Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

scientific article

Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJ.38356.424606.8F
P932PMC publication ID555875
P698PubMed publication ID15681569

P50authorDouglas G. AltmanQ5300242
P2093author name stringAn-Wen Chan
P2860cites workThe CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsQ28185637
Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchQ28285027
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articlesQ29618882
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issuesQ29620304
Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statementQ33983100
Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMedQ34577274
Registration of trials and protocolsQ35548815
Bias in meta-analytic researchQ43559593
Problems in the design and reporting of trials of antifungal agents encountered during meta-analysisQ50141599
Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methodsQ52141807
False-positive results in clinical trials: multiple significance tests and the problem of unreported comparisonsQ52310305
Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committeeQ52941855
Role of the pharmaceutical industry in major clinical trialsQ69909359
Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of facultyQ73224477
The adequacy of reporting randomized, controlled trials in the evaluation of antidepressantsQ77735182
How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishingQ78171131
Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journalsQ81584040
P433issue7494
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectPubMedQ180686
biasQ742736
P304page(s)753
P577publication date2005-01-28
P1433published inThe BMJQ546003
P1476titleIdentifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
P478volume330

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q30552717"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study
Q90179312A comparative study to evaluate quality of data documentation between investigator-initiated and pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies
Q56897213A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
Q38287843A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials
Q92515344A protocol developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for infertility
Q53113773A reader responds to "The myth of equipoise in phase 1 clinical trials".
Q51024831A selection model for accounting for publication bias in a full network meta-analysis
Q92219370A systematic review and meta-analysis of memantine for the prevention or treatment of chronic pain
Q34438661A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions promoting effective condom use.
Q64948250A systematic review of specialist inpatient dementia care services versus standard inpatient dementia care in acute hospitals.
Q28472665A systematic review of studies that aim to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials in children
Q43160307Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm
Q33378465African HIV/AIDS trials are more likely to report adequate allocation concealment and random generation than North American trials
Q39305054Age-Related Patterns in Cancer Pain and Its Psychosocial Impact: Investigating the Role of Variability in Physical and Mental Health Quality of Life
Q37863701Allergens responsible for allergic contact dermatitis among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Q24234305Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission
Q24235952Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission
Q34939554Analgesic efficacy of opioids in chronic pain: recent meta-analyses
Q24240612Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers
Q24242699Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers
Q24235796Antioxidant supplements for liver diseases
Q24242191Antioxidant supplements for preventing gastrointestinal cancers
Q24245704Antioxidant supplements for preventing gastrointestinal cancers
Q37730441Are outcomes reported in surgical randomized trials patient-important? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Q30485022Assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in the field of dentistry indexed in the Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde) database
Q42379732Assessment of risk of bias in quasi-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials reported in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology between 2010 and 2016.
Q24289437Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations
Q89497003Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials-ESORT)
Q24288921Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs
Q24288823Attenti alle bufale ("beware of red herrings"), or, how to make evidence-based medicine work for you
Q55475456Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials.
Q42122297Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross sectional study
Q36416843Bench to bedside: the quest for quality in experimental stroke research
Q38623830Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q24244930Benzodiazepines for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia
Q24193207Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
Q24198908Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
Q92969057Bias in clinical trials into the effects of complementary and alternative medicine therapies on hemodialysis patients
Q38133728Biologic agents in rheumatology: unmet issues after 200 trials and $200 billion sales
Q26796256Biomarkers of Inflammation and Immune Function and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Q33316156CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration
Q37117080Calibration of credibility of agnostic genome-wide associations
Q93188078Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework
Q38663710Change in physical activity from adolescence to early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.
Q94545005Chinese Taoist Cognitive Therapy for Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety in Adults in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Q35805116Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention
Q46584339Clinical trial registration at Tobacco Control.
Q86499109Clinical trials submitted to the JID: place your bet and show us your hand
Q24188088Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
Q24202314Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
Q24235035Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials
Q26783379Complementary and Alternative Medicine for the Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Q24194968Complementary therapies for chronic plaque psoriasis
Q38150483Consistency and completeness of reported outcomes in randomized trials of primary immunosuppression in kidney transplantation
Q37967678Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review
Q37980890Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full-text journal articles.
Q46170421Core outcome measures in perioperative and anaesthetic care.
Q47158367Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer
Q30650486Data collection in cancer clinical trials: Too much of a good thing?
