaseQ8513
colonoscopyQ840387
P304page(s)717-734
P577publication date2010-09-01
P1433published inGastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North AmericaQ26842413
P1476titleThe use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality
The Use of Databases and Registries to Enhance Colonoscopy Quality
P478volume20