Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study

scientific article

Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1136/BMJ.B4012
P8608Fatcat IDrelease_mo54hgckwray3acumi3kynga2e
P932PMC publication ID2764034
P698PubMed publication ID19841007
P5875ResearchGate publication ID38022059

P50authorMaria B. OspinaQ38304648
Lisa HartlingQ87858561
P2093author name stringTerry P Klassen
Yuanyuan Liang
Nicola Hooton
Donna M Dryden
Jennifer Krebs Seida
P2860cites workEmpirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological studyQ24653790
A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal toolsQ24799070
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical DataQ26778373
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesQ27860655
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsQ27860735
Meta-analysis in clinical trialsQ27860779
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?Q27860973
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsQ29618659
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articlesQ29618882
Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analysesQ29619185
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Q29619328
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysisQ29619369
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trialsQ29619671
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.Q33663862
Guidelines for reading literature reviews.Q34101375
The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviewsQ34299666
Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.Q34370675
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authorsQ34389549
How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.Q35065178
Bias in clinical intervention research.Q36380552
Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analysesQ36851217
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklistsQ40996403
Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?Q51060887
Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' researchQ52036957
Acceptable values of kappa for comparison of two groupsQ52861608
Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trialsQ52874177
Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the society for pediatric research meeting: an example of publication biasQ52939136
Correction: Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-AnalysesQ57389621
Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic testsQ72579562
Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trialsQ74251746
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectbiasQ742736
P304page(s)b4012
P577publication date2009-10-19
P1433published inThe BMJQ546003
P1476titleRisk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study
P478volume339

