Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

scientific article published in June 2019

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJOPEN-2018-028694
P932PMC publication ID6549750
P698PubMed publication ID31154313

P50authorTimothy F Platts-MillsQ88007733
David L. SchrigerQ37840668
Sara SchroterQ42716349
P2093author name stringChristopher W Jones
Mark A Weaver
Benjamin S Misemer
Amanda Adams
P2860cites workOutcome Reporting Among Drug Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.govQ24289273
Association of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritisQ24289540
Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trialQ26797481
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic reviewQ27027065
Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical TrialsQ27205111
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articlesQ29618882
"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative studyQ30552717
Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional studyQ33654247
Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic reviewQ33751652
Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialistsQ33787792
Registering clinical trialsQ33799261
The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key IssuesQ33834724
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trialsQ34019194
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authorsQ34389549
Trial registration numbers are underreported in biomedical publicationsQ34482583
Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Reports in Surgery JournalsQ34616247
Outcome discrepancies and selective reporting: impacting the leading journals?Q35638261
The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editorsQ35682383
Clinical Trial Registration: The Time Has Come….Q35879262
Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trialsQ36531160
Data torturingQ36748376
Prospective registration, bias risk and outcome-reporting bias in randomised clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine: an empirical methodological studyQ37029960
Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review.Q37844916
Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic ReviewQ37967678
Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendationsQ38130370
Registration and design alterations of clinical trials in critical care: a cross-sectional observational studyQ38204934
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reportingQ38348363
Funding source and primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov are associated with the reporting of a statistically significant primary outcome: a cross-sectional studyQ39380635
Undisclosed changes in outcomes in randomized controlled trials: an observational studyQ41852043
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials of gastroenterology and hepatologyQ43661770
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventionsQ44320717
An integrated population-averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster-unit trialsQ44398462
Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancerQ44617042
Quality of Registration for Clinical Trials Published in Emergency Medicine JournalsQ46443569
Selective outcome reporting and sponsorship in randomized controlled trials in IVF and ICSI.Q47940411
The Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial: Evaluation by Rolling DeploymentQ49951352
Primary outcome switching among drug trials with and without principal investigator financial ties to industry: a cross-sectional studyQ50035929
Registering clinical trialsQ52953198
Comparison of Arthroplasty Trial Publications After Registration in ClinicalTrials.govQ53093937
Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Q55038991
Misleading abstract conclusions in randomized controlled trials in rheumatology: Comparison of the abstract conclusions and the results sectionQ57779733
Many Randomized Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions Are Not Adequately Registered: A Survey of 200 Published TrialsQ60679406
ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working GroupQ73110915
Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchwordQ83817845
Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery JournalsQ86890849
P433issue5
P921main subjectpeer reviewQ215028
P304page(s)e028694
P577publication date2019-06-01
P1433published inBMJ OpenQ17003470
P1476titlePeer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
P478volume9

Search more.