scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | D. Thompson | |
A. Gutmann | |||
P433 | issue | 3 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | decision making | Q1331926 |
bioethics | Q194294 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 38-41 | |
P577 | publication date | 1997-05-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Hastings Center Report | Q5680291 |
P1476 | title | Deliberating about Bioethics | |
P478 | volume | 27 |
Q38638819 | A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics |
Q35912049 | A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethics |
Q61797876 | Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy |
Q33786044 | Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies |
Q37340374 | Cross-border research on human embryonic stem cells: legal and ethical considerations |
Q59690572 | Deliberative Procedures in Bioethics |
Q33927499 | Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research |
Q54730039 | Democracy and genetic privacy: the value of bodily integrity. |
Q90436218 | Effect of Public Deliberation on Patient Attitudes Regarding Consent and Data Use in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology |
Q35606210 | Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research |
Q53118213 | Emerging technologies and developing countries: stem cell research regulation and Argentina. |
Q47643092 | Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics |
Q48649512 | Ethics instruction in an issues-oriented course on public health genetics |
Q30350217 | Evidence-based ethics for neurology and psychiatry research. |
Q42430542 | Expert and Advocacy Group Consensus Findings on the Horizon of Public Health Genetic Testing |
Q36118092 | Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials |
Q36472757 | Integrating Public Health and Deliberative Public Bioethics: Lessons from the Human Genome Project Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program |
Q35299322 | Integrating ethics for the nation's health |
Q57170955 | Laying Anchor: Inserting Precision Health into a Public Health Genetics Policy Course |
Q36769283 | Laypersons' choices and deliberations for mental health coverage |
Q37030945 | Looking ahead: addressing ethical challenges in public health practice |
Q34160494 | Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support |
Q35558835 | Protection at the cutting edge: the case for central review of human gene transfer research |
Q35761254 | Public attitudes and values in priority setting |
Q33765590 | Public bioethics and research involving persons with mental disorders |
Q35052740 | Race and healthcare disparities: overcoming vulnerablity |
Q36273298 | Setting the agenda for urban bioethics |
Q37145557 | Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans |
Q46907171 | The Quality of Death: Euthanasia in Australia |
Q46107809 | Three ways to politicize bioethics |
Q79333353 | Time to drop the language of 'consensus' |
Q47673081 | Toward critical bioethics |
Q56909629 | Toward increased public representation on bioethics committees: lessons from judging the Cold War human radiation experiments |
Q37094978 | Who cares about health inequalities? Cross-country evidence from the World Health Survey |
Q36819866 | Why and when should we use public deliberation? |