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q34844852A Comparison of Frameworks Evaluating Evidence for Global Health Interventions
Q33777611A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007.
Q38287843A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials
Q90178905Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions
Q33728984Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review
Q47554051Applying the ROBINS-I tool to natural experiments: an example from public health.
Q33841989Applying the Risk of Bias Tool in a Systematic Review of Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids for Persistent Asthma
Q38111237Assessing risk of bias in randomised clinical trials included in Cochrane Reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge
Q37779121Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research
Q26853252Association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and osteoarthritis: a systematic review
Q28651692Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
Q53085491Basics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the nephrologist
Q24234543Blinded versus unblinded assessments of risk of bias in studies included in a systematic review
Q57286428Classification systems to improve assessment of risk of bias
Q35850944Comparison of aerobic exercise, diet or both on lipids and lipoproteins in adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q33714398Continuous venovenous hemofiltration in the management of paraquat poisoning: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q34166213Controlled trials in children: quantity, methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of pediatric controlled trials published 1948-2006.
Q55494444Critical appraisal of RCTs by 3rd year undergraduates after short courses in EBM compared to expert appraisal.
Q34040504Development and validation of reporting guidelines for studies involving data linkage
Q38372326Development of a combined database for meta-epidemiological research
Q38975603Development of the anatomical quality assessment (AQUA) tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
Q30868881Diagnostic yield of MRI for pediatric hearing loss: a systematic review
Q30409335Diagnostic yield of computed tomography scan for pediatric hearing loss: a systematic review
Q64089641Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design
Q30528569Do health care institutions value research? A mixed methods study of barriers and facilitators to methodological rigor in pediatric randomized trials
Q57073929Do liposomal bupivacaine infiltration and interscalene nerve block provide similar pain relief after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Q37790031Does stentless aortic valve implantation increase perioperative risk? A critical appraisal of the literature and risk of bias analysis
Q34495688Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review
Q24632762Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis
Q38287912Early versus late tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Q34652754Education in health research methodology: use of a wiki for knowledge translation
Q35143189Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft treatment for fractures in adults: a meta-analysis
Q38932863Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study
Q38286202Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol
Q33575141Effectiveness and efficiency of primary care based case management for chronic diseases: rationale and design of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials [CRD32009100316]
Q38358985Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Self-Help for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in People with Long-Term Physical Health Conditions: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Q38614297Effects of Exercise on Falls, Balance, and Gait Ability in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis.
Q26747663Efficacy and Safety of Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists for Euvolemic or Hypervolemic Hyponatremia: A Meta-Analysis
Q41138916Efficacy and safety of bortezomib maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
Q38872658Efficacy and tolerability of muscle relaxants for low back pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Q57281041Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen in multimodal management for pain relief following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
Q24632223Efficacy of vitamin and antioxidant supplements in prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Q38204523Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
Q36887082Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
Q35677219Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores
Q36584276Exercise and Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Q44451813Exercise and bone mineral density in men: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q33560462Exercise and global well-being in community-dwelling adults with fibromyalgia: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Q35655217Failure of a numerical quality assessment scale to identify potential risk of bias in a systematic review: a comparison study.
Q38909023Gabapentin for Perioperative Analgesia in Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: Systematic Review
Q26782173HELPinKids&Adults; Knowledge Synthesis of the Management of Vaccination Pain and High Levels of Needle Fear: Limitations of the Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research
Q35496622How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study.
Q37364272How should we evaluate the risk of bias of physical therapy trials?: a psychometric and meta-epidemiological approach towards developing guidelines for the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs in Physical Therapy (PT) area: a study protocol
Q27692649Impact of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and acetaminophen on sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review
Q38067213Impact of support on the effectiveness of written cognitive behavioural self-help: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Q33927651Improving the adherence of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with pharmacy care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Q37359720Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis.
Q38031458Inter-rater and test–retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle–Ottawa Scales
Q37113179Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
Q34228418Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?
Q47154784Is research quality in orthopedic manual therapy trials stagnating? Reflections and pathways for improving research quality and advance our profession.
Q35586847Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review
Q47282966Is there an association between study size and reporting of study quality in dermatological clinical trials? A meta-epidemiological review.
Q56880237Knowledge synthesis
Q33757803Lifestyle interventions targeting body weight changes during the menopause transition: a systematic review.
Q38090466Long-acting versus short-acting methylphenidate for paediatric ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative efficacy
Q38667172Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews.
Q64061885Machine learning to help researchers evaluate biases in clinical trials: a prospective, randomized user study
Q34571024Medication reviews for nursing home residents to reduce mortality and hospitalization: systematic review and meta-analysis
Q34454354Meta-epidemiology
Q34236021Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study
Q89945365Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Q53149792Mosapride treatment for functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis
Q57688932Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents
Q24187107Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents
Q96304551Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment-A State-of-the-Art Review on Methodological Characteristics and Stimulation Parameters
Q34445701Obstetric outcomes after treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis
Q35270537Osteoporosis and bone fractures in alcoholic liver disease: a meta-analysis
Q35687815PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study
Q47095065Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus fluoroscopic gastrostomy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) sufferers with nutritional impairment: A meta-analysis of current studies
Q31161134Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials
Q38520053Practicalities of using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised and non-randomised study designs applied in a health technology assessment setting
Q38974921Preliminary evidence on the uptake, use and benefits of the CONSORT-PRO extension
Q91644124Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Q24186991Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Q24235039Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Q26774317Protocol for a systematic review of psychological interventions for cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment cancer survivors
Q24197510Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents
Q38520450Quality assessment of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies: our experience using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool.
Q37949341Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials published in the korean journal of urology over the past 20 years
Q38098101Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes
Q35088375Quantifying bias in randomized controlled trials in child health: a meta-epidemiological study
Q30580682Randomized controlled trials in pediatric critical care: a scoping review
Q26783200Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews
Q31133826Relative efficacy of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and topical capsaicin in osteoarthritis: protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis
Q53085442Reliability of 3 Assessment Tools Used to Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials for Treatment of Neck Pain
Q39095990Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomised trials in health professions education.
Q92130906Risk of bias and reporting completeness of randomised controlled trials in burn care: protocol for a systematic review
Q64068700Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
Q34102963Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals
Q27207060RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials
Q34515229Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol
Q34413025Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
Q26865413Sodium Oxybate for Narcolepsy with Cataplexy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Q36632303Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in Canada: a multi-method study-study protocol
Q84740622StaR Child Health: an initiative for RCTs in children
Q38254720StaR Child Health: developing evidence-based guidance for the design, conduct and reporting of paediatric trials
Q53143992StaR Child Health: developing evidence-based guidance for the design, conduct, and reporting of pediatric trials
Q26851473Standard 2: Containing Risk of Bias
Q36023895Supportive care for men with prostate cancer: why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials
Q38631977Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Q38109819Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy
Q36294542Systematic review of the methodological quality of controlled trials evaluating Chinese herbal medicine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Q35319558T'ai chi for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Q27860509The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Q38966337The Effect of Molecular Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Clinical Outcomes in Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Q60922088The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies
Q45782911The efficacy of tranexamic acid using oral administration in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Q38141169The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
Q38685735The impact of cholecalciferol supplementation on the systemic inflammatory profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials
Q38320519The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review
Q37915611Timing of dressing removal in the healing of surgical wounds by primary intention: quantitative systematic review protocol.
Q38986450Timing of hypertonic saline inhalation for cystic fibrosis
Q89928661Timing of hypertonic saline inhalation for cystic fibrosis
Q52655531Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
Q30409029Ubiquitous aspirin: a systematic review of its impact on sensorineural hearing loss
Q34443977Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised placebo-controlled trials
Q38831176Vitamin D supplementation for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Q36427360What is the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in the elderly population in developed countries? A systematic critical literature review

Search more.