Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems

scientific article

Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1039536070
P356DOI10.1007/S11999-010-1469-3
P932PMC publication ID3049639
P698PubMed publication ID20635174
P5875ResearchGate publication ID45200744

P50authorAmrapali ZaveriQ34315853
Jatin ShahQ47543868
Dimple RajgorQ47543869
Ricardo PietrobonQ56604697
Shreyasee PradhanQ56604760
P2093author name stringMariana McCready
Shreyasee Pradhan
P2860cites workCould an open-source clinical trial data-management system be what we have all been looking for?Q28755352
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportQ29547407
Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnairesQ30559421
DADOS-Prospective: an open source application for Web-based prospective data collectionQ31082784
Implementation of electronic data capture systems: barriers and solutionsQ31099045
Building Measurement and Data Collection into Medical PracticeQ32099128
The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challengesQ33230033
Results from data mining in a radiology department: the relevance of data quality.Q33301277
Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: costs simulation studyQ33426640
Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 casesQ33942164
The benefits and challenges of an electronic medical record: much more than a "word-processed" patient chartQ34189243
A European spine registryQ34795041
The use of handheld computers in clinical trialsQ34977064
The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES)--10-years experienceQ35194802
Translation in the health professions: converting science into actionQ36410998
Translational research: from benchside to bedsideQ37174889
High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriersQ38910828
Is the future for clinical trials internet-based? A cluster randomized clinical trialQ40373786
The Swiss Orthopaedic Registry.Q48937111
How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in SwedenQ50923666
The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES)Q70532929
Practice-based research networks answer primary care questionsQ74532158
How the open-source development model can improve medical softwareQ74627688
[Many years of registration have improved the quality of hip arthroplasty]Q77917527
P433issue10
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectopen-source softwareQ1130645
P304page(s)2664-2671
P577publication date2010-10-01
P13046publication type of scholarly workreview articleQ7318358
P1433published inClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchQ5133783
P1476titleElectronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems
P478volume468

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q43453683A European venous registry: pitfalls and opportunities
Q58700187Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels' attitudes, experiences and work load
Q40127139Barriers to Completion of Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Q37219528Challenges in Outcome Measurement: Clinical Research Perspective
Q47611170Characteristics of patients with fragility hip fractures in the northern Kyushu district in Japan: a multicenter prospective registry based on an electronic data capture system.
Q24197724Comparison of self administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods
Q47250415Creation of Data Repositories to Advance Nursing Science
Q34143615Design, Implementation, and Comparison of Methods for Collecting Implant Registry Data at Different Hospital Types
Q35000805Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries
Q42659491EsPRit: ethics committee proposals for Long Term Medical Data Registries in rapidly evolving research fields - a future-proof best practice approach.
Q35030328Evaluating the psychometric properties of an e-based version of the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire
Q28730514Evaluation of partial and total splenectomy in children with sickle cell disease using an Internet-based registry
Q28673371Glocal clinical registries: pacemaker registry design and implementation for global and local integration--methodology and case study
Q33882721Implementation of an open adoption research data management system for clinical studies
Q55100618Inflammatory bowel disease registries for collection of patient iron parameters in Europe.
Q34343260Managing Data in Surgical Trials: A Guide to Modern-Day Data Management Systems
Q26796538Paperless clinical trials: Myth or reality?
Q31113652REDLetr: Workflow and tools to support the migration of legacy clinical data capture systems to REDCap
Q37219624Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective
Q86841287The author replies:
Q30984200Transtrochanteric fractures: evaluation of data between hospital admission and discharge
Q52565600Utilization of a Clinical Trial Management System for the Whole Clinical Trial Process as an Integrated Database: System Development.
Q87301593Validation study of a pooled electronic healthcare database: the effect of obesity on the revision rate of total knee arthroplasty

Search more.