| Q51283195 | A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. |
| Q33630770 | A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, double blind pilot-study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the non-absorbable Optilene Mesh Elastic versus the partly absorbable Ultrapro Mesh for incisional hernia repair |
| Q84974402 | Advantages of new materials in fascia transversalis reinforcement for inguinal hernia repair |
| Q80467446 | Bacteriological analysis of meshes removed for complications after surgical management of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse |
| Q37867981 | Basic science and clinical aspects of mesh infection in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery |
| Q37827732 | Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery |
| Q51290346 | Biomaterial-dependent MMP-2 expression in fibroblasts from patients with recurrent incisional hernias. |
| Q34472640 | Chronic pain after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized comparison of light and extralight titanized polypropylene mesh |
| Q46605052 | Comparative investigation of alloplastic materials for hernia repair with improved methodology |
| Q38852920 | Comparative study between Lichtenstein procedure and modified darn repair in treating primary inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
| Q47937130 | Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative period |
| Q51144468 | Comparison of biomaterials: three meshes and TAPP for inguinal hernia. |
| Q24616716 | Degradation, infection and heat effects on polypropylene mesh for pelvic implantation: what was known and when it was known |
| Q73036234 | Digest: |
| Q73960025 | Does every hernia demand a mesh repair? A critical review |
| Q77150478 | Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair |
| Q42671130 | Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair |
| Q42590816 | High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials |
| Q53215139 | Impact of endoscopic and histological evaluations of two different types of mesh plug for a groin hernia model. |
| Q51147707 | Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes. |
| Q34001531 | Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature |
| Q51081740 | In vivo evaluation of a new composite mesh (10% polypropylene/90% poly-L-lactic acid) for hernia repair. |
| Q51728685 | In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs. |
| Q51137317 | Incisional hernia: challenge of re-operations after mesh repair. |
| Q60376931 | Influence of a new self-gripping hernia mesh on male fertility in a rat model |
| Q34014796 | Inguinal hernia repair with the peduncled fascial flap: a new surgical technique |
| Q51302676 | Is there a risk of infertility after inguinal mesh repair? Experimental studies in the pig and the rabbit. |
| Q84357335 | Lightweight versus heavyweight in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis |
| Q41600673 | Mesh ingrowth with concomitant bacterial infection resulting in inability to explant: a failure of mesh salvage |
| Q50932690 | Mesh migration into the esophageal wall after mesh hiatoplasty: comparison of two alloplastic materials. |
| Q34501346 | Polyglactine/polypropylene mesh vs. propylene mesh: is there a need for newer prosthesis in inguinal hernia? |
| Q34714148 | Preparation of poly(L-lactic acid)-modified polypropylene mesh and its antiadhesion in experimental abdominal wall defect repair |
| Q33812667 | Remodeling characteristics and collagen distribution in biological scaffold materials explanted from human subjects after abdominal soft tissue reconstruction: an analysis of scaffold remodeling characteristics by patient risk factors and surgical s |
| Q33671241 | Remodeling characteristics and collagen distribution in synthetic mesh materials explanted from human subjects after abdominal wall reconstruction: an analysis of remodeling characteristics by patient risk factors and surgical site classifications |
| Q89286829 | Self-fixing parietex progrip versus the standard sutured prolene mesh in tension-free repair of inguinal hernia: effect on testicular volume and testicular blood flow |
| Q39990826 | Shrinkage evaluation of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene meshes in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial |
| Q47785385 | Sixty-month follow-up after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three types of mesh: a prospective randomized trial |
| Q44486692 | Sutureless Lichtenstein: first results of a prospective randomised clinical trial |
| Q83888423 | The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair |
| Q51133682 | The new 4DDome prosthesis: an original light and partially absorbable composite mesh for hernia repair. |
| Q50944006 | Three-dimensional analysis of implanted magnetic-resonance-visible meshes. |
| Q51570826 | Titanium coating of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair: effect on biocompatibilty. |
| Q51401248 | Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with titanium-coated lightweight polypropylene mesh: early results. |
| Q43711795 | [Guidelines for the surgical treatment of female urinary stress incontinence in women using the suburethral sling]. |
| Q81767815 | [In-vitro study of the cellular response of human fibroblasts cultured on alloplastic hernia meshes. Influence of mesh material and structure] |
| Q83994984 | [Inguinal and femoral hernia repair] |