Q37332662Demands for 'off-licence' access to trastuzumab (Herceptin): content analysis of UK newspaper articles
Q48105455Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature
Q36498619Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
Q37279152Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery.
Q33375845Diabetes experts' reasoning about diabetes prevention studies: a questionnaire survey
Q35774634Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews
Q55025094Do patients with reduced or excellent performance status derive the same clinical benefit from novel systemic cancer therapies? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Q28475991Doctors and Drug Companies: Still Cozy after All These Years
Q36635523Economic evaluations in the canadian common drug review
Q53078875Editorial bias in scientific publications
Q92237045Effects of cannabinoid administration for pain: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
Q34656488Efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran in the treatment of major depression in comparison with other antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Q36125353Efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Q30357430Emotion felt by the listener and expressed by the music: literature review and theoretical perspectives.
Q35060093Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications
Q94546137Ensuring young voices are heard in core outcome set development: international workshops with 70 children and young people
Q33521365Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.
Q33751652Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review
Q24288780Evolution and translation of research findings: from bench to where?
Q36584276Exercise and Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Q30920608Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies
Q21563421Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others
Q42940771Financial ties that might bind: Delve deeper to find the links
Q33787792Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists
Q53184205Full disclosure--nothing less will do.
Q57338290GRADE-Leitlinien: 4. Bewertung der Qualität der Evidenz – Studienlimitationen (Risiko für Bias)
Q37454595Gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Q34163883Global Distribution of Outbreaks of Water-Associated Infectious Diseases
Q40284634Grading evidence and recommendations for clinical practice guidelines in nephrology. A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).
Q46108878Guarding Against Overtesting, Overdiagnosis, and Overtreatment of Older Adults: Thinking Beyond Imaging and Injuries to Weigh Harms and Benefits
Q64247117Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol
Q36498818Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
Q24241852Hepatitis B immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis B or with unknown exposure status
Q35943880How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
Q35211265How electronic clinical data can improve health technology assessment
Q53750741How to design a randomised controlled trial
Q35151458Impact of inclusion of industry trial results registries as an information source for systematic reviews
Q64060254Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT)
Q58054154Improving the Reporting of Health and Psychological Research
Q28474828Inadequate dissemination of phase I trials: a retrospective cohort study
Q24240883Increased police patrols for preventing alcohol-impaired driving
Q28611347Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
Q35158628Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis
Q37572176Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses
Q35810253Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News
Q37329334Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis
Q26738749Interventions for compassionate nursing care: A systematic review
Q38520309Issues relating to selective reporting when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions
Q33588182Legislation for trial registration and data transparency
Q28069582Local anesthetic injections with or without steroid for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q37027983MOMENT--Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
Q35811280Mail merge can be used to create personalized questionnaires in complex surveys
Q49843236Management of medial humeral epicondyle fractures in children: a structured review protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
Q38973072Management of non-syndromic dens evaginatus affecting permanent maxillary central incisors: a systematic review
Q38866484Management of non-syndromic double tooth affecting permanent maxillary central incisors: a systematic review.
Q54942333Many Flavors of Model-Based Meta-Analysis: Part II - Modeling Summary Level Longitudinal Responses.
Q57318061Medical editors and trial reporting: a betrayal of patient care
Q53278031Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust
Q38031911Meta‐analysis in context
Q37008455Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls
Q24240125Milnacipran versus other antidepressive agents for depression
Q37765079Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
Q24597537Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study
Q28538894Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis
Q33758588Obstacles to researching the researchers: a case study of the ethical challenges of undertaking methodological research investigating the reporting of randomised controlled trials
Q93129503Opportunities for selective reporting of harms in randomized clinical trials: Selection criteria for non-systematic adverse events
Q24289273Outcome Reporting Among Drug Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
Q28598096Outcome Reporting Bias in Government-Sponsored Policy Evaluations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of 13 Studies
Q52714553Outcome pre-specification requires sufficient detail to guard against outcome switching in clinical trials: a case study
Q42257138Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs
Q97527212Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review
Q36296533Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
Q35347819Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability.
Q35994171Outcomes of Parathyroidectomy in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Q42374395Patient safety requires a new way to publish clinical trials
Q64928193Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
Q37513556Peginterferon plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients with human immunodeficiency virus
Q24632541Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review
Q36000225Planning and reporting of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer trials.
Q24246026Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients
Q38668319Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients
Q36300403Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia
Q24289045Practices and impact of primary outcome adjustment in randomized controlled trials: meta-epidemiologic study
