Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.

scientific article

Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61769-9
P698PubMed publication ID19091393

P50authorHarry R DaltonQ43056922
Adrian J. StanleyQ55232560
P2093author name stringD Ashley
U Warshow
E Thompson
M Groome
G Benson
W Murray
O Blatchford
A Cahill
C Mowat
D R Gaya
P2860cites workThe TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MIQ22252998
Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageQ24541354
Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation studyQ24678793
A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhageQ33145871
Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleedingQ33154810
Outpatient care of selected patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageQ33173846
Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in west of Scotland: case ascertainment studyQ33175376
Deep venous thrombosis: early discharge strategies and outpatient managementQ33655227
Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal HaemorrhageQ36904361
Predicting poor outcome from acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhageQ44255552
Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhageQ44676646
Incremental value of upper endoscopy for triage of patients with acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhageQ44960490
Successful outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: use of practice guidelines in a large patient seriesQ46237501
Artificial neural network as a predictive instrument in patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.Q51898976
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.Q53228954
Outpatient care for selected patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleedingQ72648838
Outpatient management for low-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled trialQ77388547
Outpatient management of "low-risk" nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage. Are we ready to put evidence into practice?Q77388607
Three-year prospective validation of a pre-endoscopic risk stratification in patients with acute upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhageQ78027951
Blatchford scoring system is a useful scoring system for detecting patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who do not need endoscopic interventionQ80836772
P433issue9657
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectpatientQ181600
multicenter clinical trialQ6934595
P304page(s)42-47
P577publication date2008-12-16
P1433published inThe LancetQ939416
P1476titleOutpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation
P478volume373

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q36255978A Novel Easy-to-Use Prediction Scheme for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Cologne-WATCH (C-WATCH) Risk Score
Q37823319A clinical guide to using intravenous proton-pump inhibitors in reflux and peptic ulcers
Q47097429A novel scoring system for prediction of esophageal varices in critically ill patients
Q92211396AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q86359937Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q38063422Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment.
Q41060093Analysis of risk scoring for the outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q47657429Arterial lactate does not predict outcome better than existing risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Q41060605Blatchford Score Is Superior to AIMS65 Score in Predicting the Need for Clinical Interventions in Elderly Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed
Q90324976Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Q102152271Characteristics of peptic ulcer bleeding in cirrhotic patients with esophageal and gastric varices
Q41907667Clinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Q37633196Clinical Performance of Prediction Rules and Nasogastric Lavage for the Evaluation of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Q37066351Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Q39611009Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality
Q90401806Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q37567350Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study
Q41546504Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study
Q41628835Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department
Q89634461Correlation between Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
Q37029351Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care
Q38229545Developing an international register of clinical prediction rules for use in primary care: a descriptive analysis
Q89553062Diagnosis and Management of Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Perspectives
Q37974466Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Q34024765Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper.
Q26991517Diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding: A practical guide for clinicians
Q50026338Differences in the clinical course of 516 Japanese patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding between weekday and weekend admissions
Q35672478Does Preendoscopy Rockall Score Safely Identify Low Risk Patients following Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage?
Q37681226Duodenal variceal bleed: an unusual cause of upper gastrointestinal bleed and a difficult diagnosis to make
Q40935304Early lactate clearance for predicting active bleeding in critically ill patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study
Q55249822Elevated lactate level predicts intensive care unit admissions, endoscopies and transfusions in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
Q88394167Embracing early discharge in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding
Q44856467Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients
Q34669172Endoscopic management of tumor bleeding from inoperable gastric cancer.
Q27021001Endoscopy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q33163564Etiology and adverse outcome predictors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 589 patients in Nepal.
Q47919690External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q37311755Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Severity Triage: Locally Derived Score May Outperform Existing Scoring Systems
Q88294749Glasgow Blatchford Score and risk stratifications in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed: can we extend this to 2 for urgent outpatient management?
Q42367656Glasgow Blatchford Score of limited benefit for low-risk urban patients: a mixed methods study
Q99402600Guidelines for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Q38743469Guidelines for endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q28069735Impact analysis studies of clinical prediction rules relevant to primary care: a systematic review
Q43271470Is the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
Q42321675Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q37981830Management of patients with ulcer bleeding
Q38127294Modern management of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q44203758Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
Q38166285Multidisciplinary management strategies for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q37768159Optimal management of peptic ulcer disease in the elderly
Q92102341Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
Q36761888Pillcam ESO(®) is more accurate than clinical scoring systems in risk stratifying emergency room patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q43177029Prediction of bleeding etiology: the clinician is vindicated!
Q38948455Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q34076408Recent advances in peptic ulcer bleeding
Q33810054Regional differences in outcomes of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Saskatchewan
Q84974066Risk assessment in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q40356950Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice
Q34656150State-of-the-art management of acute bleeding peptic ulcer disease
Q36365595The AIMS65 Score Is a Useful Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Urgent Endoscopy in Patients with High AIMS65 Scores.
Q58915178The Acute Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Q37179227The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and the multidimensional approach. A new look at the older patient with gastroenterological disorders.
Q38801731The Predictive Value of Preendoscopic Risk Scores to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review
Q33940825The cost-effectiveness analysis of video capsule endoscopy compared to other strategies to manage acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the ED.
Q42771971Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Q88550271Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease: Causes, Characteristics and Factors Associated with Need for Endoscopic Therapeutic Intervention
Q37358348Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Development of the Severity Score
Q37311790Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Validation of the Severity Score
Q26766658Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?
Q41843561Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: an update
Q41974858Urgent endoscopy in severe non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: does the Glasgow-Blatchford score help endoscopists?
Q35579561Use of glasgow-blatchford bleeding score reduces hospital stay duration and costs for patients with low-risk upper GI bleeding
Q90342568Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Q36416896Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q36149454Why do mortality rates for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding differ around the world? A systematic review of cohort studies

Search more.