Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews

scientific article published on 27 February 2019

Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0211919
P932PMC publication ID6392271
P698PubMed publication ID30811451

P50authorPedro J Gómez-AriasQ90674010
Isabel Viguera-GuerraQ91964305
Jesús Gay-MimbreraQ42333733
Juan RuanoQ47504387
P2093author name stringAntonio Vélez García-Nieto
Beatriz Isla-Tejera
Francisco Gómez-Garcia
Juan Luis Sanz-Cabanillas
Ana Montilla
José Fernández-Chaichio
Jose Luis Fernández-Rueda
Macarena Aguilar-Luque
P2860cites workMeta-research: Why research on research matters.Q52658008
A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.Q53834783
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statementQ21195843
Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review processQ33546393
Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?Q34268786
Clinical Epidemiology (CE) and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in the Asia Pacific region (Round Table Forum).Q34691619
Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic ReviewsQ35774634
Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasisQ36344986
Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studiesQ37027187
The role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in dermatology.Q38052360
A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register studyQ38808617
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesQ38952676
A mapping of 115,000 randomized trials revealed a mismatch between research effort and health needs in non-high-income regions.Q48513585
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.Q49795367
Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search.Q50138644
Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool.Q50147443
Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.Q50420123
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue2
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcollaborationQ1145523
systematic reviewQ1504425
research effortQ122213582
P304page(s)e0211919
P577publication date2019-02-27
P1433published inPLOS OneQ564954
P1476titleEvolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews
P478volume14

Reverse relations

Q98770754An assessment of the extent to which the contents of PROSPERO records meet the systematic review protocol reporting items in PRISMA-Pcites workP2860

Search more.