Head-to-head trials in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present and future

scientific article published on 17 April 2020

Head-to-head trials in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present and future is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P356DOI10.1038/S41575-020-0293-9
P698PubMed publication ID32303700

P50authorLaurent Peyrin-BirouletQ30248039
Peter BossuytQ57155093
Simon TravisQ87729521
Silvio DaneseQ89573798
P2093author name stringLieven Pouillon
P2860cites workHead-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsorQ27024505
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationQ27860581
Review of head-to-head study designs in rheumatoid arthritisQ28073708
Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102-week data from the PLANETAS extension studyQ31085610
Methods in comparative effectiveness researchQ36417734
Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: findings of a phase IIIb, multinational, prospective, randomized studyQ36610390
Infliximab versus ciclosporin for steroid-resistant acute severe ulcerative colitis (CONSTRUCT): a mixed methods, open-label, pragmatic randomised trialQ37196938
Blinding in pharmacological trials: the devil is in the detailsQ37323277
Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension studyQ37616966
Industry sponsorship and selection of comparators in randomized clinical trialsQ37668679
Challenges to the design, execution, and analysis of randomized controlled trials for inflammatory bowel diseaseQ38045701
Pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Q38211991
Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE): Determining Therapeutic Goals for Treat-to-Target.Q38572827
IOIBD technical review on endoscopic indices for Crohn's disease clinical trialsQ38583688
Meta-analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials: opportunities and limitations created by access to raw dataQ38619218
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Q38642750
Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trialQ38787053
Interpreting Registrational Clinical Trials of Biological Therapies in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesQ38943959
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesQ38952676
Early combined immunosuppression for the management of Crohn's disease (REACT): a cluster randomised controlled trialQ38966960
Defining endoscopic response and remission in ulcerative colitis clinical trials: an international consensus.Q39098635
Network meta-analysis: an introduction for cliniciansQ39134420
3g mesalazine granules are superior to 9mg budesonide for achieving remission in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trialQ39977343
Laparoscopic ileocaecal resection versus infliximab for terminal ileitis in Crohn's disease: a randomised controlled, open-label, multicentre trialQ40071528
Every-other-day interferon beta-1b versus once-weekly interferon beta-1a for multiple sclerosis: results of a 2-year prospective randomised multicentre study (INCOMIN).Q40583199
Beyond endoscopic mucosal healing in UC: histological remission better predicts corticosteroid use and hospitalisation over 6 years of follow-upQ40926333
Induction of clinical and colonoscopic remission of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis with budesonide MMX 9 mg: pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies.Q41582729
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational StudiesQ41962966
Randomised comparison of olsalazine and mesalazine in prevention of relapses in ulcerative colitisQ42172189
Methotrexate in combination with infliximab is no more effective than infliximab alone in patients with Crohn's diseaseQ43531369
Effect of tight control management on Crohn's disease (CALM): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trialQ46150166
Mucosal Healing and Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Receiving Clinic-based vs Trough Concentration-based Dosing of InfliximabQ46210756
Population Health Management for Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseQ46265941
Effect of extended MMX mesalamine therapy for acute, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitisQ46452033
Increasing Infliximab Dose Based on Symptoms, Biomarkers, and Serum Drug Concentrations Does Not Increase Clinical, Endoscopic, or Corticosteroid-Free Remission in Patients With Active Luminal Crohn's Disease.Q47216133
Physicians' perspective on the clinical meaningfulness of inflammatory bowel disease trial results: an International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD) surveyQ47724175
Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease: an open randomised trialQ49167560
Trough concentrations of infliximab guide dosing for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Q50953891
Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis.Q51148876
Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what.Q52937785
Heterogeneity in Definitions of Efficacy and Safety Endpoints for Clinical Trials of Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review for Development of a Core Outcome Set.Q53076589
Ciclosporin versus infliximab in patients with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous steroids: a parallel, open-label randomised controlled trial.Q53122367
Cortisone in ulcerative colitis; final report on a therapeutic trial.Q55499879
Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn's diseaseQ56988763
Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trialsQ57210849
Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing ClinicianQ57789414
Superiority and non-inferiority: two sides of the same coin?Q58732954
Identification of Endpoints for Development of Antifibrosis Drugs for Treatment of Crohn’s DiseaseQ62475972
Loss of Response to Vedolizumab and Ability of Dose Intensification to Restore Response in Patients With Crohn's Disease or Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisQ64137296
Low TREM1 expression in whole blood predicts anti-TNF response in inflammatory bowel diseaseQ64261195
New biologics and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease: an update.Q64917770
Effect of once- or twice-daily MMX mesalamine (SPD476) for the induction of remission of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitisQ79596195
Once-daily, high-concentration MMX mesalamine in active ulcerative colitisQ79621238
Patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials do not represent the inflammatory bowel disease patient populationQ83463037
Combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine is superior to monotherapy with either agent in ulcerative colitisQ87263251
Patient Perspectives on Biosimilars: A Survey by the European Federation of Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis AssociationsQ88041740
Performance of Crohn's disease Clinical Trial Endpoints based upon Different Cutoffs for Patient Reported Outcomes or Endoscopic Activity: Analysis of EXTEND DataQ88398467
Systematic review with meta-analysis: endoscopic and histologic placebo rates in induction and maintenance trials of ulcerative colitisQ88478503
Head-to-head trials of systemic psoriasis therapies: a systematic review of study design and maximum acceptable treatment differencesQ89495844
Vedolizumab versus Adalimumab for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative ColitisQ90281122
Real-World Evidence and Real-World Data for Evaluating Drug Safety and EffectivenessQ90932494
Big data in IBD: a look into the futureQ91117785
Interrogating host immunity to predict treatment response in inflammatory bowel diseaseQ91452268
Changes in Vedolizumab Utilization Across US Academic Centers and Community Practice Are Associated With Improved Effectiveness and Disease OutcomesQ91729542
Histological Remission in Ulcerative Colitis: Under the Microscope Is the CureQ91755844
Induction and maintenance treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: A comprehensive reviewQ92193830
Comparison of the EMA and FDA Guidelines on Ulcerative Colitis Drug DevelopmentQ92228977
Most noninferiority trials were not designed to preserve active comparator treatment effectsQ92281117
Response to Placebo, Measured by Endoscopic Evaluation of Crohn's Disease Activity, in a Pooled Analysis of Data From 5 Randomized Controlled Induction TrialsQ92818920
Approaches to Integrating Biomarkers Into Clinical Trials and Care Pathways as Targets for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesQ92953362
Efficacy and Safety of Vedolizumab Subcutaneous Formulation in a Randomized Trial of Patients With Ulcerative ColitisQ93012972
Differences in Outcomes Reported by Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases vs Their Health Care ProfessionalsQ93340410
P2507corrigendum / erratumAuthor Correction: Head-to-head trials in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present and futureQ104750134
P921main subjectinflammatory bowel diseasesQ917447
P577publication date2020-04-17
P1433published inNature Reviews Gastroenterology & HepatologyQ2108255
P1476titleHead-to-head trials in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present and future

Search more.