Teleoanalysis: combining data from different types of study

scientific article

Teleoanalysis: combining data from different types of study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJ.327.7415.616
P932PMC publication ID194099
P698PubMed publication ID12969936
P5875ResearchGate publication ID10571229

P2093author name stringJoan K Morris
Nicholas J Wald
P2860cites workDietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic reviewQ28361678
Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart diseaseQ29391703
Neural-tube defectsQ33772419
Quantifying the effect of folic acidQ34469951
Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: data from the BUPA studyQ36743999
By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?Q36884264
Folic acid and the prevention of neural tube defectsQ40908039
Folate levels and neural tube defects. Implications for preventionQ71516278
P433issue7415
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P1104number of pages3
P304page(s)616-618
P577publication date2003-09-01
P1433published inThe BMJQ546003
P1476titleTeleoanalysis: combining data from different types of study
P478volume327

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38569364A journey into clinical evidence: from case reports to mixed treatment comparisons
Q34019310A manifesto for clinical pharmacology from principles to practice
Q83502017Adverse drug reactions
Q24670053Anecdotes that provide definitive evidence
Q46612312De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions
Q46884329Detection of spironolactone-associated hyperkalaemia following the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES).
Q28750270Evaluating the causal relevance of diverse risk markers: horizontal systematic review
Q57286518Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
Q80791998Gold standards in pharmacovigilance: the use of definitive anecdotal reports of adverse drug reactions as pure gold and high-grade ore
Q47213346How should we evaluate research on counselling and the treatment of depression? A case study on how the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's draft 2018 guideline for depression considered what counts as best evidence
Q40028428Multiparameter evidence synthesis in epidemiology and medical decision-making
Q26801502State of the Art on the Evidence Base in Cardiac Regenerative Therapy: Overview of 41 Systematic Reviews
Q33994300Systematic review to support the development of nutrient reference intake values: challenges and solutions
Q28218100Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach
Q24650519The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's 'guidelines for causation' contribute?
Q38505127Toward standardized reporting of drug interactions: the READI checklist for anecdotal reports
Q30239838Validation and calibration of structural models that combine information from multiple sources
Q21198836Why do we need Cases Journal?

Search more.