Sixty-month follow-up after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three types of mesh: a prospective randomized trial

scientific article published on 9 April 2008

Sixty-month follow-up after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three types of mesh: a prospective randomized trial is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S00464-008-9863-6
P698PubMed publication ID18398650
P5875ResearchGate publication ID5453362

P2093author name stringBurkhard Ubrig
Hubert Zirngibl
Johannes Schmidt
Mike Ralf Langenbach
P2860cites workLaparoscopic hernia repair -- the facts, but no fashionQ33705686
Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humansQ33889090
Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literatureQ34001531
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.Q36036744
Early results for new lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repairQ36503378
Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional herniaQ42662914
Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsQ42671670
Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative periodQ47937130
Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes.Q51147707
Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias.Q51375231
Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.Q51570797
In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.Q51728685
Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia.Q52116475
[Risks and benefits of laparoscopic hernia-plasty (TAPP). 5 years experiences with 3,400 hernia repairs]Q52183061
Integration of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall: process of scar formation and macrophage responseQ72030614
The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogsQ74374712
Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repairQ77150478
Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin herniaQ78402331
Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological responseQ79950646
P433issue8
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)1790-1797
P577publication date2008-04-09
P1433published inSurgical EndoscopyQ7646203
P1476titleSixty-month follow-up after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three types of mesh: a prospective randomized trial
P478volume22

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38238915A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair
Q39612117A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing chronic groin pain and quality of life in lightweight versus heavyweight polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Q37827732Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery
Q57167497Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Q41960631Comparing Early Outcomes using Non Absorbable Polypropylene Mesh and Partially Absorbable Composite Mesh through Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia
Q52892465Comparison of a lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® LP) and a large-pore knitted PTFE mesh (GORE® INFINIT® mesh)--Biocompatibility in a standardized endoscopic extraperitoneal hernia model.
Q38802515Convalescence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a qualitative systematic review
Q47183398Cost-utility analysis comparing heavy-weight and light-weight mesh in laparoscopic surgery for unilateral inguinal hernias
Q50942994Design Strategies and Applications of Biomaterials and Devices for Hernia Repair.
Q34248961Development of novel electrospun absorbable polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for hernia repair applications
Q84231025Do we follow evidence-based medicine recommendations during inguinal hernia surgery? Results of a survey covering 2441 hernia repairs in 2007
Q38109515EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias
Q37977143Early pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A qualitative systematic review
Q43976439Health-related quality of life after TAPP repair for the sportsmen's groin
Q51454452Impact of pressure and gas type on adhesion formation and biomaterial integration in laparoscopy.
Q37598069Lightweight mesh improves functional outcome in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair
Q84357335Lightweight versus heavyweight in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis
Q37981939Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis
Q54877788Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients.
Q37760622Which mesh for hernia repair?