Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study

scientific article published on 28 April 2015

Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1034161344
P356DOI10.1186/S12961-015-0011-1
P932PMC publication ID4424515
P698PubMed publication ID25928535
P5875ResearchGate publication ID275666359

P50authorMireille GoetghebeurQ96947898
P2093author name stringChristine Kriza
Peter Kolominsky-Rabas
Philip Wahlster
National Leading-Edge Cluster Medical Technologies ‘Medical Valley EMN’
Sandra Schaller
P2860cites workChronic monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure in patients with severe heart failure: multicentre experience of the monitoring Pulmonary Artery Pressure by Implantable device Responding to Ultrasonic Signal (PAPIRUS) II studyQ61651434
Continuous ambulatory right heart pressure measurements with an implantable hemodynamic monitor: a multicenter, 12-month follow-up study of patients with chronic heart failureQ74119819
One-year mortality among unselected outpatients with heart failureQ78554641
Stakeholder involvement in expensive drug recommendation decisions: an international perspectiveQ83191879
Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development processQ84759551
A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines.Q48119113
Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) and efficient health care decision making with multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): applying the EVIDEM framework to medicines appraisalQ48572824
Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.Q50790591
Multicriteria decision analysis for including health interventions in the universal health coverage benefit package in Thailand.Q50909707
Social values and health priority setting in Germany.Q50923281
Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial.Q51550980
Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.Q52921113
Social values and health policy: a new international research programme.Q53126206
Cost issues in new disease-modifying treatments for advanced cancer: in-depth interviews with physicians.Q53185084
Why do single event probabilities confuse patients?Q53443715
The ethics of accountability in managed care reformQ56910417
Selecting medical devices and materials for development in Korea: the analytic hierarchy process approachQ57214905
Essential components of public health evidence reviews: capturing intervention complexity, implementation, economics and equityQ57382085
Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize health interventions: Capitalizing on first experiencesQ58476451
Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal?Q58476484
???Q28267062
Overview of the 2011 Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee Meeting on the CardioMEMS Champion Heart Failure Monitoring SystemQ27008839
Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit?Q27009758
How long and how well: oncologists' attitudes toward the relative value of life-prolonging v. quality of life-enhancing treatmentsQ30226892
The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?Q31061788
Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking--the EVIDEM framework and potential applicationsQ33395099
Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patientsQ33797377
Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in CanadaQ34086884
What do patients and the public want from primary care?Q34137312
Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcareQ34629519
Medicines and the media: news reports of medicines recommended for government reimbursement in Australia.Q34728746
Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysisQ35017485
Multi-criteria decision analysis for setting priorities on HIV/AIDS interventions in ThailandQ35847949
Field testing of a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for coverage of a screening test for cervical cancer in South AfricaQ35898829
Cognitive Processes in Decisions Under Risk are not the Same as in Decisions Under UncertaintyQ36090070
Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments?Q36639084
Heart failure: the commonest reason for hospital admission in Germany: medical and economic perspectivesQ37210350
In a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survivalQ37289756
Demands for 'off-licence' access to trastuzumab (Herceptin): content analysis of UK newspaper articlesQ37332662
Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany.Q37513062
Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: a review of the literature.Q37588249
Good judgments do not require complex cognitionQ37604201
The Public Health Responsibility Deal: how should such a complex public health policy be evaluated?Q38124023
Physician-directed patient self-management of left atrial pressure in advanced chronic heart failureQ38375639
Early benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals in Germany: manufacturers' expectations versus the Federal Joint Committee's decisionsQ39140889
Disease management: remote monitoring in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators, resynchronization devices, and haemodynamic monitorsQ39403892
Balancing Equity and Efficiency in Health Priorities in Ghana: The Use of Multicriteria Decision AnalysisQ39963184
Accountability for reasonablenessQ42769474
Implementation of EUnetHTA core Model® in Lombardia: the VTS framework.Q43894085
An application of a proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries: the case of Côte d'IvoireQ43899167
Which criteria are considered in healthcare decisions? Insights from an international survey of policy and clinical decision makersQ44234115
Population of Polish patients participating in the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot).Q44669648
Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: An application to ghanaQ46954952
The use of multi-criteria decision analysis weight elicitation techniques in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a pilot studyQ47240073
Randomized controlled trial of an implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor in patients with advanced heart failure: the COMPASS-HF study.Q47845346
Comparison of a radiofrequency-based wireless pressure sensor to swan-ganz catheter and echocardiography for ambulatory assessment of pulmonary artery pressure in heart failureQ48011867
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)24
P577publication date2015-04-28
P1433published inHealth Research Policy and SystemsQ15751858
P1476titleExploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study
P478volume13

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38653139AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATE-HTA.
Q52603250Applying a Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Approach to Elicit Stakeholders' Preferences in Italy: The Case of Obinutuzumab for Rituximab-Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL).
Q33568653Appraising the holistic value of Lenvatinib for radio-iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: A multi-country study applying pragmatic MCDA.
Q35685387Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).
Q59130348Can reflective multicriteria be the new paradigm for healthcare decision-making? The EVIDEM journey
Q39055438Eliciting societal preferences of reimbursement decision criteria for anti cancer drugs in South Korea
Q47583991Health Technology Assessment and Appraisal of Therapies for Rare Diseases.
Q92131859Hospital staff perspectives towards health technology assessment: data from a multidisciplinary survey
Q37297978Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs.
Q90043415Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art
Q58078991Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps
Q37692633Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL).

Search more.