scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Paul Stuart Appelbaum | Q7153848 |
Laura J. Damschroder | Q47504437 | ||
Elizabeth Beattie | Q56515463 | ||
David S Knopman | Q63967707 | ||
Scott Y H Kim | Q90785152 | ||
P2093 | author name string | H Myra Kim | |
Rebecca A Uhlmann | |||
Raymond De Vries | |||
Laura Struble | |||
P2860 | cites work | Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study | Q24603249 |
Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) | Q24671756 | ||
Subacute meningoencephalitis in a subset of patients with AD after Abeta42 immunization | Q28185520 | ||
Alzheimer disease: current concepts and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies | Q34180806 | ||
Proxy and surrogate consent in geriatric neuropsychiatric research: update and recommendations | Q35762172 | ||
Is psychiatric research stigmatized? An experimental survey of the public | Q36271467 | ||
Older adults' attitudes toward enrollment of non-competent subjects participating in Alzheimer's research | Q37082761 | ||
Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans | Q37145557 | ||
Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate | Q37354492 | ||
Eligibility of Alzheimer's disease clinic patients for clinical trials | Q40886187 | ||
A phase 1 clinical trial of nerve growth factor gene therapy for Alzheimer disease | Q45883058 | ||
Proxy consent to research: the legal landscape | Q46451499 | ||
What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research? | Q50121906 | ||
Medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment. | Q51898496 | ||
Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical resesarch--Maryland's policy initiative. | Q51935113 | ||
Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary. | Q51942206 | ||
Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer's disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. | Q51967278 | ||
Deliberating about Bioethics | Q53597498 | ||
Patients, privacy and trust: Patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records | Q59690569 | ||
Views of potential subjects toward proposed regulations for clinical research with adults unable to consent | Q77851730 | ||
P433 | issue | 4 | |
P921 | main subject | dementia | Q83030 |
informed consent | Q764527 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 342-350 | |
P577 | publication date | 2010-02-26 | |
P1433 | published in | Alzheimer's and Dementia | Q15750965 |
P1476 | title | Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research | |
P478 | volume | 6 |
Q36848494 | Acceptable Approaches to Enrolling Adults Who Cannot Consent in More Than Minimal Risk Research |
Q33786044 | Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies |
Q33838431 | Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research |
Q38439734 | Comfort with proxy consent to research involving decisionally impaired older adults: do type of proxy and risk-benefit profile matter? |
Q91605437 | Comparing the attitudes of four groups of stakeholders from Quebec, Canada, toward extending medical aid in dying to incompetent patients with dementia |
Q31007557 | Computer modeling with randomized-controlled trial data informs the development of person-centered aged care homes |
Q38857009 | Deliberative Engagement Methods for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research |
Q47751446 | Dementia and representative democracy: Exploring challenges and implications for democratic citizenship |
Q58150320 | Does promoting research advance planning in a general elderly population enhance completion of a research directive and proxies' predictive ability? a randomized controlled trial |
Q90436218 | Effect of Public Deliberation on Patient Attitudes Regarding Consent and Data Use in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology |
Q35606210 | Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research |
Q94481889 | Eliciting patient views on the allocation of limited healthcare resources: a deliberation on hepatitis C treatment in the Veterans Health Administration |
Q36473380 | Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects |
Q28485900 | How important is 'accuracy' of surrogate decision-making for research participation? |
Q41428317 | Impact of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate to biobanks: an experimental survey |
Q35977251 | Public's approach to surrogate consent for dementia research: cautious pragmatism |
Q57554355 | Publicʼs Approach to Surrogate Consent for Dementia Research |
Q35170180 | Research involving subjects with Alzheimer's disease in Italy: the possible role of family members |
Q36330685 | The ethics of informed consent in Alzheimer disease research |
Search more.