| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.PUB2 |
| P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_vjczo6av2vaptdzvsf2o5ajigq |
| P3181 | OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID | 1453912 |
| P932 | PMC publication ID | 8191366 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 25271098 |
| P50 | author | Joanne E. McKenzie | Q47188116 |
| Sally E. Green | Q55545418 | ||
| Matthew J Page | Q56477440 | ||
| Jamie Kirkham | Q57374195 | ||
| Andrew Forbes | Q61634021 | ||
| Sharon F Kramer | Q82101510 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Kerry Dwan | |
| P2860 | cites work | Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews | Q21144675 |
| Establishing a new journal for systematic review products | Q21195846 | ||
| Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals | Q24197568 | ||
| The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews | Q24199056 | ||
| Blinded versus unblinded assessments of risk of bias in studies included in a systematic review | Q24234543 | ||
| Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials | Q24235035 | ||
| PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility | Q24288905 | ||
| Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet | Q45852240 | ||
| Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials | Q52603476 | ||
| Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package | Q58423162 | ||
| Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data | Q63018176 | ||
| Characteristics of meta-analyses related to acceptance for publication in a medical journal | Q74139058 | ||
| Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes | Q83374039 | ||
| Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study | Q24597537 | ||
| An empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol | Q24633869 | ||
| A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature | Q24813491 | ||
| Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review | Q26851424 | ||
| Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials | Q26995587 | ||
| Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement | Q27860537 | ||
| The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration | Q27860647 | ||
| Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis | Q27860672 | ||
| Meta-analysis in clinical trials | Q27860779 | ||
| Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label use | Q28264491 | ||
| Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases | Q28274123 | ||
| Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research | Q28285027 | ||
| Differences in Reporting of Analyses in Internal Company Documents Versus Published Trial Reports: Comparisons in Industry-Sponsored Trials in Off-Label Uses of Gabapentin | Q28485343 | ||
| An international registry of systematic-review protocols | Q28736157 | ||
| Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square Root | Q29397126 | ||
| Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews | Q29547775 | ||
| Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles | Q29618882 | ||
| Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias | Q29619094 | ||
| How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews | Q30483437 | ||
| Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews: an international consultation | Q30485220 | ||
| Combining follow-up and change data is valid in meta-analyses of continuous outcomes: a meta-epidemiological study | Q30642915 | ||
| Case study of the comparison of data from conference abstracts and full-text articles in health technology assessment of rapidly evolving technologies: does it make a difference? | Q31061524 | ||
| Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned | Q31064822 | ||
| Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis | Q33209578 | ||
| Can Cochrane Reviews in controversial areas be biased? A sensitivity analysis based on the protocol of a Systematic Cochrane Review on low-level laser therapy in osteoarthritis. | Q33226394 | ||
| A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in maternal medicine | Q33285704 | ||
| Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review | Q33327185 | ||
| Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results | Q33328144 | ||
| Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols | Q33389750 | ||
| Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process | Q33546393 | ||
| A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | Q33582817 | ||
| Epidemiology, Quality, and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture Interventions Published in Chinese Journals | Q33685064 | ||
| Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration | Q33834056 | ||
| What is the quality of the implemented meta-analytic procedures in chronic pain treatment meta-analyses? | Q33878147 | ||
| Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials | Q34019194 | ||
| Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense | Q34275122 | ||
| Assessment of the risk of bias in rehabilitation reviews | Q34325151 | ||
| The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation | Q34372258 | ||
| The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence | Q34373168 | ||
| Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors | Q34389549 | ||
| Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature | Q34419416 | ||
| An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs). | Q34558486 | ||
| PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts | Q34667712 | ||
| Validation of an index of the quality of review articles | Q34762592 | ||
| Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis | Q34781810 | ||
| Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy. | Q34961789 | ||
| Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review | Q35082900 | ||
| Article Alerts: Items from 2011, Part I. | Q35656564 | ||
| Article alerts: Introduction and items from 2009, part I. | Q35657611 | ||
| Article alerts: Items from 2009, Part II. | Q35659839 | ||
| Article alerts: items from 2010, part I. | Q35660013 | ||
| Article Alerts: items from 2010, Part II. | Q35660163 | ||
| Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis | Q36296533 | ||
| Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies | Q36399994 | ||
| Overview of systematic reviews on invasive treatment of stable coronary artery disease. | Q36434981 | ||
| Reanalysis of systematic reviews: the case of invasive strategies for acute coronary syndromes | Q36597846 | ||
| Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews | Q37237919 | ||
| Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review | Q37327281 | ||
| Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study | Q37579463 | ||
| The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews | Q37692721 | ||
| Reporting of effect direction and size in abstracts of systematic reviews | Q37954171 | ||
| Underreporting research is scientific misconduct | Q38050046 | ||
| Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews | Q38075742 | ||
| Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups | Q38075920 | ||
| Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. | Q38106498 | ||
| Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation | Q38112640 | ||
| Issues relating to selective reporting when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions | Q38520309 | ||
| Review article: critical review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials in hepatogastroenterology | Q41467425 | ||
| Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: an assessment of published reviews | Q41491361 | ||
| Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews | Q42910882 | ||
| P433 | issue | 10 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | bias | Q742736 |
| systematic review | Q1504425 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | MR000035 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2014-10-01 | |
| P13046 | publication type of scholarly work | systematic review | Q1504425 |
| P1433 | published in | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | Q15750361 |
| P1476 | title | Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions |
| Q41368858 | 'Spin' in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review |
| Q50058353 | A low proportion of systematic reviews in physical therapy are registered: a survey of 150 published systematic reviews. |
| Q92515344 | A protocol developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for infertility |
| Q53834783 | A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer. |
| Q36205093 | A systematic review of the outcomes reported in trials of medication review in older patients: the need for a core outcome set. |
| Q92053809 | Adherence to clinical trial registration in countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2015 |
| Q98569237 | Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with first-trimester exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q24633869 | An empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol |
| Q58102151 | Carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers for adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices |
| Q57122782 | Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting |
| Q31042693 | Consent and confidentiality in the light of recent demands for data sharing |
| Q28069515 | Core outcome sets and systematic reviews |
| Q92086051 | Describing the first 2000 registrations to the Research Registry®: A study protocol |
| Q41632588 | Development of a core outcome set for medication review in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a study protocol |
| Q92760205 | Development of a core outcome set for traumatic brachial plexus injuries (COMBINE): study protocol |
| Q35774634 | Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews |
| Q64282542 | Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Transplantation Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
| Q35887528 | Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design |
| Q91623782 | Follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women with gestational diabetes treated with insulin and/or oral glucose-lowering agents: a core outcome set using a Delphi survey |
| Q55020377 | Guidelines for safe handling of hazardous drugs: A systematic review. |
| Q33814405 | Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study |
| Q92936809 | Impact of health service interventions on acute hospital use in community-dwelling persons with dementia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
| Q43064281 | Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors |
| Q50042913 | International core outcome set for clinical trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy. |
| Q38819296 | Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study |
| Q90275500 | Journal impact factor, trial effect size, and methodological quality appear scantly related: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q56456331 | L-ornithine L-aspartate for prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis |
| Q55383556 | Mapping the characteristics of network meta-analyses on drug therapy: A systematic review. |
| Q36215944 | Methods for Developing Evidence Reviews in Short Periods of Time: A Scoping Review |
| Q24185782 | Non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and lactulose versus lactitol for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis |
| Q24185895 | Non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and lactulose versus lactitol for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis |
| Q28598096 | Outcome Reporting Bias in Government-Sponsored Policy Evaluations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of 13 Studies |
| Q89661668 | Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study |
| Q90407461 | Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis |
| Q92086426 | Outcomes for Pressure Ulcer Trials (OUTPUTs): protocol for the development of a core domain set for trials evaluating the clinical efficacy or effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention interventions |
| Q49420720 | Pharmacotherapies for fatigue in chronic liver disease (CLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis (protocol). |
| Q21195843 | Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement |
| Q90242079 | Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry |
| Q49795367 | Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting |
| Q53276133 | Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication. |
| Q42400549 | Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better? |
| Q93161539 | Selective reporting bias in randomised controlled trials from two network meta-analyses: comparison of clinical trial registrations and their respective publications |
| Q60907941 | Serious adverse events reported in placebo randomised controlled trials of oral naltrexone: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q64096399 | Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews |
| Q27316649 | Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations |
| Q49900479 | Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys |
| Q38673534 | Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality |
| Q64089732 | Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults |
| Q37356008 | Systematic review protocol assessing the processes for linking clinical trial registries and their published results |
| Q33877196 | The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. |
| Q37261758 | The First 500 Registrations to the Research Registry®: Advancing Registration of Under-Registered Study Types |
| Q42332685 | The Journal Impact Factor: Moving Toward an Alternative and Combined Scientometric Approach. |
| Q90053624 | The Use of (Network) Meta-Analysis in Clinical Oncology |
| Q90656755 | The development of a cryptoglandular Anal Fistula Core Outcome Set (AFCOS): an international Delphi study protocol |
| Q90166039 | The effects of industry funding and positive outcomes in the interpretation of clinical trial results: a randomized trial among Dutch psychiatrists |
| Q42341357 | The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review. |
| Q57170319 | The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors |
| Q35845397 | Transparency of Outcome Reporting and Trial Registration of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology |
| Q47400990 | Treatment of drug-resistant fibromyalgia symptoms using high-intensity laser therapy: a case-based review |
| Q38722378 | Trends in 'poor responder' research: lessons learned from RCTs in assisted conception |
| Q92567936 | Under-utilisation of reproducible, child appropriate or patient reported outcome measures in childhood uveitis interventional research |
| Q24188293 | Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane? |
Search more.