| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Isabelle Boutron | Q20090328 |
| Philippe Ravaud | Q37368509 | ||
| Douglas G. Altman | Q5300242 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Susan Dutton | |
| P433 | issue | 20 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | statistics | Q12483 |
| P304 | page(s) | 2058-2064 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2010-05-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | The Journal of the American Medical Association | Q1470970 |
| P1476 | title | Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes | |
| P478 | volume | 303 |
| Q37320622 | "Spin" in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes |
| Q92562270 | 'Not clinically effective but cost-effective' - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with 'doubly null' results: a cross-sectional study |
| Q41368858 | 'Spin' in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review |
| Q40543080 | 'Spin' in reports of clinical research |
| Q40068394 | A 5-year randomized trial on the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: a critical appraisal. |
| Q50127722 | A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Spin in Randomized Controlled Trials |
| Q37025880 | A Perspective on the Principles of Integrity in Infectious Disease Research |
| Q38227877 | A clinician's guide to the assessment and interpretation of noninferiority trials for novel therapies |
| Q50058353 | A low proportion of systematic reviews in physical therapy are registered: a survey of 150 published systematic reviews. |
| Q24594196 | A meta-review of evidence on heart failure disease management programs: the challenges of describing and synthesizing evidence on complex interventions |
| Q42376867 | A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials |
| Q33721201 | A review of spin and bias use in the early intervention in psychosis literature. |
| Q47107090 | A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research |
| Q83787698 | A skeptic's guide to guidelines |
| Q24273251 | A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) |
| Q58759493 | A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management |
| Q30413920 | Achieving sufficient accrual to address the primary endpoint in phase III clinical trials from U.S. Cooperative Oncology Groups |
| Q38366420 | Addressing conflict of interest in non-pharmacological research |
| Q37046876 | Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials. |
| Q89898513 | Analysis of conference abstracts of prosthodontic randomised-controlled trials presented at IADR general sessions (2002-2015): a cross-sectional study of the relationship between demographic characteristics, reporting quality and final publication |
| Q38168840 | Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers (ARBs) in Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trials |
| Q34151632 | Are Cardiovascular Benefits in Statin Lipid Effects Dependent on Baseline Lipid Levels? |
| Q36313795 | Are potentially clinically meaningful benefits misinterpreted in cardiovascular randomized trials? A systematic examination of statistical significance, clinical significance, and authors' conclusions. |
| Q36673516 | Assessing the Eventual Publication of Clinical Trial Abstracts Submitted to a Large Annual Oncology Meeting |
| Q33756337 | Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment |
| Q64881800 | Association of industry ties with outcomes of studies examining the effect of wholegrain foods on cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Q38647708 | Balneotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis-a systematic review |
| Q30551107 | Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence |
| Q37638675 | Benefits and harms of statin therapy for persons with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q47890495 | Beyond the printed page: Leveraging social media to extend the Journal's influence |
| Q44617042 | Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer |
| Q90641595 | CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials |
| Q54940079 | Causal interpretation of correlational studies - Analysis of medical news on the website of the official journal for German physicians. |
| Q55410258 | Causal language and strength of inference in academic and media articles shared in social media (CLAIMS): A systematic review. |
| Q38228729 | Celebrating 20 years of evidence from the Cochrane Collaboration: what has been the impact of systematic reviews on nephrology? |
| Q50946911 | Cervical Lateral Glide Neural Mobilization Is Effective in Treating Cervicobrachial Pain: A Randomized Waiting List Controlled Clinical Trial. |
| Q91657238 | Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis |
| Q89165227 | Checklist for the preparation and review of pain clinical trial publications: a pain-specific supplement to CONSORT |
| Q39497742 | Citation bias and selective focus on positive findings in the literature on the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR), life stress and depression. |
| Q35805116 | Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention |
| Q40691528 | Clinical trials: subgroup analyses in randomized trials--more rigour needed |
| Q35079891 | Commentary on: Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News coverage: A Cohort Study |
| Q36755588 | Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research. |
| Q42590521 | Communication of randomized controlled trial results must match the study focus |
| Q38267237 | Comparing alternative design options for chronic disease prevention interventions. |
| Q30650564 | Comparing data accuracy between structured abstracts and full-text journal articles: implications in their use for informing clinical decisions |
| Q35777357 | Comparisons against baseline within randomised groups are often used and can be highly misleading |
| Q38256058 | Composite scores in comparative effectiveness research: counterbalancing parsimony and dimensionality in patient-reported outcomes |
| Q34560163 | Conflicts of interest and critiques of the use of systematic reviews in policymaking: an analysis of opinion articles |
| Q28475928 | Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study |
| Q37967678 | Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review |
| Q83598970 | Dangerous Spin Doctors: Seven Steps to Protect Yourself from Deception in Medical Research |
| Q42544317 | Declaration of transparency for each research article |
| Q34713094 | Deficient reporting and interpretation of non-inferiority randomized clinical trials in HIV patients: a systematic review. |
| Q39674024 | Developing more open and equitable relationships with industry to improve advancements in clinical research in dermatology |
| Q37940446 | Disclosure of clinical trial results when product development is abandoned. |
