Are outcomes reported in surgical randomized trials patient-important? A systematic review and meta-analysis

scientific article published on February 2017

Are outcomes reported in surgical randomized trials patient-important? A systematic review and meta-analysis is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
meta-analysisQ815382

External links are
P356DOI10.1503/CJS.010616
P932PMC publication ID5373721
P698PubMed publication ID28234219

P50authorSam AdieQ96012961
P2093author name stringRajat Mittal
Ian A Harris
Justine M Naylor
P2860cites workEnhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide--the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane LibraryQ21093215
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsQ24614627
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ27860606
Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trialQ27860743
Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchQ28285027
Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression TrialQ28300531
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trialsQ29617910
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articlesQ29618882
Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary eventsQ29619609
Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trialQ34008233
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authorsQ34389549
Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarctionQ34415281
Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.Q34510811
Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 1.Q34545921
Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological studyQ34567058
Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMedQ34577274
The use of patient-centered outcome measures in radiology: a systematic reviewQ36637033
Methodological quality of patient-reported outcome research was low in complementary and alternative medicine in oncologyQ36650809
Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they?Q36749927
Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trialsQ40084535
Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled?Q41117631
Lessons from the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trialQ42150793
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventionsQ44320717
Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study GroupQ48527134
The idolatry of the surrogateQ57277556
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovationsQ57286518
Effect of intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy on bone mass and fracture rate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosisQ67283849
Users' guides to the medical literature: XIX. Applying clinical trial results. A. How to use an article measuring the effect of an intervention on surrogate end points. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupQ78175792
Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequencesQ84770750
P433issue2
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
meta-analysisQ815382
P304page(s)86-93
P577publication date2017-02-01
P1433published inCanadian Journal of SurgeryQ16646335
P1476titleAre outcomes reported in surgical randomized trials patient-important? A systematic review and meta-analysis
P478volume60

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q41910829Surrogate end points save lives
Q42337670Toward a "New School" of surgical research.
Q47139932Vers un « mouvement de l’éducation nouvelle » de recherche en chirurgie

Search more.