In a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survival

scientific article published on April 2012

In a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survival is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1377/HLTHAFF.2011.0251
P932PMC publication ID3821071
P698PubMed publication ID22492887
P5875ResearchGate publication ID223974269

P50authorPeter J NeumannQ87756484
Peter A. UbelQ98066077
P2093author name stringChaim M Bell
William K Evans
Elizabeth L Strevel
Eric Nadler
Jennifer A Palmer
Michael A Kozminski
Scott R Berry
P2860cites workPhysician awareness of prescription drug costs: a missing element of drug advertising and promotion.Q44330820
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journalsQ44618062
Cancer drugs offer hope, but at huge expenseQ47612903
The unbearable rightness of bedside rationing. Physician duties in a climate of cost containmentQ48795245
Managed care and medical technology: implications for cost growthQ50158300
The influence of cost-effectiveness information on physicians' cancer screening recommendations.Q50715996
Out-of-pocket health-care expenditures among older Americans with cancer.Q50744572
On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.Q53444119
Role of chemotherapy for patients with recurrent platinum-resistant advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.Q53615123
Specialty distribution of U.S. physicians--the invisible driver of health care costsQ70592485
Cancer therapy costs influence treatment: a national survey of oncologistsQ82392206
Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancerQ27860681
Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancerQ28278736
Physician awareness of drug cost: a systematic reviewQ28469310
Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancerQ29616236
How long and how well: oncologists' attitudes toward the relative value of life-prolonging v. quality of life-enhancing treatmentsQ30226892
Cancer care, money, and the value of life: whose justice? Which rationality?Q33268609
The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative studyQ33307460
Physicians' attitudes about prescribing and knowledge of the costs of common medicationsQ33920872
The price tag on progress--chemotherapy for colorectal cancerQ34335201
How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluationsQ34714134
Pricing medicines: theory and practice, challenges and opportunitiesQ36028241
Cost of cancer care: issues and implicationsQ36702504
Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: a pilot surveyQ36702527
Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring qualityQ41729158
Continental Divide? The attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugsQ42671478
Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs offer good value?Q43494341
P433issue4
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)709-717
P577publication date2012-04-01
P1433published inHealth AffairsQ260110
P1476titleIn a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survival
P478volume31

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37157764Cost-effectiveness analysis of papillary thyroid cancer surveillance
Q39737036Cost-effectiveness of adding carfilzomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma from a US perspective
Q38717851Cost-effectiveness of blinatumomab versus salvage chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory Philadelphia-chromosome-negative B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia from a US payer perspective
Q47804400Cost-effectiveness of carfilzomib plus dexamethasone compared with bortezomib plus dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States
Q36402852Do new cancer drugs offer good value for money? The perspectives of oncologists, health care policy makers, patients, and the general population.
Q35583822Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study
Q38627241Exploring the potential value of improved care for secondary hyperparathyroidism with a novel calcimimetic therapy.
Q88490174Integrating clinical and economic evidence in clinical guidelines: More needed than ever!
Q37350131Oncologists' and family physicians' views on value for money of cancer and congestive heart failure care
Q91599579The Cost of Oncology Drugs: A Pharmacy Perspective, Part 2
Q52618970The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies.
Q55385665US internists' awareness and use of overtreatment guidelines: a national survey.

Search more.