| Q45735520 | Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months |
| Q84971083 | Distorting, Misrepresenting and Slanting Research Results |
| Q34594499 | Does cultural competency training of health professionals improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and proposed algorithm for future research |
| Q89536514 | Effect of Funding Source on "Spin" in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole |
| Q55692307 | Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial. |
| Q48362101 | Effects of Median Nerve Neural Mobilization in Treating Cervicobrachial Pain: A Randomized Waiting List-Controlled Clinical Trial. |
| Q41689124 | Efficacy, effectiveness, and behavior change trials in exercise research |
| Q53274543 | Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions |
| Q26995587 | Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials |
| Q36059680 | Evidence of Physiotherapy Interventions for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials |
| Q41544855 | Evidence of spin in clinical trials in the surgical literature |
| Q26785694 | Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration |
| Q53472583 | Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration |
| Q30577024 | External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting |
| Q50143132 | Family nurse practitioner student perception of journal abstract usefulness in clinical decision making: a randomized controlled trial |
| Q64122716 | Financial conflicts of interest in clinical research |
| Q37524877 | Fire in the ashes: can failed Alzheimer's disease drugs succeed with second chances? |
| Q99622887 | Flexibilization of Science, Cognitive Biases, and the COVID-19 Pandemic |
| Q35783334 | Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature |
| Q28607856 | Goals in Nutrition Science 2015-2020 |
| Q24194514 | HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis |
| Q30530779 | How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P |
| Q30932208 | How to get all trials reported: audit, better data, and individual accountability |
| Q24201303 | Human recombinant activated factor VII for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver diseases |
| Q89662021 | Identification and evaluation of risk of generalizability biases in pilot versus efficacy/effectiveness trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q37826452 | Identifying spin in health management evaluations |
| Q90542191 | Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| Q34586642 | Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers' interpretation: a randomized controlled trial |
| Q30249679 | Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q33829090 | Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study |
| Q27498844 | Implementation of a publication strategy in the context of reporting biases. A case study based on new documents from Neurontin® litigation |
| Q53122188 | Inaugural Editorial: Making the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology Your "Home Journal". |
| Q35109418 | Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study. |
| Q64113773 | Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research |
| Q91955182 | Indication of Measures of Uncertainty for Statistical Significance in Abstracts of Published Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| Q48540562 | Industry funded clinical trials: bias and quality |
| Q24202591 | Industry sponsorship and research outcome |
| Q64122695 | Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis |
| Q38974514 | Industry sponsorship in trials on fluoride varnish or gels for caries prevention. |
| Q47879395 | Influence of author's affiliation and funding sources on the results of cohort studies on occupational cancer. |
| Q47141975 | Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial |
| Q47560836 | Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials |
| Q35810253 | Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News |
| Q47134451 | Interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin: protocol for a prospective meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials |
| Q51737520 | Is pharmacologic treatment better than neural mobilization for cervicobrachial pain? A randomized clinical trial. |
| Q44498343 | Less than the truth |
| Q40585344 | Letter to the Editor: Moving science forward by increasing awareness of reporting and citation biases: a reply to Vrshek-Schallhorn et al. (2016). |
| Q64241961 | Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes: A Systematic Review |
| Q37527193 | Lost in Translation: Neuropsychiatric Drug Development |
| Q42317700 | Marketing trials, marketing tricks - how to spot them and how to stop them |
| Q86788184 | Medical SPIN: misinformation by another name |
| Q38654420 | Mindfulness-based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
| Q52659640 | Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature |
| Q21144605 | Misrepresentation of randomized controlled trials in press releases and news coverage: a cohort study |
| Q38168642 | Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review |
| Q60679520 | Neural tissue management provides immediate clinically relevant benefits without harmful effects for patients with nerve-related neck and arm pain: a randomised trial |
| Q41209498 | No survival benefit for patients with melanoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy: critical appraisal of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-I final report. |
| Q28538894 | Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis |
| Q64953535 | Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlan |
| Q50194740 | On bias in medical research; reflections on present salt-cholesterol controversies |
| Q82694121 | On “Adherence to clinical practice guidelines…” Rutten GM, Degen S, Hendriks EJ, et al. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1111–1122 |
| Q47228203 | Open season: positive changes for increased transparency in the biomedical literature |
| Q26834199 | OpenTrials: towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials |
| Q28598096 | Outcome Reporting Bias in Government-Sponsored Policy Evaluations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of 13 Studies |
| Q38859085 | Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification. |
| Q57790342 | Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review |
| Q41140653 | Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A meta-epidemiological investigation. |
| Q40786585 | Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation |
| Q26783905 | Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study |
| Q35608208 | Pharmaceutical sponsorship bias influences thrombolytic literature in acute ischemic stroke |
| Q61809801 | Physician characteristics associated with proper assessment of overstated conclusions in research abstracts: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
