| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Sam Adie | |
| Ian A Harris | |||
| Jason Tang | |||
| Yusuf Assem | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Inconsistencies between abstracts and manuscripts in published studies about lumbar spine surgery | Q38192421 |
| Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trials | Q38414496 | ||
| Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross sectional study | Q42122297 | ||
| Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals | Q50147918 | ||
| What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? | Q52925799 | ||
| If the results of an article are noteworthy, read the entire article; do not rely on the abstract alone | Q53430906 | ||
| It's time to rehabilitate the P-value | Q73836793 | ||
| Low P-values or narrow confidence intervals: which are more durable? | Q73836796 | ||
| Discordance between conclusions stated in the abstract and conclusions in the article: analysis of published randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy in lung cancer | Q84253795 | ||
| Why most published research findings are false | Q21092395 | ||
| Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses | Q27860655 | ||
| Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature | Q28654703 | ||
| Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles | Q29618882 | ||
| The distribution of probability values in medical abstracts: an observational study | Q30488589 | ||
| Comparing data accuracy between structured abstracts and full-text journal articles: implications in their use for informing clinical decisions | Q30650564 | ||
| Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes | Q34117393 | ||
| Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors | Q34389549 | ||
| Impact of spin in the abstracts of articles reporting results of randomized controlled trials in the field of cancer: the SPIIN randomized controlled trial | Q34448221 | ||
| Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. | Q34510811 | ||
| A comparison of the accuracy of clinical decisions based on full-text articles and on journal abstracts alone: a study among residents in a tertiary care hospital | Q36712992 | ||
| "Spin" in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes | Q37320622 | ||
| P921 | main subject | p-value | Q253255 |
| P304 | page(s) | 194-199 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2017-07-28 | |
| P1433 | published in | Contemporary clinical trials communications | Q27726968 |
| P1476 | title | The over-representation of significant p values in abstracts compared to corresponding full texts: A systematic review of surgical randomized trials | |
| P478 | volume | 7 |
Search more.