scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1016/J.ARTH.2011.12.014 |
P953 | full work available at URL | https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0883540311006929?httpAccept=text/plain |
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0883540311006929?httpAccept=text/xml | ||
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 22285257 |
P2093 | author name string | Alejandra Tellez | |
Carlos A. Higuera | |||
Peter J. Brooks | |||
Preetesh D. Patel | |||
Wael K. Barsoum | |||
Alison K. Klika | |||
P2860 | cites work | Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register: 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. | Q31032137 |
Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems | Q33634186 | ||
The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry-what have we learned? | Q33795867 | ||
Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases | Q33942164 | ||
Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry: aligning operations with information technology | Q34628153 | ||
The German Arthroplasty Register. | Q35052587 | ||
Registration in the danish hip arthroplasty registry: completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications | Q35888855 | ||
Knee arthroplasty registers | Q36720648 | ||
The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties | Q39223984 | ||
Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 | Q39513006 | ||
Maintaining a hip registry for 25 years. Mayo Clinic experience | Q40875099 | ||
The Norwegian Joint Registry | Q43422160 | ||
Factors predicting complication rates following total knee replacement | Q46184054 | ||
Irish National Joint Registry: a concept | Q50120114 | ||
The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: Report of the hip register | Q50688118 | ||
How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden | Q50923666 | ||
Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register | Q51248192 | ||
Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. | Q52918100 | ||
The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992 | Q72846184 | ||
Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register | Q73148239 | ||
National Joint Replacement Registries: Has the Time Come? | Q77069699 | ||
The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register | Q78649727 | ||
Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register | Q80141986 | ||
The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project | Q93931780 | ||
P433 | issue | 6 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | knee replacement | Q1693864 |
hip replacement surgery | Q32333487 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 842-50.e1 | |
P577 | publication date | 2012-01-28 | |
P1433 | published in | Journal of Arthroplasty | Q15757705 |
P1476 | title | Design, implementation, and comparison of methods for collecting implant registry data at different hospital types | |
Design, Implementation, and Comparison of Methods for Collecting Implant Registry Data at Different Hospital Types | |||
P478 | volume | 27 |
Q94460580 | Assessment of a novel scanner-supported system for processing of child health and immunization data in Uganda |
Q35000805 | Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries |
Q28595648 | New Zealand Joint Registry data underestimates the rate of prosthetic joint infection |
Q36229694 | Quality criteria for medical device registries: best practice approaches for improving patient safety - a systematic review of international experiences |
Q35390101 | Registries as a tool for optimizing safety of endoprostheses. Experiences from other countries and the setup of the German arthroplasty register |
Search more.