| Q58778832 | Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice |
| Q24289045 | Practices and impact of primary outcome adjustment in randomized controlled trials: meta-epidemiologic study |
| Q33845330 | Press releases issued by supplements industry organisations and non-industry organisations in response to publication of clinical research findings: a case-control study. |
| Q53211921 | Prevalence and predictors of bias in the reporting of primary efficacy and toxicity endpoints in randomized clinical trials of radiation oncology. |
| Q35734501 | Principles for the ethical analysis of clinical and translational research |
| Q37037142 | Professional Conferences, Unprofessional Conduct |
| Q64091965 | Prognostic models for breast cancer: a systematic review |
| Q46298320 | Promoting transparent and accurate reporting of research studies in rheumatology: Endorsement of reporting guidelines in rheumatology journals |
| Q24187816 | Prophylactic lidocaine for myocardial infarction |
| Q38108574 | Publication Bias, with a Focus on Psychiatry: Causes and Solutions |
| Q36819100 | Publication and non-publication of drug trial results: a 10-year cohort of trials in Norwegian general practice |
| Q27323022 | Publication bias in laboratory animal research: a survey on magnitude, drivers, consequences and potential solutions |
| Q43836938 | Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature: shifting the focus from the "positive" to the "truth". |
| Q38112559 | Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 2010 |
| Q38818570 | Questionable science and reproducibility in electrical brain stimulation research. |
| Q28608258 | Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles-a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q33552860 | Racial discrimination and the black-white gap in adverse birth outcomes: a review |
| Q37558947 | Randomised controlled trials and population-based observational research: partners in the evolution of medical evidence |
| Q26784106 | Randomised trials in context: practical problems and social aspects of evidence-based medicine and policy |
| Q34110332 | Randomized Controlled Trials of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment in Africa: Results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register |
| Q53081707 | Randomized controlled studies: scientific evidence or disinformation? |
| Q52900684 | Re: “On the More Insidious Manifestations of Bias in Scientific Reporting” |
| Q35002175 | Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source |
| Q38177450 | Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research |
| Q57800224 | Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study |
| Q34047368 | Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews |
| Q92923298 | Reporting Quality of Journal Abstracts for Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials Before and After the Implementation of the CONSORT Extension for Abstracts |
| Q90047737 | Reporting gaps between news media and scientific papers on outdoor air pollution-related health outcomes: A content analysis |
| Q35983635 | Reporting of Positive Results in Randomized Controlled Trials of Mindfulness-Based Mental Health Interventions |
| Q48252366 | Reporting of heterogeneity of treatment effect in cohort studies: a review of the literature |
| Q92016026 | Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes |
| Q49109352 | Retractions due to errors and frauds |
| Q46988142 | Rhetorical Strategies Used in the Reporting of Implantable Defibrillator Primary Prevention Trials |
| Q30278455 | STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies |
| Q57148875 | Scientific inbreeding and same-team replication: Type D personality as an example |
| Q51428058 | Scientific rigour in psycho-oncology trials: why and how to avoid common statistical errors |
| Q44842755 | Should comparative effectiveness research ignore industry-funded data? |
| Q37728379 | Spin in RCTs of anxiety medication with a positive primary outcome: a comparison of concerns expressed by the US FDA and in the published literature |
| Q92342801 | Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews |
| Q58501084 | Spin kills science |
| Q92396680 | Spin of results in scientific articles might kill you |
| Q44087997 | Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: A Roadmap about Good Clinical Practice and Patient Care. |
| Q34935840 | Study design and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of chronic idiopathic or autoimmune urticaria: review |
| Q86965906 | Surrogacy of Financial Conflicts of Interest |
| Q37117584 | The Drug Facts Box: Improving the communication of prescription drug information |
| Q38908683 | The association of funding source on effect size in randomized controlled trials: 2013-2015 - a cross-sectional survey and meta-analysis |
| Q58802592 | The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: the case of depression |
| Q37858846 | The influence of study characteristics on reporting of subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: systematic review |
| Q47134432 | The limited application of stem cells in medicine: a review |
| Q35682383 | The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors |
| Q30620046 | The natural history of conducting and reporting clinical trials: interviews with trialists |
| Q52562524 | The over-representation of significant p values in abstracts compared to corresponding full texts: A systematic review of surgical randomized trials |
| Q38248538 | The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review |
| Q92497275 | Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of "spin" in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients'/caregivers' interpretation of treatment benefit |
| Q64055683 | Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review |
| Q38126350 | Transparent Reporting of Trials Is Essential |
| Q24235994 | Treatment for anemia in people with AIDS |
| Q56880236 | Trial Reports: Improving Reporting, Minimizing Bias, and Producing Better Evidence-Based Practice |
| Q90458774 | Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture |
| Q49959095 | Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process |
| Q40990512 | Use of a Spin Strategy Can Result in Unreliable Research Findings |
| Q21775202 | Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis |
| Q61625014 | What heart failure programme works best? Wrong question, wrong assumptions |
| Q42769613 | What's new in dermatological treatments? |
| Q42316662 | Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients |
| Q91704787 | Why patients receive treatments that are minimally effective? |
| Q38128905 | mobilityRERC State of the Science Conference: considerations for developing an evidence base for wheeled mobility and seating service delivery |
Search more.