Deliberating about Bioethics

scientific article published on May 1, 1997

Deliberating about Bioethics is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.2307/3528667
P888JSTOR article ID3528667
P698PubMed publication ID9219023

P2093author name stringD. Thompson
A. Gutmann
P433issue3
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectdecision makingQ1331926
bioethicsQ194294
P304page(s)38-41
P577publication date1997-05-01
P1433published inHastings Center ReportQ5680291
P1476titleDeliberating about Bioethics
P478volume27

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38638819A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics
Q35912049A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethics
Q61797876Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy
Q33786044Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies
Q37340374Cross-border research on human embryonic stem cells: legal and ethical considerations
Q59690572Deliberative Procedures in Bioethics
Q33927499Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research
Q54730039Democracy and genetic privacy: the value of bodily integrity.
Q90436218Effect of Public Deliberation on Patient Attitudes Regarding Consent and Data Use in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology
Q35606210Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research
Q53118213Emerging technologies and developing countries: stem cell research regulation and Argentina.
Q47643092Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics
Q48649512Ethics instruction in an issues-oriented course on public health genetics
Q30350217Evidence-based ethics for neurology and psychiatry research.
Q42430542Expert and Advocacy Group Consensus Findings on the Horizon of Public Health Genetic Testing
Q36118092Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials
Q36472757Integrating Public Health and Deliberative Public Bioethics: Lessons from the Human Genome Project Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program
Q35299322Integrating ethics for the nation's health
Q57170955Laying Anchor: Inserting Precision Health into a Public Health Genetics Policy Course
Q36769283Laypersons' choices and deliberations for mental health coverage
Q37030945Looking ahead: addressing ethical challenges in public health practice
Q34160494Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support
Q35558835Protection at the cutting edge: the case for central review of human gene transfer research
Q35761254Public attitudes and values in priority setting
Q33765590Public bioethics and research involving persons with mental disorders
Q35052740Race and healthcare disparities: overcoming vulnerablity
Q36273298Setting the agenda for urban bioethics
Q37145557Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans
Q46907171The Quality of Death: Euthanasia in Australia
Q46107809Three ways to politicize bioethics
Q79333353Time to drop the language of 'consensus'
Q47673081Toward critical bioethics
Q56909629Toward increased public representation on bioethics committees: lessons from judging the Cold War human radiation experiments
Q37094978Who cares about health inequalities? Cross-country evidence from the World Health Survey
Q36819866Why and when should we use public deliberation?