Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty

scientific article published on 01 April 1997

Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1001/JAMA.277.15.1224
P698PubMed publication ID9103347

P2093author name stringM S Anderson
D Blumenthal
E G Campbell
N Causino
K S Louis
P433issue15
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)1224-1228
P577publication date1997-04-01
P1433published inThe Journal of the American Medical AssociationQ1470970
P1476titleWithholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty
P478volume277

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q42227756"Get the Consent"-Nonfinancial Conflict of Interest in Academic Clinical Research
Q35545776An Empirical Review of Major Legislation Affecting Drug Development: Past Experiences, Effects, and Unintended Consequences
Q24544212Attacks on Science: The Risks to Evidence-Based Policy
Q58106774Beyond financial conflicts of interest: Institutional oversight of faculty consulting agreements at schools of medicine and public health
Q82821790Changing the rules of the game: addressing the conflict between free access to scientific discovery and intellectual property rights
Q73196931Commercialisation of genetic diagnostic services
Q28660837Commercialization and stem cell research: a review of emerging issues
Q60517540Concerned Journals, Editors And ICMJE
Q43187440Conflict of interest in biomedical publications
Q34918959Conflicts of interest in drug development: the practices of Merck & Co., Inc.
Q34159616DNA patents and scientific discovery and innovation: assessing benefits and risks
Q56395033Data Sharing in Neurosurgery and Neurology Journals
Q36417487Diagnostic testing fails the test
Q34962859Do corresponding authors take responsibility for their work? A covert survey
Q28752430Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies
Q28755551Finer nuances of clinical study agreements for research trials
Q52958926General Clinical Research Centers in the United States make a healthy recovery
Q21144665Ghost management: how much of the medical literature is shaped behind the scenes by the pharmaceutical industry?
Q27231434How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
Q34389549Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
Q36484339Industry Support of Medical Research: Important Opportunity or Treacherous Pitfall?
Q35372675Industry and evidence-based medicine: Believable or conflicted? A systematic review of the surgical literature
Q35121778Industry-university collaborations in Canada, Japan, the UK and USA--with emphasis on publication freedom and managing the intellectual property lock-up problem
Q35559637Institutional ethics review of clinical study agreements
Q35094791Intellectual property law: a primer for scientists
Q83404901It’s About Scientific Secrecy, Dummy: A Better Equilibrium Among Genomics Patenting, Scientific Research and Health Care
Q36381359Litigation-generated science: why should we care?
Q55033893Location bias in controlled clinical trials of complementary/alternative therapies.
Q42773769Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record
Q42962752Managing conflict of interest: sense and sensibility
Q35199601Mind, Brain and Psychotherapy
Q37266348Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis.
Q53495160Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students
Q49172685Patenting and licensing of university research: promoting innovation or undermining academic values?
Q34185450Patenting human genetic material: refocusing the debate
Q33895413Patenting of genetic material: are the benefits to society being realized?
Q28654786Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey
Q55301807Prepublication disclosure of scientific results: Norms, competition, and commercial orientation.
Q52947431Psychiatrists and the pharmaceutical industry
Q24549030Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals
Q28742768Public sharing of research datasets: A pilot study of associations
Q35890916Randomized clinical trials: what gets published, and when?
Q24288789Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
Q74144024Scientific data from clinical trials: investigators' responsibilities and rights
Q74231229Scientific data from clinical trials: investigators' responsibilities and rights
Q94059466Scientific data from clinical trials: investigators' responsibilities and rights
Q30690432Scientific data from clinical trials: investigators' responsibilities and rights
Q28710576Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey
Q24554874Sponsorship, authorship and accountability
Q74568328Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability
Q58662706Surgical patents and patients--the ethical dilemmas
Q24810516The benefits and threats of research partnerships with industry
Q28606345The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits
Q33296106The influence of personal and environmental factors on professionalism in medical education
Q78085281The right answer for the wrong question: consequences of type III error for public health research
Q34159801Translating personalized medicine using new genetic technologies in clinical practice: the ethical issues
Q28476002Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis
Q48771401Using Market-Exclusivity Incentives to Promote Pharmaceutical Innovation
Q35587396What do we really know about conflicts of interest in biomedical research?
Q28742671Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data

Search more.