Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics.

scientific article

Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P819ADS bibcode2007PLoSO...2.1336F
P356DOI10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0001336
P932PMC publication ID2129119
P698PubMed publication ID18092002
P5875ResearchGate publication ID5757032

P50authorDavid W. FranklinQ41045399
Etienne BurdetQ61809675
P2093author name stringMitsuo Kawato
Udell So
P2860cites workThe assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventoryQ26778476
An internal model for sensorimotor integrationQ28290085
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashionQ29614805
Interaction of Visual and Proprioceptive Feedback During Adaptation of Human Reaching MovementsQ30474056
The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedanceQ34102953
Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacementQ34188014
Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humansQ34340759
Consolidation in human motor memoryQ34389627
Neural averaging in motor learningQ34571549
Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb positionQ35622380
Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planningQ36881877
Long-latency stretch reflexes as co-ordinated functional responses in man.Q41421629
Quantitative evaluation of the electromyographic responses to multidirectional load perturbations of the human arm.Q41437308
The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematicsQ41893288
Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environmentQ46416830
Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor taskQ48126188
Proprioceptive coordination of movement sequences: role of velocity and position informationQ48130313
Different mechanisms involved in adaptation to stable and unstable dynamicsQ48146058
Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movementsQ48232218
Differential contributions of vision and proprioception to movement accuracyQ48268851
Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamicsQ48292123
Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without visionQ48374741
Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulusQ48401440
Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the handQ48401447
Modular decomposition in visuomotor learningQ48760548
Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movementQ48772547
Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements.Q50803665
Stability and motor adaptation in human arm movements.Q51322541
Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment.Q51980739
Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.Q51997306
Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand.Q52002996
Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.Q52014658
Impedance control balances stability with metabolically costly muscle activation.Q52089116
On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.Q52091876
Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.Q52097835
Quantization of human motions and learning of accurate movements.Q52186333
The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.Q52193843
Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination.Q52210440
Task-dependent viscoelasticity of human multijoint arm and its spatial characteristics for interaction with environments.Q52233539
A method for measuring endpoint stiffness during multi-joint arm movements.Q52541101
Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans.Q52660825
The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control.Q52679597
Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent.Q53660205
Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy.Q55064773
When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor AdaptationQ57398615
The curvature of human arm movements in the absence of visual experienceQ60465040
Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movementsQ68476249
Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errorsQ72150804
Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioceptionQ72261586
Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectoryQ72816442
Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movementsQ73054576
Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouseQ73666133
Electromyographic responses to a mechanical perturbation applied during impending arm movements in different directions: one-joint and two-joint conditionsQ74060585
Context estimation for sensorimotor controlQ74153572
Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported modelQ74620739
Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movementsQ79750027
Visual feedback control of hand movementsQ79851483
Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation studyQ80166128
Determinants of offline processing of visual information for the control of reaching movementsQ80250621
Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation studyQ81403555
Impedance is modulated to meet accuracy demands during goal-directed arm movementsQ82056401
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue12
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)e1336
P577publication date2007-12-19
P1433published inPLOS OneQ564954
P1476titleVisual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics
P478volume2

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q30380767Adaptive tuning functions arise from visual observation of past movement.
Q51713399Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching.
Q33559339Communication and Inference of Intended Movement Direction during Human-Human Physical Interaction
Q48180972Developmental aspects of pluriarticular movement control
Q33400366Differences in context and feedback result in different trajectories and adaptation strategies in reaching
Q53114824Effect of cooling foot sole skin receptors on achilles tendon reflex.
Q33727300Effect of tonic pain on motor acquisition and retention while learning to reach in a force field
Q51833509Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.
Q85901644Effects of visual feedback absence on force control during isometric contraction
Q37346238Experimental measure of arm stiffness during single reaching movements with a time-frequency analysis.
Q47758998Highlights from the 2017 meeting of the Society for Neural Control of Movement (Dublin, Ireland).
Q35543989Impedance control is selectively tuned to multiple directions of movement
Q42155558Improving Robot Motor Learning with Negatively Valenced Reinforcement Signals
Q30406610Inter-limb interference during bimanual adaptation to dynamic environments.
Q87978877Is visual-based, online control of manual-aiming movements disturbed when adapting to new movement dynamics?
Q90183233Learning and adaptation in speech production without a vocal tract
Q56420758Learning control in robot-assisted rehabilitation of motor skills – a review
Q51856576Minimally assistive robot training for proprioception enhancement.
Q61630075Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy
Q48433882Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation.
Q48292350Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals
Q63982083Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position
Q34488117Somatosensory comparison during haptic tracing
Q89938806Stochastic optimal open-loop control as a theory of force and impedance planning via muscle co-contraction
Q53494979Testing usability and trainability of indirect touch interaction: perspective for the next generation of air traffic control systems.
Q45065066The absence or temporal offset of visual feedback does not influence adaptation to novel movement dynamics
Q42747222The duration of reaching movement is longer than predicted by minimum variance
Q37086551The influence of visual perturbations on the neural control of limb stiffness.
Q88614664The quality of visual information about the lower extremities influences visuomotor coordination during virtual obstacle negotiation
Q30676845To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning
Q48043405Transfer of dynamic motor skills acquired during isometric training to free motion
Q57794227Visual feedback of hand and target location does not explain the tendency for straight adapted reaches
Q37578350Visuo-proprioceptive interactions during adaptation of the human reach.
Q36115956Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics
Q36223693When Optimal Feedback Control Is Not Enough: Feedforward Strategies Are Required for Optimal Control with Active Sensing

Search more.