| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| review article | Q7318358 |
| P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1101124361 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1186/S13643-018-0699-4 |
| P2888 | exact match | https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-018-0699-4 |
| P932 | PMC publication ID | 5819709 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 29463298 |
| P50 | author | Matthew J Page | Q56477440 |
| Andrea C. Tricco | Q60370623 | ||
| Larissa Shamseer | Q29998743 | ||
| P2860 | cites work | The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration | Q21092360 |
| Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews | Q21144675 | ||
| Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement | Q21195843 | ||
| Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 | Q21534928 | ||
| Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement | Q21562278 | ||
| Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency | Q24052598 | ||
| Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions | Q24193207 | ||
| Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors | Q55894706 | ||
| How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO | Q56880231 | ||
| PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility | Q24288905 | ||
| How open science helps researchers succeed | Q27313486 | ||
| SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture | Q28608410 | ||
| An international registry of systematic-review protocols | Q28736157 | ||
| The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews | Q28736175 | ||
| Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation | Q29615706 | ||
| Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews: an international consultation | Q30485220 | ||
| Alignment of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effectiveness with global burden-of-disease data: a bibliographic analysis | Q30936353 | ||
| Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry | Q31167434 | ||
| Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process | Q33546393 | ||
| Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense | Q34275122 | ||
| Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability. | Q35347819 | ||
| A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews | Q35917641 | ||
| Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study | Q36027782 | ||
| Methods for Developing Evidence Reviews in Short Periods of Time: A Scoping Review | Q36215944 | ||
| An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist | Q37375356 | ||
| Network meta-analyses performed by contracting companies and commissioned by industry | Q37440674 | ||
| Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews | Q38405509 | ||
| Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy | Q38607795 | ||
| Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis | Q38772282 | ||
| A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study | Q38808617 | ||
| Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study | Q38819296 | ||
| Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification. | Q38859085 | ||
| The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses | Q38952676 | ||
| Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness? | Q38952681 | ||
| Living systematic review 1: Introduction - the Why, What, When and How. | Q40040379 | ||
| Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. | Q41689458 | ||
| Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis | Q46268654 | ||
| Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions | Q47637341 | ||
| Are orthodontic systematic reviews registered a priori in PROSPERO? | Q48021050 | ||
| P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
| P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
| P433 | issue | 1 | |
| P921 | main subject | bibliometrics | Q603441 |
| systematic review | Q1504425 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 32 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2018-02-20 | |
| P1433 | published in | Systematic Reviews | Q18216009 |
| P1476 | title | Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting. | |
| P478 | volume | 7 |
| Q64096975 | A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017 |
| Q89886548 | Epidemiology of Injuries Sustained by Civilians and Local Combatants in Contemporary Armed Conflict: An Appeal for a Shared Trauma Registry Among Humanitarian Actors |
| Q64097464 | Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews |
| Q98157744 | PATIENT VOICES, a project for the integration of the systematic assessment of patient reported outcomes and experiences within a comprehensive cancer center: a protocol for a mixed method feasibility study |
| Q58112245 | Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| Q90242079 | Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry |
| Q107975992 | Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews |
| Q89536825 | Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults - Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review |
| Q92604641 | Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation |
| Q92157561 | The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research |
| Q90053624 | The Use of (Network) Meta-Analysis in Clinical Oncology |
| Q89650493 | The evolving role of surface electromyography in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review |
| Q90206751 | Towards a new model for producing evidence-based guidelines: a qualitative study of current approaches and opportunities for innovation among Australian guideline developers |
Search more.