| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | John Ioannidis | Q6251482 |
| P2860 | cites work | Trust but Verify: Trial Registration and Determining Fidelity to the Protocol | Q46134381 |
| Lessons learned from a prospective meta-analysis | Q47645129 | ||
| The automation of systematic reviews | Q51278060 | ||
| Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research | Q52036957 | ||
| Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies: a metaepidemiologic approach | Q52920486 | ||
| Ranking antidepressants | Q53056709 | ||
| Seeding trials: just say "no". | Q53133726 | ||
| Trusting researchers to use open trial registers such as PROSPERO responsibly. | Q55057430 | ||
| How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of health care interventions? | Q73613994 | ||
| Antidepressants and suicide. The history of a controversy--and where it stands today | Q80700808 | ||
| An evidence-based medicine methodology to bridge the gap between clinical and environmental health sciences | Q84069114 | ||
| Beyond conflict of interest. Non-financial conflicts of interest are more serious than financial conflicts | Q95796326 | ||
| Why most published research findings are false | Q21092395 | ||
| Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews | Q21144675 | ||
| The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews | Q21559463 | ||
| Drug discovery in jeopardy | Q22306297 | ||
| Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research | Q22348097 | ||
| Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy | Q23791313 | ||
| The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews | Q24199056 | ||
| Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy | Q24273209 | ||
| Following 411 Cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study | Q24288733 | ||
| How to make more published research true | Q24288766 | ||
| Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? | Q24288768 | ||
| Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature | Q24288789 | ||
| PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility | Q24288905 | ||
| Effectiveness of antidepressants: an evidence myth constructed from a thousand randomized trials? | Q24288917 | ||
| Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? | Q24289042 | ||
| Partisan perspectives in the medical literature: a study of high frequency editorialists favoring hormone replacement therapy | Q24289488 | ||
| Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses | Q24289547 | ||
| Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments | Q24568345 | ||
| Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste | Q24707976 | ||
| Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis | Q24718169 | ||
| A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature | Q24813491 | ||
| Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review | Q26828986 | ||
| Dissemination bias in systematic reviews of animal research: a systematic review | Q28080709 | ||
| The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration | Q28131636 | ||
| Sea change in open science and data sharing: leadership by industry | Q28656418 | ||
| The power of meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies | Q28658972 | ||
| High reprint orders in medical journals and pharmaceutical industry funding: case-control study | Q28727838 | ||
| The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews | Q28736175 | ||
| Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? | Q29547529 | ||
| Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation | Q29615706 | ||
| Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis | Q29619093 | ||
| How evidence-based medicine is failing due to biased trials and selective publication. | Q30362457 | ||
| How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews | Q30483437 | ||
| Ushering in a new era of open science through data sharing: the wall must come down | Q30486017 | ||
| Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation | Q30841561 | ||
| Reanalyses of randomized clinical trial data | Q30849007 | ||
| Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusions | Q33368267 | ||
| Promotional Tone in Reviews of Menopausal Hormone Therapy After the Women's Health Initiative: An Analysis of Published Articles | Q33851285 | ||
| Reviewing the reviews. How strong is the evidence? How clear are the conclusions? | Q33956588 | ||
| Comparative benefits and harms of second-generation antidepressants for treating major depressive disorder: an updated meta-analysis | Q34029684 | ||
| Multisystem failure: the story of anti-influenza drugs | Q34040533 | ||
| Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies. | Q34155600 | ||
| The False-positive to False-negative Ratio in Epidemiologic Studies | Q34178142 | ||
| The medical review article: state of the science | Q34191468 | ||
| Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? | Q34268786 | ||
| The Cochrane Collaboration. | Q34340498 | ||
| Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence | Q34494429 | ||
| Meta-analyses with industry involvement are massively published and report no caveats for antidepressants | Q34495405 | ||
| A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals | Q34545769 | ||
| Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals | Q34661945 | ||
| The Geometric Increase in Meta-Analyses from China in the Genomic Era | Q34775813 | ||
| Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases | Q34844822 | ||
| The methodology for developing a prospective meta-analysis in the family planning community | Q35011344 | ||
| Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review | Q35082900 | ||
| The proposed rule for U.S. clinical trial registration and results submission | Q35130427 | ||
| Systematic reviews of animal studies; missing link in translational research? | Q35132083 | ||
| Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. | Q35200686 | ||
| Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry | Q35764811 | ||
| A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction | Q35879688 | ||
| Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study | Q36027782 | ||
| Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal | Q36053431 | ||
| Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences | Q36130841 | ||
| Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study | Q36248519 | ||
| Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis | Q36420861 | ||
| Why have meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the association between non-white-blood-cell-reduced allogeneic blood transfusion and postoperative infection produced discordant results? | Q36936374 | ||
| Interpreting discordant indirect and multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: an evaluation of direct acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection | Q36984876 | ||
| Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies | Q37027187 | ||
| Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis. | Q37070233 | ||
| Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review. | Q37149764 | ||
| Systematic analysis of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) reviews: proliferation of low-quality reviews overwhelms the results of well-performed meta-analyses | Q37199531 | ||
| Evaluation of meta-analyses in the otolaryngological literature | Q37227360 | ||
| An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist | Q37375356 | ||
| Field-wide meta-analyses of observational associations can map selective availability of risk factors and the impact of model specifications | Q37412229 | ||
| AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program | Q37549075 | ||
| Publication of trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute | Q37592322 | ||
| Twenty years of meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery: has quality kept up with quantity? | Q37667349 | ||
| Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses? | Q38057181 | ||
| Most meta-analyses of drug interventions have narrow scopes and many focus on specific agents | Q38079314 | ||
| Ensuring the integrity of clinical practice guidelines: a tool for protecting patients | Q38138934 | ||
| Financial conflicts of interest and conclusions about neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: an analysis of systematic reviews | Q38256986 | ||
| Completeness of main outcomes across randomized trials in entire discipline: survey of chronic lung disease outcomes in preterm infants | Q38333214 | ||
| Development of a combined database for meta-epidemiological research | Q38372326 | ||
| The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations | Q38510678 | ||
| The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014). | Q38943784 | ||
| Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology | Q39467950 | ||
| The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care | Q40756644 | ||
| Meta-research: The art of getting it wrong | Q40849885 | ||
| Meta-analysis: current issues in research synthesis | Q40936213 | ||
| Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Resolving discordant meta-analyses | Q40936486 | ||
| Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction | Q41112231 | ||
| A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews | Q41481576 | ||
| Why data sharing should be the expected norm | Q42605031 | ||
| Why we can't trust clinical guidelines | Q43835785 | ||
| The case for duplication of meta-analyses and systematic reviews | Q44063501 | ||
| Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best? | Q45954443 | ||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | meta-analysis | Q815382 |
| systematic review | Q1504425 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 485-514 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2016-09-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Milbank Quarterly | Q6850820 |
| P1476 | title | The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses | |
| P478 | volume | 94 |
| Q46349678 | A communal catalogue reveals Earth's multiscale microbial diversity |
| Q61445708 | A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions |
| Q57052796 | A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014 |
| Q90591796 | A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis |
| Q59128478 | A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries |
| Q90523173 | AYUSH and meta-research |
| Q47114826 | Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. |
| Q100712023 | Accelerating evidence-informed decision-making for the Sustainable Development Goals using machine learning |
| Q92646981 | Accumulating evidence in ecology: Once is not enough |
| Q94594288 | An international series on the integration of community pharmacy in primary health care |
| Q64101013 | Announcing the affiliation between BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Cochrane Complementary Medicine |
| Q88255497 | Application of Gelatin Sponge Impregnated with a Mixture of 3 Drugs to Intraoperative Nerve Root Block to Promote Early Postoperative Recovery of Lumbar Disc Herniation |
| Q57152847 | Are Whites and minorities more similar than different? Testing the cultural similarities hypothesis on psychopathology with a second-order meta-analysis |
| Q48021050 | Are orthodontic systematic reviews registered a priori in PROSPERO? |
| Q104501934 | Are single-visit regenerative endodontic procedures successful in treating non-vital, immature young permanent teeth? |
| Q52584127 | Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No. |
| Q52584125 | Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure |
| Q88380049 | Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes |
