Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions

scientific article published on 4 November 2017

Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2017.10.017
P698PubMed publication ID29113936

P50authorDouglas G. AltmanQ5300242
Ferrán Catalá-LópezQ28606975
Larissa ShamseerQ29998743
Matthew J PageQ56477440
Dianna WolfeQ57374218
Andrea C. TriccoQ60370623
David MoherQ28036061
P2093author name stringJoanne E McKenzie
Fatemeh Yazdi
Nadera Ahmadzai
P2860cites workBadges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing TransparencyQ24052598
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology researchQ24273259
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical LiteratureQ24288789
How open science helps researchers succeedQ27313486
P921main subjectreproducibilityQ1425625
systematic reviewQ1504425
P577publication date2017-11-04
P1433published inJournal of Clinical EpidemiologyQ6294959
P1476titleReproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q47101677A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
Q91673648Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey
Q49795367Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Q58601475Reported methods for handling missing change standard deviations in meta-analyses of exercise therapy interventions in patients with heart failure: A systematic review
Q89722246Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis
Q59793592Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017

Search more.