Q28654786Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey
Q36104338Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1).
Q30528845Prospective registration and outcome-reporting bias in randomized controlled trials of eczema treatments: a systematic review
Q37029960Prospective registration, bias risk and outcome-reporting bias in randomised clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine: an empirical methodological study
Q56880296Protocols, probity, and publication
Q38108574Publication Bias, with a Focus on Psychiatry: Causes and Solutions
Q37520828Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
Q34476958Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Q33262004Publishing clinical trial results: the future beckons
Q46443569Quality of Registration for Clinical Trials Published in Emergency Medicine Journals
Q38096481Quality of reporting and its correlates among randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for cancer pain: application of the CONSORT 2010 Statement and STRICTA.
Q37894671Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials conducted in China on the treatment of cancer pain
Q55379543Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: What authors, reviewers and consumers should consider.
Q35088375Quantifying bias in randomized controlled trials in child health: a meta-epidemiological study
Q64971091RADIATE - Radial Dysplasia Assessment, Treatment and Aetiology: protocol for the development of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
Q38571344Randomized controlled trials and neuro-oncology: should alternative designs be considered?
Q91524859Randomized controlled trials on erectile dysfunction: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact (2007-2018)
Q90452396Recommendations for Increasing the Transparency of Analysis of Preexisting Data Sets
Q90382979Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Distal Radial Fracture Treatment
Q37066032Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review
Q21203744Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review
Q37071333Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review
Q37072945Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines
Q38185927Reporting of sources of funding in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry
Q37756241Reporting on covariate adjustment in randomised controlled trials before and after revision of the 2001 CONSORT statement: a literature review
Q38189499Research review: the role of diet in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder--an appraisal of the evidence on efficacy and recommendations on the design of future studies
Q38547161Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review.
Q34102963Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals
Q42081186Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study
Q24240095Risperidone dose for schizophrenia
Q56565523STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)-an extension of the STROBE statement
Q33405556STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement
Q37314650STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)--an extension of the STROBE statement
Q81156081Safety of influenza vaccines in children
Q51319344Scientific Reporting: Raising the Standards.
Q48094039Searching for trial protocols: A comparison of methods
Q26851180Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery
Q57278238Selective outcome reporting: telling and detecting true lies. The state of the science
Q36465424Single-drug therapy or selective decontamination of the digestive tract as antifungal prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review.
Q40657294Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
Q28750315Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study
Q38625478Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine.
Q26851473Standard 2: Containing Risk of Bias
Q26864374Statistical and methodological considerations for reporting RCTs in medical literature
Q24236219Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intra-uterine device
Q24201234Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device
Q56565671Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement
Q56565716Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement
Q35869658Systematic Differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Meta-Analyses on the Same Topic: A Matched Pair Analysis.
Q38193965Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological therapies for children with chronic pain.
Q37191497Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions
Q29619094Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
Q38669958Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals
Q37435503Systematic review: association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes.
Q21092360The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
Q27860581The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Q24282603The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey
Q36095314The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies
Q38141169The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
Q52562524The over-representation of significant p values in abstracts compared to corresponding full texts: A systematic review of surgical randomized trials
Q42940808The relation between publication bias and clinical trials funding
Q35155135The reporting of observational clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging studies: a systematic review
Q37641067The use of older studies in meta-analyses of medical interventions: a survey.
Q28535706Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals
Q50160426Trends in endpoint selection in clinical trials of advanced breast cancer
Q42519635Trial protocols at the BMJ.
Q90458774Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture
Q24289436Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis
Q26864790Typology of the primary outcome construction in dermatology: a systematic review of published randomized controlled trials
Q38121661US Food and Drug Administration documents can provide unpublished evidence relevant to systematic reviews
Q24289257US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
Q51497688Understanding of diabetes prevention studies: questionnaire survey of professionals in diabetes care
Q24194619Universal community-based social development interventions for preventing community violence by young people 12 to 18 years of age
Q94327976Universal community‐based social development interventions for preventing community violence by young people 12 to 18 years of age
Q38726201Variations in reporting of outcomes in randomized trials on diet and physical activity in pregnancy: A systematic review.
Q35431427What affects authors' and editors' use of reporting guidelines? Findings from an online survey and qualitative interviews
Q37677188What do clinical trials tell us about treating patients?
Q48582153Why Ineffective Psychotherapies Appear to Work: A Taxonomy of Causes of Spurious Therapeutic Effectiveness
Q83576948[The importance of analysis in published evidence levels]

Search more.