| Q92562297 | Association between H. pylori infection and health Outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| Q93022404 | Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study |
| Q91767107 | Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses |
| Q92361510 | Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the journal Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal (2008-2018) |
| Q64998906 | Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services. |
| Q64123996 | Cardiovascular toxicity of targeted therapies for cancer: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews |
| Q91307137 | Challenges in teaching systematic reviews to non-clinicians |
| Q91728350 | Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a perspective introducing Cochrane Corner in Eye |
| Q59681774 | Cochrane crisis: secrecy, in tolerance, and evidence-based values |
| Q91728342 | Cochrane eyes and vision |
| Q55249125 | Collaboration in orthodontic clinical trials: prevalence and association with sample size and funding. |
| Q49893463 | Community-deliverable exercise and anxiety in adults with arthritis and other rheumatic diseases: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
| Q104459358 | DOES SIZE MATTER? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF META-ANALYSIS IN AGRONOMY |
| Q38642325 | Development of a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline questions: the UpPriority Tool protocol |
| Q52676289 | Direct oral anticoagulants: what can we learn? |
| Q48563645 | Dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and site-specific cancer risk: protocol for a systematic review with an original design combining umbrella and traditional reviews. |
| Q47691417 | Duration of antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation: can we trust non-inferiority open-label trials? |
| Q89717974 | Effects of Popular Diets on Anthropometric and Cardiometabolic Parameters: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials |
| Q90548230 | Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability? |
| Q92626888 | Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews |
| Q89459585 | Evaluation of Cost-Utility of Thoracic Interlaminar Epidural Injections |
| Q47159405 | Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review |
| Q88780430 | Evidence and Health Policy: Using and Regulating Systematic Reviews |
| Q90423563 | Evidence map of pancreatic surgery: protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q90624961 | Evidence synthesis based on non-randomised studies-a critical review of studies leading to conclusions on fall risk properties of loop diuretics/beta-blockers |
| Q64097464 | Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews |
| Q57155823 | Examining the readiness of best evidence in medical education guides for integration into educational practice: A meta-synthesis |
| Q42654732 | Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
| Q48157024 | Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research |
| Q56752041 | Generating the evidence for risk reduction: a contribution to the future of food-based dietary guidelines |
| Q92025298 | Head-to-head trials in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present and future |
| Q47552176 | How to survive the medical misinformation mess |
| Q92547767 | Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Diverse Physical Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Observational Studies |
| Q55424954 | Hypothesis-Testing Demands Trustworthy Data-A Simulation Approach to Inferential Statistics Advocating the Research Program Strategy. |
| Q90092326 | Identifying Research Gaps and Prioritizing Psychological Health Evidence Synthesis Needs |
| Q90710672 | Improving the transparency of meta-analyses with interactive web applications |
| Q89026311 | Inadequate diversity of information resources searched in US-affiliated systematic reviews and meta-analyses: 2005-2016 |
| Q89565150 | Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology |
| Q54941938 | Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis. |
| Q39413566 | International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids 2016 Debate: For Science-Based Dietary Guidelines on Fats, Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews Are Decisive |
| Q47102670 | Interventions to Reduce Adult Nursing Turnover: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews |
| Q104472224 | Introducing Clinical Liver Disease "From Evidence to Practice": Summarizing Systematic Reviews in Hepatology for the Practicing Clinician |
| Q90321193 | Invited commentary-WHO Classification of Tumours: How should tumors be classified? Expert consensus, systematic reviews or both? |
| Q90258292 | Is the trend to publish reviews and clinical trials related to the journal impact factor? Analysis in dentistry field |
| Q55361260 | Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis. |
| Q91673648 | Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey |
| Q63684307 | Magnesium and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational and intervention studies |
| Q38952681 | Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness? |
| Q58927996 | Mass production of review articles is cause for concern |
| Q57020497 | Massive citations to misleading methods and research tools: Matthew effect, quotation error and citation copying |
| Q51148876 | Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis |
| Q36296971 | Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists |
| Q52658008 | Meta-research: Why research on research matters |
| Q47406111 | Mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage |
| Q92880434 | Non-inferiority versus superiority trial design for new antibiotics in an era of high antimicrobial resistance: the case for post-marketing, adaptive randomised controlled trials |
| Q42352810 | O'Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions |
