Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.

scientific article published on 9 March 2018

Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1101401349
P356DOI10.1186/S13643-018-0709-6
P2888exact matchhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-018-0709-6
P932PMC publication ID5845292
P698PubMed publication ID29523200

P50authorMacarena Aguilar-LuqueQ59694834
Juan Luís Sanz-CabanillasQ87634182
Jesús Gay-MimbreraQ42333733
Juan RuanoQ47504387
P2093author name stringBeatriz Isla-Tejera
Francisco Gómez-García
Antonio Velez Garcia-Nieto
Marcelino Gonzalez-Padilla
Patricia Alcalde-Mellado
José Luis Hernández Romero
Isabel Viguera-Guerra
Francisco Franco-García
Jesús Fernández-Chaichio
José Luis Fernández-Rueda
Manuel Cárdenas-Aranzana
Pedro J Carmona-Fernandez
P2860cites workEpidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviewsQ21144675
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription JournalsQ22665458
Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was plannedQ31064822
Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review processQ33546393
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional StudyQ36027782
Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasisQ36344986
A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register studyQ38808617
Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.Q39153329
Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology researchQ39431249
Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological studyQ47096031
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.Q48246817
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue1
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
study protocolQ111908491
P304page(s)43
P577publication date2018-03-09
P1433published inSystematic ReviewsQ18216009
P1476titleEvaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol
P478volume7

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q98770754An assessment of the extent to which the contents of PROSPERO records meet the systematic review protocol reporting items in PRISMA-P
Q64097464Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews
Q58112245Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Q64247576The effectiveness and safety of cervus and cucumis polypeptide injection in promoting fracture healing after bone fracture surgeries: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Search more.