| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P819 | ADS bibcode | 2010PLoSO...5.9810K |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0009810 |
| P932 | PMC publication ID | 2842442 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 20339557 |
| P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 42589677 |
| P50 | author | Paula Williamson | Q21264497 |
| P2093 | author name string | Jamie J Kirkham | |
| Doug G Altman | |||
| P2860 | cites work | The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration | Q21092360 |
| Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews | Q21144675 | ||
| Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias | Q29619094 | ||
| Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned | Q31064822 | ||
| Registering systematic reviews | Q33575442 | ||
| Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. | Q34513646 | ||
| A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals | Q34545769 | ||
| The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews | Q37692721 | ||
| P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
| P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | bias | Q742736 |
| systematic review | Q1504425 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | e9810 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2010-03-22 | |
| P1433 | published in | PLOS One | Q564954 |
| P1476 | title | Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process | |
| P478 | volume | 5 |
| Q36075955 | A hierarchy of patient-reported outcomes for meta-analysis of knee osteoarthritis trials: empirical evidence from a survey of high impact journals |
| Q50058353 | A low proportion of systematic reviews in physical therapy are registered: a survey of 150 published systematic reviews. |
| Q61849594 | A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies |
| Q28736157 | An international registry of systematic-review protocols |
| Q36297521 | Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews |
| Q48021050 | Are orthodontic systematic reviews registered a priori in PROSPERO? |
| Q24203947 | Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis |
| Q47292371 | Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis |
| Q33834056 | Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration |
| Q24193207 | Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions |
| Q24198908 | Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions |
| Q44617042 | Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer |
| Q38935225 | Clinical trials and systematic reviews addressing similar interventions for the same condition do not consider similar outcomes to be important: a case study in HIV/AIDS. |
| Q55313647 | Comparative safety and effectiveness of perinatal antiretroviral therapies for HIV-infected women and their children: Systematic review and network meta-analysis including different study designs. |
| Q40052919 | Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| Q58758423 | Correction of Hyponatremia May Be a Treatment Stratification Biomarker: A Two-Stage Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| Q35774634 | Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews |
| Q36297526 | Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? |
| Q38358985 | Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Self-Help for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in People with Long-Term Physical Health Conditions: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
| Q36558151 | Effectiveness of physical activity and dietary interventions in South Asian populations: a systematic review |
| Q47114123 | Effects of Intensive Control of Glycemia on Clinical Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Compared with Standard Control: A Meta-Analysis. |
| Q50420123 | Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol. |
| Q64097464 | Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews |
| Q104501940 | Fixed orthodontic retainers and periodontal health |
| Q56880231 | How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO |
| Q28611347 | Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research |
| Q24200692 | Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents |
| Q42954133 | Open Medicine endorses PROSPERO. |
| Q90407461 | Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis |
| Q35347819 | Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability. |
| Q47745738 | Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study). |
| Q21195843 | Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement |
| Q24197717 | Progabide add-on for refractory epilepsy |
| Q90242079 | Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry |
| Q92222847 | Quality Assessment of Systematic Review of the Bariatric Surgery for Diabetes Mellitus |
| Q39433845 | Quality and consistency of outcome reporting in clinical trials of immunosuppression in renal transplantation |
| Q35533066 | Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis |
| Q64237286 | Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement |
| Q49795367 | Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting. |
| Q58185709 | Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO |
| Q47245400 | Restrictive or responsive? Outcome classification and unplanned sub-group analyses in meta-analyses |
| Q42400549 | Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better? |
| Q34781810 | Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis |
| Q93119832 | Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
| Q64096399 | Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews |
| Q26866555 | Steps in the undertaking of a systematic review in orthopaedic surgery |
| Q24194577 | Surgical management of functional bladder outlet obstruction in adults with neurogenic bladder dysfunction |
| Q42341357 | The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review. |
| Q91997294 | Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review |
| Q34655606 | Visualization of evidence-based medicine domain knowledge: production and citation of Cochrane systematic reviews |
Search more.