| Q56365917 | Observational research on sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: A real breakthrough? |
| Q59810580 | Oral Adjuvant Curcumin Therapy for Attaining Clinical Remission in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
| Q50080887 | Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies |
| Q42355471 | Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge |
| Q58112245 | Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| Q92238483 | Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR - An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting |
| Q92399358 | Practical recommendations to conduct a neuroimaging meta-analysis for neuropsychiatric disorders |
| Q91933351 | Pragmatic methods for reviewing exceptionally large bodies of evidence: systematic mapping review and overview of systematic reviews using lung cancer survival as an exemplar |
| Q24187780 | Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults |
| Q90242079 | Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry |
| Q64053542 | Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey |
| Q64237286 | Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement |
| Q55456403 | Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline. |
| Q38615529 | Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation |
| Q49795367 | Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting |
| Q55425023 | Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. |
| Q64110746 | Reproducible pharmacokinetics |
| Q63362610 | Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis |
| Q47914021 | Review of reviews on exposures to synthetic organic chemicals and children's neurodevelopment: Methodological and interpretation challenges |
| Q64121294 | SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles |
| Q33916672 | Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews. |
| Q33770852 | Serum uric acid levels and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of evidence from observational studies, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies |
| Q53426170 | Source of bias in sugar-sweetened beverage research: a systematic review |
| Q92342801 | Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews |
| Q92923990 | Statin and Cancer Mortality and Survival: An Umbrella Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| Q49948031 | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Rhinosinusitis: a Critical Review of the Reviews |
| Q55023607 | Systematic Reviews: Challenges for Their Justification, Related Comprehensive Searches, and Implications. |
| Q90513358 | Systematic review and weight of evidence are integral to ecological and human health assessments: They need an integrated framework |
| Q61799824 | Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: a critique of Perman et al |
| Q55345267 | Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach. |
| Q48324902 | Systematic reviews for informing clinical practice. |
| Q38706560 | Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people |
| Q39036019 | Systemic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging technologies |
| Q50141120 | The Neurocognitive Profile of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Review of Meta-Analyses |
| Q92157561 | The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research |
| Q55426553 | The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map. |
| Q47552417 | The differential impact of scientific quality, bibliometric factors, and social media activity on the influence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about psoriasis. |
| Q58774096 | The discordance between evidence and health policy in the United States: the science of translational research and the critical role of diverse stakeholders |
| Q89858076 | The median and the mode as robust meta-analysis estimators in the presence of small-study effects and outliers |
| Q99558245 | The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study |
| Q40058792 | The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews |
| Q60646598 | The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis |
| Q55215398 | Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? |
| Q28076034 | Treating the host response to emerging virus diseases: lessons learned from sepsis, pneumonia, influenza and Ebola |
| Q52691721 | Trends in female authorship in research papers on eating disorders: 20-year bibliometric study |
| Q40275769 | Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
| Q42376658 | Updated clinical guidelines experience major reporting limitations |
| Q64996908 | Use of References in Responses from Scandinavian Drug Information Centres. |
| Q90128698 | Vibration of effects from diverse inclusion/exclusion criteria and analytical choices: 9216 different ways to perform an indirect comparison meta-analysis |
| Q47152353 | Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: state of the evidence from a systematic review of randomised trials |
| Q50162571 | What Makes Systematic Reviews Systematic and Why are They the Highest Level of Evidence? |
| Q47547157 | What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors |
| Q48277772 | What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences |
| Q90256212 | When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to 'treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials' |
| Q59796882 | Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis |
| Q47620205 | Why European and United States drug regulators are not speaking with one voice on anti-influenza drugs: regulatory review methodologies and the importance of 'deep' product reviews |
| Q90679780 | Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
| Q42316950 | Why scholarly publishing might be a bubble |
| Q90345406 | [Increasing the efficiency of guideline production: a narrative review] |
Search more.