Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

scientific article published in September 2007

Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.AJEM.2006.12.024
P698PubMed publication ID17870480

P2093author name stringI-Chuan Chen
Jih-Chang Chen
Cheng-Ting Hsiao
Ming-Szu Hung
Te-Fa Chiu
P433issue7
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectpatientQ181600
P304page(s)774-779
P577publication date2007-09-01
P1433published inAmerican Journal of Emergency MedicineQ4744241
P1476titleRisk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
P478volume25

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q44613976Acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding--experience of a tertiary care center in southern India
Q41060093Analysis of risk scoring for the outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q83010460Assessing bleeds clinically: what's the score?
Q41907667Clinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Q37633196Clinical Performance of Prediction Rules and Nasogastric Lavage for the Evaluation of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Q37311587Clinical Risk Characteristics of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Severity: A Multivariable Risk Analysis
Q37666495Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review
Q37066351Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Q55457650Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
Q39611009Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality
Q41678520Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q43746767Comparison of scoring systems for the prediction of outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective study
Q41628835Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department
Q33615491Comparison of two prognostic scores in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Antananarivo
Q64989965Dataset for evaluation of threescoring systems for forecasting the clinical outcomes of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) - Ahvaz, Iran.
Q89553062Diagnosis and Management of Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Perspectives
Q37974466Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Q34024765Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper.
Q35672478Does Preendoscopy Rockall Score Safely Identify Low Risk Patients following Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage?
Q44856467Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients
Q49448103Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q37311755Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Severity Triage: Locally Derived Score May Outperform Existing Scoring Systems
Q87041238Gastrointestinal bleeding: who needs urgent endoscopic intervention?
Q42367656Glasgow Blatchford Score of limited benefit for low-risk urban patients: a mixed methods study
Q38743469Guidelines for endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q43271470Is the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
Q37596204Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?
Q37999016Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage: controversies and areas of uncertainty
Q37981830Management of patients with ulcer bleeding
Q38127294Modern management of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q50490800Novel nasogastric tube-related criteria for urgent endoscopy in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Q34906599Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.
Q36761888Pillcam ESO(®) is more accurate than clinical scoring systems in risk stratifying emergency room patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q90734977Predictors of rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper digestive bleeding
Q89938906Rebleeding in Variceal and Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Cirrhotic Patients Using Vitamin K1: The LIVER-K Study
Q84974066Risk assessment in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q40356950Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice
Q36932086Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q36848935The Performance of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score in Predicting Clinical Interventions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Vietnamese Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Q33940825The cost-effectiveness analysis of video capsule endoscopy compared to other strategies to manage acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the ED.
Q42771971Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Q37358348Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Development of the Severity Score
Q37311790Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Validation of the Severity Score
Q26766658Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?
Q36569992Urgent endoscopy in elderly patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q36306379Use of the Complete Rockall Score and the Forrest Classification to Assess Outcome in Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Subject to After-hours Endoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Q37255836Using an 'action set' for the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Q36416896Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Search more.