scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | Julia I Smith | |
Kimberly Tanner | |||
P2860 | cites work | Points of view: content versus process: is this a fair choice? Undergraduate biology courses for nonscientists: toward a lived curriculum | Q24532139 |
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics | Q28756443 | ||
Points of View: Content versus Process: Is This a Fair Choice?: Undergraduate Biology Courses for Nonscientists: Toward a Lived Curriculum | Q29030157 | ||
Assessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology | Q35193318 | ||
A hierarchical biology concept framework: a tool for course design | Q35223865 | ||
Approaches to biology teaching and learning: from assays to assessments--on collecting evidence in science teaching | Q35223915 | ||
Putting the horse back in front of the cart: using visions and decisions about high-quality learning experiences to drive course design | Q35829997 | ||
Bioliteracy and teaching efficacy: what biologists can learn from physicists | Q35900884 | ||
Building, using, and maximizing the impact of concept inventories in the biological sciences: report on a National Science Foundation sponsored conference on the construction of concept inventories in the biological sciences. | Q36183674 | ||
Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates | Q36391781 | ||
Assessing student learning | Q39619891 | ||
Conceptual assessment in the biological sciences: a National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop. | Q51697968 | ||
The second Conceptual Assessment in the Biological Sciences workshop. | Q51886404 | ||
Points of view: content versus process: is this a fair choice? Can nonmajors courses lead to biological literacy? Do majors courses do any better? | Q95826149 | ||
What does the force concept inventory actually measure? | Q114738466 | ||
Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula | Q114738746 | ||
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 1-5 | |
P577 | publication date | 2010-01-01 | |
P1433 | published in | CBE: Life Sciences Education | Q5009071 |
P1476 | title | The problem of revealing how students think: Concept inventories and beyond | |
P478 | volume | 9 |
Q34098802 | 1, 2, 3, 4: infusing quantitative literacy into introductory biology |
Q37880704 | Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: curriculum development, part 2: becoming an agent of change |
Q92997613 | Can I Have Your Recipe? Using a Fidelity of Implementation (FOI) Framework to Identify the Key Ingredients of Formative Assessment for Learning |
Q50961455 | Development of a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience to Introduce Drug-Receptor Concepts. |
Q33663492 | Diagnostic of students' misconceptions using the Biological Concepts Instrument (BCI): A method for conducting an educational needs assessment |
Q90441019 | Error-Discovery Learning Boosts Student Engagement and Performance, while Reducing Student Attrition in a Bioinformatics Course |
Q35770963 | Examining the impact of question surface features on students' answers to constructed-response questions on photosynthesis |
Q41478014 | How can we improve problem solving in undergraduate biology? Applying lessons from 30 years of physics education research |
Q33763927 | Integrating Concepts in Biology Textbook Increases Learning: Assessment Triangulation Using Concept Inventory, Card Sorting, and MCAT Instruments, Followed by Longitudinal Tracking |
Q36623559 | Learning Outcomes with Linked Assessments - an Essential Part of our Regular Teaching Practice |
Q39531773 | Osmosis and diffusion conceptual assessment |
Q37147004 | Post-vision and change: do we know how to change? |
Q50682536 | Probing and improving student's understanding of protein α-helix structure using targeted assessment and classroom interventions in collaboration with a faculty community of practice. |
Q34122110 | Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: are we meeting the grade? |
Q92956417 | Small changes, big gains: A curriculum-wide study of teaching practices and student learning in undergraduate biology |
Q45881228 | Student-generated reading questions: diagnosing student thinking with diverse formative assessments |
Q37355693 | The EvoDevoCI: a concept inventory for gauging students' understanding of evolutionary developmental biology |
Q37462694 | The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types |
Q51846626 | The core principles ("big ideas") of physiology: results of faculty surveys. |
Q34372308 | The development of a conceptual framework and tools to assess undergraduates' principled use of models in cellular biology |
Q37613742 | The genetic drift inventory: a tool for measuring what advanced undergraduates have mastered about genetic drift |
Q35157641 | The molecular biology capstone assessment: a concept assessment for upper-division molecular biology students |
Q42062992 | Traditional Versus Online Biology Courses: Connecting Course Design and Student Learning in an Online Setting |
Q30528776 | Turning randomness into meaning at the molecular level using Muller's morphs |
Q37674389 | Using the Biology Card Sorting Task to Measure Changes in Conceptual Expertise during Postsecondary Biology Education |
Q35717748 | We must teach more effectively: here are four ways to get started |